Cargando…

Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary tumor in the brain, with poor prognosis and limited effective therapies. Although Bevacizumab (BEV) has shown promise in extending progression-free survival (PFS) treating GBM, there is no evidence for its ability to prolong overall surviv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Minjie, Zhou, Zhirui, Huang, Xiao, Chen, Zhenchao, Zhang, Licheng, Zhang, Jinsen, Hua, Wei, Mao, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11043-6
_version_ 1785058607569567744
author Fu, Minjie
Zhou, Zhirui
Huang, Xiao
Chen, Zhenchao
Zhang, Licheng
Zhang, Jinsen
Hua, Wei
Mao, Ying
author_facet Fu, Minjie
Zhou, Zhirui
Huang, Xiao
Chen, Zhenchao
Zhang, Licheng
Zhang, Jinsen
Hua, Wei
Mao, Ying
author_sort Fu, Minjie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary tumor in the brain, with poor prognosis and limited effective therapies. Although Bevacizumab (BEV) has shown promise in extending progression-free survival (PFS) treating GBM, there is no evidence for its ability to prolong overall survival (OS). Given the uncertainty surrounding BEV treatment strategies, we aimed to provide an evidence map associated with BEV therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the period from January 1, 1970, to March 1, 2022, for studies reporting the prognoses of patients with rGBM receiving BEV. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). The secondary endpoints were PFS, steroid use reduction, and risk of adverse effects. A scoping review and an evidence map were conducted to explore the optimal BEV treatment (including combination regimen, dosage, and window of opportunity). RESULTS: Patients with rGBM could gain benefits in PFS, palliative, and cognitive advantages from BEV treatment, although the OS benefits could not be verified with high-quality evidence. Furthermore, BEV combined therapy (especially with lomustine and radiotherapy) showed higher efficacy than BEV monotherapy in the survival of patients with rGBM. Specific molecular alterations (IDH mutation status) and clinical features (large tumor burden and double-positive sign) could predict better responses to BEV administration. A low dosage of BEV showed equal efficacy to the recommended dose, but the optimal opportunity window for BEV administration remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Although OS benefits from BEV-containing regimens could not be verified in this scoping review, the PFS benefits and side effects control supported BEV application in rGBM. Combining BEV with novel treatments like tumor-treating field (TTF) and administration at first recurrence may optimize the therapeutic efficacy. rGBM with a low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCL), large tumor burden, or IDH mutation is more likely to benefit from BEV treatment. High-quality studies are warranted to explore the combination modality and identify BEV-response subpopulations to maximize benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10265794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102657942023-06-15 Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map Fu, Minjie Zhou, Zhirui Huang, Xiao Chen, Zhenchao Zhang, Licheng Zhang, Jinsen Hua, Wei Mao, Ying BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary tumor in the brain, with poor prognosis and limited effective therapies. Although Bevacizumab (BEV) has shown promise in extending progression-free survival (PFS) treating GBM, there is no evidence for its ability to prolong overall survival (OS). Given the uncertainty surrounding BEV treatment strategies, we aimed to provide an evidence map associated with BEV therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the period from January 1, 1970, to March 1, 2022, for studies reporting the prognoses of patients with rGBM receiving BEV. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). The secondary endpoints were PFS, steroid use reduction, and risk of adverse effects. A scoping review and an evidence map were conducted to explore the optimal BEV treatment (including combination regimen, dosage, and window of opportunity). RESULTS: Patients with rGBM could gain benefits in PFS, palliative, and cognitive advantages from BEV treatment, although the OS benefits could not be verified with high-quality evidence. Furthermore, BEV combined therapy (especially with lomustine and radiotherapy) showed higher efficacy than BEV monotherapy in the survival of patients with rGBM. Specific molecular alterations (IDH mutation status) and clinical features (large tumor burden and double-positive sign) could predict better responses to BEV administration. A low dosage of BEV showed equal efficacy to the recommended dose, but the optimal opportunity window for BEV administration remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Although OS benefits from BEV-containing regimens could not be verified in this scoping review, the PFS benefits and side effects control supported BEV application in rGBM. Combining BEV with novel treatments like tumor-treating field (TTF) and administration at first recurrence may optimize the therapeutic efficacy. rGBM with a low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCL), large tumor burden, or IDH mutation is more likely to benefit from BEV treatment. High-quality studies are warranted to explore the combination modality and identify BEV-response subpopulations to maximize benefits. BioMed Central 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10265794/ /pubmed/37316802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11043-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fu, Minjie
Zhou, Zhirui
Huang, Xiao
Chen, Zhenchao
Zhang, Licheng
Zhang, Jinsen
Hua, Wei
Mao, Ying
Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map
title Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map
title_full Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map
title_fullStr Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map
title_full_unstemmed Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map
title_short Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map
title_sort use of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11043-6
work_keys_str_mv AT fuminjie useofbevacizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaascopingreviewandevidencemap
AT zhouzhirui useofbevacizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaascopingreviewandevidencemap
AT huangxiao useofbevacizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaascopingreviewandevidencemap
AT chenzhenchao useofbevacizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaascopingreviewandevidencemap
AT zhanglicheng useofbevacizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaascopingreviewandevidencemap
AT zhangjinsen useofbevacizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaascopingreviewandevidencemap
AT huawei useofbevacizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaascopingreviewandevidencemap
AT maoying useofbevacizumabinrecurrentglioblastomaascopingreviewandevidencemap