Cargando…
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the safety experience of women vaccinated with vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 during breastfeeding or pregnancy. METHODS: Via an online questionnaire, we have inquired about the safety experience of 2192 pregnant or breastfeeding women vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, inclu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.06.002 |
_version_ | 1785058635137679360 |
---|---|
author | Terezia, Harvanova Zuzana, Kobliskova Petr, Novak |
author_facet | Terezia, Harvanova Zuzana, Kobliskova Petr, Novak |
author_sort | Terezia, Harvanova |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the safety experience of women vaccinated with vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 during breastfeeding or pregnancy. METHODS: Via an online questionnaire, we have inquired about the safety experience of 2192 pregnant or breastfeeding women vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs), pregnancy outcomes, and confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: The incidence of other AEs was higher in women vaccinated during breastfeeding. Significant differences were observed for fatigue (relative risk [RR] 1.230, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.051-1.444, P = 0.0098), headache (RR 1.822, 95% CI 1.379-2.418, P <0.0001), myalgia (RR 1.633, 95% CI 1.269-2.110, P <0.0001), chills (RR 2.027, 95% CI, P <0.0001), subfebrile temperature ≤38°C (RR 1.697, 95% CI 1.240-2.335, P = 0.0007), arthralgia (RR 1.924, 95% CI 1.340-2.776, P = 0.0002), fever >38°C (RR 6.410, 95% CI 2.890-14.30, P <0.0001), and shivers (RR 2.204, 95% CI 1.264-3.863, P = 0.0049). No pattern of serious AEs emerged. Menstrual cycle bleeding disorders occurred in 0.7% of breastfeeding women after the first dose and 0.5% after the second dose. One spontaneous abortion occurred; 93.1% of pregnancies were carried to term, 5.6% late preterm, 0.9% moderate preterm, and 0.3% very preterm. Two children had congenital defects. Vaccine efficacy was 96.3%. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnant and breastfeeding women was similar to the general population. Breastfeeding women experienced higher AE rates than pregnant women, presumably due to immune alterations in pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10265926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102659262023-06-14 Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women Terezia, Harvanova Zuzana, Kobliskova Petr, Novak IJID Reg Coronavirus (COVID-19) Collection OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the safety experience of women vaccinated with vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 during breastfeeding or pregnancy. METHODS: Via an online questionnaire, we have inquired about the safety experience of 2192 pregnant or breastfeeding women vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs), pregnancy outcomes, and confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: The incidence of other AEs was higher in women vaccinated during breastfeeding. Significant differences were observed for fatigue (relative risk [RR] 1.230, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.051-1.444, P = 0.0098), headache (RR 1.822, 95% CI 1.379-2.418, P <0.0001), myalgia (RR 1.633, 95% CI 1.269-2.110, P <0.0001), chills (RR 2.027, 95% CI, P <0.0001), subfebrile temperature ≤38°C (RR 1.697, 95% CI 1.240-2.335, P = 0.0007), arthralgia (RR 1.924, 95% CI 1.340-2.776, P = 0.0002), fever >38°C (RR 6.410, 95% CI 2.890-14.30, P <0.0001), and shivers (RR 2.204, 95% CI 1.264-3.863, P = 0.0049). No pattern of serious AEs emerged. Menstrual cycle bleeding disorders occurred in 0.7% of breastfeeding women after the first dose and 0.5% after the second dose. One spontaneous abortion occurred; 93.1% of pregnancies were carried to term, 5.6% late preterm, 0.9% moderate preterm, and 0.3% very preterm. Two children had congenital defects. Vaccine efficacy was 96.3%. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnant and breastfeeding women was similar to the general population. Breastfeeding women experienced higher AE rates than pregnant women, presumably due to immune alterations in pregnancy. Elsevier 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10265926/ /pubmed/37363194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.06.002 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Coronavirus (COVID-19) Collection Terezia, Harvanova Zuzana, Kobliskova Petr, Novak Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women |
title | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women |
title_full | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women |
title_short | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women |
title_sort | evaluation of sars-cov-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women |
topic | Coronavirus (COVID-19) Collection |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.06.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tereziaharvanova evaluationofsarscov2vaccinationinpregnantandbreastfeedingwomen AT zuzanakobliskova evaluationofsarscov2vaccinationinpregnantandbreastfeedingwomen AT petrnovak evaluationofsarscov2vaccinationinpregnantandbreastfeedingwomen |