Cargando…

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the safety experience of women vaccinated with vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 during breastfeeding or pregnancy. METHODS: Via an online questionnaire, we have inquired about the safety experience of 2192 pregnant or breastfeeding women vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terezia, Harvanova, Zuzana, Kobliskova, Petr, Novak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.06.002
_version_ 1785058635137679360
author Terezia, Harvanova
Zuzana, Kobliskova
Petr, Novak
author_facet Terezia, Harvanova
Zuzana, Kobliskova
Petr, Novak
author_sort Terezia, Harvanova
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the safety experience of women vaccinated with vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 during breastfeeding or pregnancy. METHODS: Via an online questionnaire, we have inquired about the safety experience of 2192 pregnant or breastfeeding women vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs), pregnancy outcomes, and confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: The incidence of other AEs was higher in women vaccinated during breastfeeding. Significant differences were observed for fatigue (relative risk [RR] 1.230, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.051-1.444, P = 0.0098), headache (RR 1.822, 95% CI 1.379-2.418, P <0.0001), myalgia (RR 1.633, 95% CI 1.269-2.110, P <0.0001), chills (RR 2.027, 95% CI, P <0.0001), subfebrile temperature ≤38°C (RR 1.697, 95% CI 1.240-2.335, P = 0.0007), arthralgia (RR 1.924, 95% CI 1.340-2.776, P = 0.0002), fever >38°C (RR 6.410, 95% CI 2.890-14.30, P <0.0001), and shivers (RR 2.204, 95% CI 1.264-3.863, P = 0.0049). No pattern of serious AEs emerged. Menstrual cycle bleeding disorders occurred in 0.7% of breastfeeding women after the first dose and 0.5% after the second dose. One spontaneous abortion occurred; 93.1% of pregnancies were carried to term, 5.6% late preterm, 0.9% moderate preterm, and 0.3% very preterm. Two children had congenital defects. Vaccine efficacy was 96.3%. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnant and breastfeeding women was similar to the general population. Breastfeeding women experienced higher AE rates than pregnant women, presumably due to immune alterations in pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10265926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102659262023-06-14 Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women Terezia, Harvanova Zuzana, Kobliskova Petr, Novak IJID Reg Coronavirus (COVID-19) Collection OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the safety experience of women vaccinated with vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 during breastfeeding or pregnancy. METHODS: Via an online questionnaire, we have inquired about the safety experience of 2192 pregnant or breastfeeding women vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs), pregnancy outcomes, and confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: The incidence of other AEs was higher in women vaccinated during breastfeeding. Significant differences were observed for fatigue (relative risk [RR] 1.230, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.051-1.444, P = 0.0098), headache (RR 1.822, 95% CI 1.379-2.418, P <0.0001), myalgia (RR 1.633, 95% CI 1.269-2.110, P <0.0001), chills (RR 2.027, 95% CI, P <0.0001), subfebrile temperature ≤38°C (RR 1.697, 95% CI 1.240-2.335, P = 0.0007), arthralgia (RR 1.924, 95% CI 1.340-2.776, P = 0.0002), fever >38°C (RR 6.410, 95% CI 2.890-14.30, P <0.0001), and shivers (RR 2.204, 95% CI 1.264-3.863, P = 0.0049). No pattern of serious AEs emerged. Menstrual cycle bleeding disorders occurred in 0.7% of breastfeeding women after the first dose and 0.5% after the second dose. One spontaneous abortion occurred; 93.1% of pregnancies were carried to term, 5.6% late preterm, 0.9% moderate preterm, and 0.3% very preterm. Two children had congenital defects. Vaccine efficacy was 96.3%. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnant and breastfeeding women was similar to the general population. Breastfeeding women experienced higher AE rates than pregnant women, presumably due to immune alterations in pregnancy. Elsevier 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10265926/ /pubmed/37363194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.06.002 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Coronavirus (COVID-19) Collection
Terezia, Harvanova
Zuzana, Kobliskova
Petr, Novak
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women
title Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women
title_full Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women
title_fullStr Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women
title_short Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women
title_sort evaluation of sars-cov-2 vaccination in pregnant and breastfeeding women
topic Coronavirus (COVID-19) Collection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.06.002
work_keys_str_mv AT tereziaharvanova evaluationofsarscov2vaccinationinpregnantandbreastfeedingwomen
AT zuzanakobliskova evaluationofsarscov2vaccinationinpregnantandbreastfeedingwomen
AT petrnovak evaluationofsarscov2vaccinationinpregnantandbreastfeedingwomen