Cargando…
Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation
Demand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208376120 |
_version_ | 1785058654082301952 |
---|---|
author | Hoang, Nguyen Tien Taherzadeh, Oliver Ohashi, Haruka Yonekura, Yusuke Nishijima, Shota Yamabe, Masaki Matsui, Tetsuya Matsuda, Hiroyuki Moran, Daniel Kanemoto, Keiichiro |
author_facet | Hoang, Nguyen Tien Taherzadeh, Oliver Ohashi, Haruka Yonekura, Yusuke Nishijima, Shota Yamabe, Masaki Matsui, Tetsuya Matsuda, Hiroyuki Moran, Daniel Kanemoto, Keiichiro |
author_sort | Hoang, Nguyen Tien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Demand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade data, we estimate current potential conservation risk hotspots driven by 197 countries across 48 agricultural products. Globally, a third of agricultural production occurs in sites of high CP (CP > 0.75, max = 1.0). While cattle, maize, rice, and soybean pose the greatest threat to very high-CP sites, other low-conservation risk products (e.g., sugar beet, pearl millet, and sunflower) currently are less likely to be grown in sites of agriculture–conservation conflict. Our analysis suggests that a commodity can cause dissimilar conservation threats in different production regions. Accordingly, some of the conservation risks posed by different countries depend on their demand and sourcing patterns of agricultural commodities. Our spatial analyses identify potential hotspots of competition between agriculture and high-conservation value sites (i.e., 0.5° resolution, or ~367 to 3,077km(2), grid cells containing both agriculture and high-biodiversity priority habitat), thereby providing additional information that could help prioritize conservation activities and safeguard biodiversity in individual countries and globally. A web-based GIS tool at https://agriculture.spatialfootprint.com/biodiversity/ systematically visualizes the results of our analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10266011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102660112023-06-15 Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation Hoang, Nguyen Tien Taherzadeh, Oliver Ohashi, Haruka Yonekura, Yusuke Nishijima, Shota Yamabe, Masaki Matsui, Tetsuya Matsuda, Hiroyuki Moran, Daniel Kanemoto, Keiichiro Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Demand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade data, we estimate current potential conservation risk hotspots driven by 197 countries across 48 agricultural products. Globally, a third of agricultural production occurs in sites of high CP (CP > 0.75, max = 1.0). While cattle, maize, rice, and soybean pose the greatest threat to very high-CP sites, other low-conservation risk products (e.g., sugar beet, pearl millet, and sunflower) currently are less likely to be grown in sites of agriculture–conservation conflict. Our analysis suggests that a commodity can cause dissimilar conservation threats in different production regions. Accordingly, some of the conservation risks posed by different countries depend on their demand and sourcing patterns of agricultural commodities. Our spatial analyses identify potential hotspots of competition between agriculture and high-conservation value sites (i.e., 0.5° resolution, or ~367 to 3,077km(2), grid cells containing both agriculture and high-biodiversity priority habitat), thereby providing additional information that could help prioritize conservation activities and safeguard biodiversity in individual countries and globally. A web-based GIS tool at https://agriculture.spatialfootprint.com/biodiversity/ systematically visualizes the results of our analyses. National Academy of Sciences 2023-05-30 2023-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10266011/ /pubmed/37252987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208376120 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Biological Sciences Hoang, Nguyen Tien Taherzadeh, Oliver Ohashi, Haruka Yonekura, Yusuke Nishijima, Shota Yamabe, Masaki Matsui, Tetsuya Matsuda, Hiroyuki Moran, Daniel Kanemoto, Keiichiro Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation |
title | Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation |
title_full | Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation |
title_fullStr | Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation |
title_full_unstemmed | Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation |
title_short | Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation |
title_sort | mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation |
topic | Biological Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208376120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoangnguyentien mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT taherzadeholiver mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT ohashiharuka mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT yonekurayusuke mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT nishijimashota mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT yamabemasaki mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT matsuitetsuya mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT matsudahiroyuki mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT morandaniel mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation AT kanemotokeiichiro mappingpotentialconflictsbetweenglobalagricultureandterrestrialconservation |