Cargando…

P15 Direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy.(1) Over 90% of these are mislabelled(1). Labelled penicillin allergy is associated with increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use, increased antibiotic costs, and increased length of admission. A recent meta-analysis of delabel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugrue, Ellen, McKee, Edward D H, Sutherland, Rebecca K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266149/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad066.019
_version_ 1785058685022633984
author Sugrue, Ellen
McKee, Edward D H
Sutherland, Rebecca K
author_facet Sugrue, Ellen
McKee, Edward D H
Sutherland, Rebecca K
author_sort Sugrue, Ellen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy.(1) Over 90% of these are mislabelled(1). Labelled penicillin allergy is associated with increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use, increased antibiotic costs, and increased length of admission. A recent meta-analysis of delabelling studies showed that drug provocation test (DPT) is a low-risk procedure in patients with multiple clinical and financial benefits.(2) METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients who had DPT in hospital across one health trust 2019–2022. Hospital and GP electronic records of drug allergies were reviewed. GPs of patients who retained an allergy status post-DPT were contacted. RESULTS: 46 DPTs were documented during this time. The PENFAST(3) score was used to identify those suitable for DPT. One delayed reaction was recorded. No anaphylaxis was recorded. Infectious diseases were the primary specialty for DPT (67%). In total, 78% were carried out on medical patients. ID consult service was responsible for 100% of DPTs in surgical specialties. Seven patients who received DPT had been relabelled penicillin allergic post-DPT. Two were self-reported on presentation to hospital. Five were from physician review of historic documentation in hospital settings. In total, 56% of patients had not had GP documentation regarding allergy status updated. CONCLUSIONS: This review concludes that DPT is safe in an inpatient population and inpatient review of reported penicillin allergy is an opportunity to identify mislabelled allergy. Infection specialists were the primary teams for DPT however given the safety profile of the DPT non-infection, and allergy specialists should be encouraged to use the protocol. Enhanced communication is needed with GPs to ensure the correct status is known in the community. Relabelling of penicillin allergy is a risk, and further education must be given to patients and healthcare providers post-DPT to ensure continuation of delabelled status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10266149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102661492023-06-15 P15 Direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review Sugrue, Ellen McKee, Edward D H Sutherland, Rebecca K JAC Antimicrob Resist Abstracts BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy.(1) Over 90% of these are mislabelled(1). Labelled penicillin allergy is associated with increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use, increased antibiotic costs, and increased length of admission. A recent meta-analysis of delabelling studies showed that drug provocation test (DPT) is a low-risk procedure in patients with multiple clinical and financial benefits.(2) METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients who had DPT in hospital across one health trust 2019–2022. Hospital and GP electronic records of drug allergies were reviewed. GPs of patients who retained an allergy status post-DPT were contacted. RESULTS: 46 DPTs were documented during this time. The PENFAST(3) score was used to identify those suitable for DPT. One delayed reaction was recorded. No anaphylaxis was recorded. Infectious diseases were the primary specialty for DPT (67%). In total, 78% were carried out on medical patients. ID consult service was responsible for 100% of DPTs in surgical specialties. Seven patients who received DPT had been relabelled penicillin allergic post-DPT. Two were self-reported on presentation to hospital. Five were from physician review of historic documentation in hospital settings. In total, 56% of patients had not had GP documentation regarding allergy status updated. CONCLUSIONS: This review concludes that DPT is safe in an inpatient population and inpatient review of reported penicillin allergy is an opportunity to identify mislabelled allergy. Infection specialists were the primary teams for DPT however given the safety profile of the DPT non-infection, and allergy specialists should be encouraged to use the protocol. Enhanced communication is needed with GPs to ensure the correct status is known in the community. Relabelling of penicillin allergy is a risk, and further education must be given to patients and healthcare providers post-DPT to ensure continuation of delabelled status. Oxford University Press 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10266149/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad066.019 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sugrue, Ellen
McKee, Edward D H
Sutherland, Rebecca K
P15 Direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review
title P15 Direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review
title_full P15 Direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review
title_fullStr P15 Direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review
title_full_unstemmed P15 Direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review
title_short P15 Direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review
title_sort p15 direct provocation test for penicillin allergy delabelling: a 4-year retrospective review
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266149/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad066.019
work_keys_str_mv AT sugrueellen p15directprovocationtestforpenicillinallergydelabellinga4yearretrospectivereview
AT mckeeedwarddh p15directprovocationtestforpenicillinallergydelabellinga4yearretrospectivereview
AT sutherlandrebeccak p15directprovocationtestforpenicillinallergydelabellinga4yearretrospectivereview