Cargando…
Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis
BACKGROUND: Moderate severity aortic stenosis (AS) is poorly understood, is associated with subclinical myocardial dysfunction, and can lead to adverse outcome rates that are comparable to severe AS. Factors associated with progressive myocardial dysfunction in moderate AS are not well described. Ar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1153814 |
_version_ | 1785058711076601856 |
---|---|
author | Namasivayam, Mayooran Meredith, Thomas Muller, David W. M. Roy, David A. Roy, Andrew K. Kovacic, Jason C. Hayward, Christopher S. Feneley, Michael P. |
author_facet | Namasivayam, Mayooran Meredith, Thomas Muller, David W. M. Roy, David A. Roy, Andrew K. Kovacic, Jason C. Hayward, Christopher S. Feneley, Michael P. |
author_sort | Namasivayam, Mayooran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Moderate severity aortic stenosis (AS) is poorly understood, is associated with subclinical myocardial dysfunction, and can lead to adverse outcome rates that are comparable to severe AS. Factors associated with progressive myocardial dysfunction in moderate AS are not well described. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can identify patterns, inform clinical risk, and identify features of importance in clinical datasets. METHODS: We conducted ANN analyses on longitudinal echocardiographic data collected from 66 individuals with moderate AS who underwent serial echocardiography at our institution. Image phenotyping involved left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) and valve stenosis severity (including energetics) analysis. ANNs were constructed using two multilayer perceptron models. The first model was developed to predict change in GLS from baseline echocardiography alone and the second to predict change in GLS using data from baseline and serial echocardiography. ANNs used a single hidden layer architecture and a 70%:30% training/testing split. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up interval of 1.3 years, change in GLS (≤ or >median change) could be predicted with accuracy rates of 95% in training and 93% in testing using ANN with inputs from baseline echocardiogram data alone (AUC: 0.997). The four most important predictive baseline features (reported as normalized % importance relative to most important feature) were peak gradient (100%), energy loss (93%), GLS (80%), and DI < 0.25 (50%). When a further model was run including inputs from both baseline and serial echocardiography (AUC 0.844), the top four features of importance were change in dimensionless index between index and follow-up studies (100%), baseline peak gradient (79%), baseline energy loss (72%), and baseline GLS (63%). CONCLUSIONS: Artificial neural networks can predict progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction with high accuracy in moderate AS and identify features of importance. Key features associated with classifying progression in subclinical myocardial dysfunction included peak gradient, dimensionless index, GLS, and hydraulic load (energy loss), suggesting that these features should be closely evaluated and monitored in AS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10266266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102662662023-06-15 Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis Namasivayam, Mayooran Meredith, Thomas Muller, David W. M. Roy, David A. Roy, Andrew K. Kovacic, Jason C. Hayward, Christopher S. Feneley, Michael P. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Moderate severity aortic stenosis (AS) is poorly understood, is associated with subclinical myocardial dysfunction, and can lead to adverse outcome rates that are comparable to severe AS. Factors associated with progressive myocardial dysfunction in moderate AS are not well described. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can identify patterns, inform clinical risk, and identify features of importance in clinical datasets. METHODS: We conducted ANN analyses on longitudinal echocardiographic data collected from 66 individuals with moderate AS who underwent serial echocardiography at our institution. Image phenotyping involved left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) and valve stenosis severity (including energetics) analysis. ANNs were constructed using two multilayer perceptron models. The first model was developed to predict change in GLS from baseline echocardiography alone and the second to predict change in GLS using data from baseline and serial echocardiography. ANNs used a single hidden layer architecture and a 70%:30% training/testing split. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up interval of 1.3 years, change in GLS (≤ or >median change) could be predicted with accuracy rates of 95% in training and 93% in testing using ANN with inputs from baseline echocardiogram data alone (AUC: 0.997). The four most important predictive baseline features (reported as normalized % importance relative to most important feature) were peak gradient (100%), energy loss (93%), GLS (80%), and DI < 0.25 (50%). When a further model was run including inputs from both baseline and serial echocardiography (AUC 0.844), the top four features of importance were change in dimensionless index between index and follow-up studies (100%), baseline peak gradient (79%), baseline energy loss (72%), and baseline GLS (63%). CONCLUSIONS: Artificial neural networks can predict progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction with high accuracy in moderate AS and identify features of importance. Key features associated with classifying progression in subclinical myocardial dysfunction included peak gradient, dimensionless index, GLS, and hydraulic load (energy loss), suggesting that these features should be closely evaluated and monitored in AS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10266266/ /pubmed/37324638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1153814 Text en © 2023 Namasivayam, Meredith, Muller, Roy, Roy, Kovacic, Hayward and Feneley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Namasivayam, Mayooran Meredith, Thomas Muller, David W. M. Roy, David A. Roy, Andrew K. Kovacic, Jason C. Hayward, Christopher S. Feneley, Michael P. Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis |
title | Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis |
title_full | Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis |
title_fullStr | Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis |
title_short | Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis |
title_sort | machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1153814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT namasivayammayooran machinelearningpredictionofprogressivesubclinicalmyocardialdysfunctioninmoderateaorticstenosis AT merediththomas machinelearningpredictionofprogressivesubclinicalmyocardialdysfunctioninmoderateaorticstenosis AT mullerdavidwm machinelearningpredictionofprogressivesubclinicalmyocardialdysfunctioninmoderateaorticstenosis AT roydavida machinelearningpredictionofprogressivesubclinicalmyocardialdysfunctioninmoderateaorticstenosis AT royandrewk machinelearningpredictionofprogressivesubclinicalmyocardialdysfunctioninmoderateaorticstenosis AT kovacicjasonc machinelearningpredictionofprogressivesubclinicalmyocardialdysfunctioninmoderateaorticstenosis AT haywardchristophers machinelearningpredictionofprogressivesubclinicalmyocardialdysfunctioninmoderateaorticstenosis AT feneleymichaelp machinelearningpredictionofprogressivesubclinicalmyocardialdysfunctioninmoderateaorticstenosis |