Cargando…

Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries

OBJECTIVE: To explore hierarchical condition categories (HCC) risk score variation among Florida Fee for Service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries between 2016 and 2018. DATA SOURCES: This study analyzed HCC risk score variation using Medicare claims data for Florida beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A &am...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Molly, Morris, Earl, Haleem, Zuhair, Mandato, Nicholas, Marlow, Nicole M, Revere, Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323190
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S401474
_version_ 1785058732733890560
author Jacobs, Molly
Morris, Earl
Haleem, Zuhair
Mandato, Nicholas
Marlow, Nicole M
Revere, Lee
author_facet Jacobs, Molly
Morris, Earl
Haleem, Zuhair
Mandato, Nicholas
Marlow, Nicole M
Revere, Lee
author_sort Jacobs, Molly
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore hierarchical condition categories (HCC) risk score variation among Florida Fee for Service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries between 2016 and 2018. DATA SOURCES: This study analyzed HCC risk score variation using Medicare claims data for Florida beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A & B between 2016 and 2018. STUDY DESIGN: The CMS methodology analyzed HCC risk score variation using annual mean county- and beneficiary-level risk score changes. The association between variation and beneficiary characteristics, diagnoses, and geographic location was characterized using mixed-effects negative binomial regression models. DATA COLLECTION: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Counties in the Northeast [marginal effect (ME)=−0.003], Central (ME=−0.021), and Southwest (ME=−0.009) Florida have relatively lower mean risk scores. A higher number of lifetime (ME=0.246) and treatable (ME=0.288) conditions were associated with higher county-level risk scores, while more preventable conditions (ME=−0.249) were associated with lower risk scores. Counties with older beneficiaries (ME=0.015) and more Blacks (ME=0.070) have higher risk scores, while having female beneficiaries reduced risk scores (ME=−0.005). Individual risk scores did not vary by age (ME=0.000), but Blacks (ME=0.001) had higher rates of variation relative to Whites, while other races had comparatively lower variation (ME=−0.003). In addition, individuals diagnosed with more lifetime (ME=0.129), treatable (ME=0.235), and preventable (ME=0.001) conditions had higher risk score variation. Most condition-specific indicators showed small associations with risk score changes; however, metastatic cancer/acute leukemia, respirator dependence/tracheostomy, and pressure ulcers of the skin were significantly associated with both types of HCC risk score variation. CONCLUSION: Results showed demographics, HCC condition classifications (ie, lifetime, preventable, and treatable), and some specific conditions were associated with higher variation in mean county-level and individual risk scores. Results suggest consistent coding and reductions in the prevalence of certain treatable or preventable conditions could reduce the county and individual HCC risk score year-to-year change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10266376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102663762023-06-15 Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries Jacobs, Molly Morris, Earl Haleem, Zuhair Mandato, Nicholas Marlow, Nicole M Revere, Lee Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research OBJECTIVE: To explore hierarchical condition categories (HCC) risk score variation among Florida Fee for Service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries between 2016 and 2018. DATA SOURCES: This study analyzed HCC risk score variation using Medicare claims data for Florida beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A & B between 2016 and 2018. STUDY DESIGN: The CMS methodology analyzed HCC risk score variation using annual mean county- and beneficiary-level risk score changes. The association between variation and beneficiary characteristics, diagnoses, and geographic location was characterized using mixed-effects negative binomial regression models. DATA COLLECTION: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Counties in the Northeast [marginal effect (ME)=−0.003], Central (ME=−0.021), and Southwest (ME=−0.009) Florida have relatively lower mean risk scores. A higher number of lifetime (ME=0.246) and treatable (ME=0.288) conditions were associated with higher county-level risk scores, while more preventable conditions (ME=−0.249) were associated with lower risk scores. Counties with older beneficiaries (ME=0.015) and more Blacks (ME=0.070) have higher risk scores, while having female beneficiaries reduced risk scores (ME=−0.005). Individual risk scores did not vary by age (ME=0.000), but Blacks (ME=0.001) had higher rates of variation relative to Whites, while other races had comparatively lower variation (ME=−0.003). In addition, individuals diagnosed with more lifetime (ME=0.129), treatable (ME=0.235), and preventable (ME=0.001) conditions had higher risk score variation. Most condition-specific indicators showed small associations with risk score changes; however, metastatic cancer/acute leukemia, respirator dependence/tracheostomy, and pressure ulcers of the skin were significantly associated with both types of HCC risk score variation. CONCLUSION: Results showed demographics, HCC condition classifications (ie, lifetime, preventable, and treatable), and some specific conditions were associated with higher variation in mean county-level and individual risk scores. Results suggest consistent coding and reductions in the prevalence of certain treatable or preventable conditions could reduce the county and individual HCC risk score year-to-year change. Dove 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10266376/ /pubmed/37323190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S401474 Text en © 2023 Jacobs et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Jacobs, Molly
Morris, Earl
Haleem, Zuhair
Mandato, Nicholas
Marlow, Nicole M
Revere, Lee
Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries
title Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries
title_full Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries
title_fullStr Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries
title_full_unstemmed Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries
title_short Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries
title_sort drivers of individual and regional variation in cms hierarchical condition categories among florida beneficiaries
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323190
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S401474
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsmolly driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries
AT morrisearl driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries
AT haleemzuhair driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries
AT mandatonicholas driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries
AT marlownicolem driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries
AT reverelee driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries