Cargando…
Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries
OBJECTIVE: To explore hierarchical condition categories (HCC) risk score variation among Florida Fee for Service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries between 2016 and 2018. DATA SOURCES: This study analyzed HCC risk score variation using Medicare claims data for Florida beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A &am...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S401474 |
_version_ | 1785058732733890560 |
---|---|
author | Jacobs, Molly Morris, Earl Haleem, Zuhair Mandato, Nicholas Marlow, Nicole M Revere, Lee |
author_facet | Jacobs, Molly Morris, Earl Haleem, Zuhair Mandato, Nicholas Marlow, Nicole M Revere, Lee |
author_sort | Jacobs, Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore hierarchical condition categories (HCC) risk score variation among Florida Fee for Service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries between 2016 and 2018. DATA SOURCES: This study analyzed HCC risk score variation using Medicare claims data for Florida beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A & B between 2016 and 2018. STUDY DESIGN: The CMS methodology analyzed HCC risk score variation using annual mean county- and beneficiary-level risk score changes. The association between variation and beneficiary characteristics, diagnoses, and geographic location was characterized using mixed-effects negative binomial regression models. DATA COLLECTION: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Counties in the Northeast [marginal effect (ME)=−0.003], Central (ME=−0.021), and Southwest (ME=−0.009) Florida have relatively lower mean risk scores. A higher number of lifetime (ME=0.246) and treatable (ME=0.288) conditions were associated with higher county-level risk scores, while more preventable conditions (ME=−0.249) were associated with lower risk scores. Counties with older beneficiaries (ME=0.015) and more Blacks (ME=0.070) have higher risk scores, while having female beneficiaries reduced risk scores (ME=−0.005). Individual risk scores did not vary by age (ME=0.000), but Blacks (ME=0.001) had higher rates of variation relative to Whites, while other races had comparatively lower variation (ME=−0.003). In addition, individuals diagnosed with more lifetime (ME=0.129), treatable (ME=0.235), and preventable (ME=0.001) conditions had higher risk score variation. Most condition-specific indicators showed small associations with risk score changes; however, metastatic cancer/acute leukemia, respirator dependence/tracheostomy, and pressure ulcers of the skin were significantly associated with both types of HCC risk score variation. CONCLUSION: Results showed demographics, HCC condition classifications (ie, lifetime, preventable, and treatable), and some specific conditions were associated with higher variation in mean county-level and individual risk scores. Results suggest consistent coding and reductions in the prevalence of certain treatable or preventable conditions could reduce the county and individual HCC risk score year-to-year change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10266376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102663762023-06-15 Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries Jacobs, Molly Morris, Earl Haleem, Zuhair Mandato, Nicholas Marlow, Nicole M Revere, Lee Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research OBJECTIVE: To explore hierarchical condition categories (HCC) risk score variation among Florida Fee for Service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries between 2016 and 2018. DATA SOURCES: This study analyzed HCC risk score variation using Medicare claims data for Florida beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A & B between 2016 and 2018. STUDY DESIGN: The CMS methodology analyzed HCC risk score variation using annual mean county- and beneficiary-level risk score changes. The association between variation and beneficiary characteristics, diagnoses, and geographic location was characterized using mixed-effects negative binomial regression models. DATA COLLECTION: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Counties in the Northeast [marginal effect (ME)=−0.003], Central (ME=−0.021), and Southwest (ME=−0.009) Florida have relatively lower mean risk scores. A higher number of lifetime (ME=0.246) and treatable (ME=0.288) conditions were associated with higher county-level risk scores, while more preventable conditions (ME=−0.249) were associated with lower risk scores. Counties with older beneficiaries (ME=0.015) and more Blacks (ME=0.070) have higher risk scores, while having female beneficiaries reduced risk scores (ME=−0.005). Individual risk scores did not vary by age (ME=0.000), but Blacks (ME=0.001) had higher rates of variation relative to Whites, while other races had comparatively lower variation (ME=−0.003). In addition, individuals diagnosed with more lifetime (ME=0.129), treatable (ME=0.235), and preventable (ME=0.001) conditions had higher risk score variation. Most condition-specific indicators showed small associations with risk score changes; however, metastatic cancer/acute leukemia, respirator dependence/tracheostomy, and pressure ulcers of the skin were significantly associated with both types of HCC risk score variation. CONCLUSION: Results showed demographics, HCC condition classifications (ie, lifetime, preventable, and treatable), and some specific conditions were associated with higher variation in mean county-level and individual risk scores. Results suggest consistent coding and reductions in the prevalence of certain treatable or preventable conditions could reduce the county and individual HCC risk score year-to-year change. Dove 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10266376/ /pubmed/37323190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S401474 Text en © 2023 Jacobs et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jacobs, Molly Morris, Earl Haleem, Zuhair Mandato, Nicholas Marlow, Nicole M Revere, Lee Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries |
title | Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries |
title_full | Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries |
title_fullStr | Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries |
title_full_unstemmed | Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries |
title_short | Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries |
title_sort | drivers of individual and regional variation in cms hierarchical condition categories among florida beneficiaries |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S401474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobsmolly driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries AT morrisearl driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries AT haleemzuhair driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries AT mandatonicholas driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries AT marlownicolem driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries AT reverelee driversofindividualandregionalvariationincmshierarchicalconditioncategoriesamongfloridabeneficiaries |