Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic value of the Copenhagen index for ovarian malignancy. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched throughout June 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan 5.3....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37315054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286650 |
_version_ | 1785058782087217152 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Huiling Ma, Shouye Chen, Xiaohong Wu, Huifang Wang, Rongrong Du, Mengmeng Nie, Xiazi |
author_facet | Liu, Huiling Ma, Shouye Chen, Xiaohong Wu, Huifang Wang, Rongrong Du, Mengmeng Nie, Xiazi |
author_sort | Liu, Huiling |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic value of the Copenhagen index for ovarian malignancy. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched throughout June 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan 5.3. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve was calculated. RESULTS: Ten articles, including 11 studies with a total of 5266 patients, were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.82 [95% CI (0.80–0.83)], 0.88 [95% CI (0.87–0.89)], and 57.31 [95% CI (32.84–100.02)], respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve and the Q index were 0.9545 and 0.8966, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review shows that the sensitivity and specificity of the Copenhagen index are high enough for it to be used in a clinical setting to provide accurate ovarian cancer diagnosis without considering menopausal status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10266642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102666422023-06-15 Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis Liu, Huiling Ma, Shouye Chen, Xiaohong Wu, Huifang Wang, Rongrong Du, Mengmeng Nie, Xiazi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic value of the Copenhagen index for ovarian malignancy. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched throughout June 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan 5.3. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve was calculated. RESULTS: Ten articles, including 11 studies with a total of 5266 patients, were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.82 [95% CI (0.80–0.83)], 0.88 [95% CI (0.87–0.89)], and 57.31 [95% CI (32.84–100.02)], respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve and the Q index were 0.9545 and 0.8966, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review shows that the sensitivity and specificity of the Copenhagen index are high enough for it to be used in a clinical setting to provide accurate ovarian cancer diagnosis without considering menopausal status. Public Library of Science 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10266642/ /pubmed/37315054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286650 Text en © 2023 Liu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Huiling Ma, Shouye Chen, Xiaohong Wu, Huifang Wang, Rongrong Du, Mengmeng Nie, Xiazi Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of the copenhagen index in ovarian malignancy: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37315054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286650 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhuiling diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis AT mashouye diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis AT chenxiaohong diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis AT wuhuifang diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis AT wangrongrong diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis AT dumengmeng diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis AT niexiazi diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis |