Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic value of the Copenhagen index for ovarian malignancy. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched throughout June 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan 5.3....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Huiling, Ma, Shouye, Chen, Xiaohong, Wu, Huifang, Wang, Rongrong, Du, Mengmeng, Nie, Xiazi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37315054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286650
_version_ 1785058782087217152
author Liu, Huiling
Ma, Shouye
Chen, Xiaohong
Wu, Huifang
Wang, Rongrong
Du, Mengmeng
Nie, Xiazi
author_facet Liu, Huiling
Ma, Shouye
Chen, Xiaohong
Wu, Huifang
Wang, Rongrong
Du, Mengmeng
Nie, Xiazi
author_sort Liu, Huiling
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic value of the Copenhagen index for ovarian malignancy. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched throughout June 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan 5.3. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve was calculated. RESULTS: Ten articles, including 11 studies with a total of 5266 patients, were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.82 [95% CI (0.80–0.83)], 0.88 [95% CI (0.87–0.89)], and 57.31 [95% CI (32.84–100.02)], respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve and the Q index were 0.9545 and 0.8966, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review shows that the sensitivity and specificity of the Copenhagen index are high enough for it to be used in a clinical setting to provide accurate ovarian cancer diagnosis without considering menopausal status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10266642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102666422023-06-15 Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis Liu, Huiling Ma, Shouye Chen, Xiaohong Wu, Huifang Wang, Rongrong Du, Mengmeng Nie, Xiazi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic value of the Copenhagen index for ovarian malignancy. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched throughout June 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan 5.3. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve was calculated. RESULTS: Ten articles, including 11 studies with a total of 5266 patients, were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.82 [95% CI (0.80–0.83)], 0.88 [95% CI (0.87–0.89)], and 57.31 [95% CI (32.84–100.02)], respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve and the Q index were 0.9545 and 0.8966, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review shows that the sensitivity and specificity of the Copenhagen index are high enough for it to be used in a clinical setting to provide accurate ovarian cancer diagnosis without considering menopausal status. Public Library of Science 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10266642/ /pubmed/37315054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286650 Text en © 2023 Liu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Huiling
Ma, Shouye
Chen, Xiaohong
Wu, Huifang
Wang, Rongrong
Du, Mengmeng
Nie, Xiazi
Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of the copenhagen index in ovarian malignancy: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37315054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286650
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhuiling diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis
AT mashouye diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis
AT chenxiaohong diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis
AT wuhuifang diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis
AT wangrongrong diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis
AT dumengmeng diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis
AT niexiazi diagnosticaccuracyofthecopenhagenindexinovarianmalignancyametaanalysis