Cargando…

Umsetzung der Reform der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie 2017: Ergebnisse aus Fokusgruppen im Rahmen des Innovationsfonds-Projekts EVA PT-RL

Background Mental illnesses cause both individual and social burdens. The main goal of the structural reform of the Psychotherapy Guideline of 2017 was to improve access to psychotherapeutic care. The focus groups, which were conducted as part of the research project “Evaluation of the Psychotherapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abels, Carina, Diekmann, Sandra, Neusser, Silke, Schlierenkamp, Sarah, Wasem, Jürgen, Walendzik, Anke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37044118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1976-1856
Descripción
Sumario:Background Mental illnesses cause both individual and social burdens. The main goal of the structural reform of the Psychotherapy Guideline of 2017 was to improve access to psychotherapeutic care. The focus groups, which were conducted as part of the research project “Evaluation of the Psychotherapy Guideline (Eva PT-RL)” funded by the Innovation Fund, address the implementation of the goals of the reform and the individual newly introduced care elements as well as hurdles to implementation from the perspective of service providers, patients and insurers. Methods Six focus groups and five individual interviews were conducted with people from the three stakeholder groups mentioned above. The basis was a semistructured interview guide adapted to the respective group of people based on a structured literature research. The interviews were conducted by a team of moderators via video conference, recorded and transcribed. The analysis was carried out via a qualitative content analysis based on Mayring. Results The initial psychotherapeutic consultation received a generally positive assessment particularly with regard to timely initial access to psychotherapeutic care. At the same time a delayed transition to subsequent guideline psychotherapy due to a lack of capacity was criticized by all participant groups. Beneficial effects of telephone accessibility as well as increased networking of psychotherapeutic care also with other psychosocial services were mentioned. However the implementation of acute treatment and relapse prophylaxis was found to be inadequate. The central finding was that the impulse for a paradigm shift aimed at by the reform was perceived and implemented differently by the psychotherapists – from a focus on individual therapy processes to a public mental health perspective with a commitment to care coordination. Conclusion Some elements of the reform were criticized by stakeholders, the transition from initial appointments to continuous treatment was considered as not timely enough, and the design of other elements (acute treatment and relapse prevention regulations) was assessed as improvable. There is a need for further research. The results of the focus groups serve as a basis for following project steps including a survey of psychotherapists, patients and GPs.