Cargando…

Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?

ABSTRACT: The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test has high sensitivity in diagnosing and classifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). OBJECTIVES: To describe the immunological pattern of SLE patients through investigating specific antinuclear autoantibodies by enzyme dot immunoassay and studying thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abozaid, Hanan Sayed M., Hefny, Hesham M., Abualfadl, Esam M., Ismail, Mohamad A., Noreldin, Amal K., Eldin, Ahmed N. Nour, Goda, Asmaa M., Ali, Amal H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-023-06577-w
_version_ 1785058851700080640
author Abozaid, Hanan Sayed M.
Hefny, Hesham M.
Abualfadl, Esam M.
Ismail, Mohamad A.
Noreldin, Amal K.
Eldin, Ahmed N. Nour
Goda, Asmaa M.
Ali, Amal H.
author_facet Abozaid, Hanan Sayed M.
Hefny, Hesham M.
Abualfadl, Esam M.
Ismail, Mohamad A.
Noreldin, Amal K.
Eldin, Ahmed N. Nour
Goda, Asmaa M.
Ali, Amal H.
author_sort Abozaid, Hanan Sayed M.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test has high sensitivity in diagnosing and classifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). OBJECTIVES: To describe the immunological pattern of SLE patients through investigating specific antinuclear autoantibodies by enzyme dot immunoassay and studying their frequency in both positive and negative ANA indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIF) cases. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, blood samples from 393 newly diagnosed SLE patients were analyzed using (IIF) on HEp-2 cells and ANA dot immunoassay by automated enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect 19 antibodies. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of the patients are females; their mean age was 37 ± 12.28. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was detected by IIF in 82.4% of cases, with 181 (46.1%) speckled and 167 (42.4%) homogeneous ANA patterns. The majority of patients (96%) demonstrated autoantibodies via EIA. Among the ANA-IIF-negative patients, 97.2% demonstrated autoantibodies. There was a significant difference in the frequency of certain autoantibodies between SLE patients with negative and positive ANA-IIF (1.44 0.73, 3.12 2.09, p = 0.00) respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of analyzing 19 autoantibodies with the ANA staining pattern increased the significance of analyzing the immune profile even if IIF is negative when clinical symptoms strongly suggest SLE diagnosis. Certain autoantibodies may evade staining by the IFA approach while they are present in the patient’s serum, and they may not be detected by the ANA EIA profile if it does not contain that antigenic substrate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10267001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102670012023-06-15 Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond? Abozaid, Hanan Sayed M. Hefny, Hesham M. Abualfadl, Esam M. Ismail, Mohamad A. Noreldin, Amal K. Eldin, Ahmed N. Nour Goda, Asmaa M. Ali, Amal H. Clin Rheumatol Original Article ABSTRACT: The antinuclear antibody (ANA) test has high sensitivity in diagnosing and classifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). OBJECTIVES: To describe the immunological pattern of SLE patients through investigating specific antinuclear autoantibodies by enzyme dot immunoassay and studying their frequency in both positive and negative ANA indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIF) cases. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, blood samples from 393 newly diagnosed SLE patients were analyzed using (IIF) on HEp-2 cells and ANA dot immunoassay by automated enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect 19 antibodies. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of the patients are females; their mean age was 37 ± 12.28. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was detected by IIF in 82.4% of cases, with 181 (46.1%) speckled and 167 (42.4%) homogeneous ANA patterns. The majority of patients (96%) demonstrated autoantibodies via EIA. Among the ANA-IIF-negative patients, 97.2% demonstrated autoantibodies. There was a significant difference in the frequency of certain autoantibodies between SLE patients with negative and positive ANA-IIF (1.44 0.73, 3.12 2.09, p = 0.00) respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of analyzing 19 autoantibodies with the ANA staining pattern increased the significance of analyzing the immune profile even if IIF is negative when clinical symptoms strongly suggest SLE diagnosis. Certain autoantibodies may evade staining by the IFA approach while they are present in the patient’s serum, and they may not be detected by the ANA EIA profile if it does not contain that antigenic substrate. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10267001/ /pubmed/37016193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-023-06577-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Abozaid, Hanan Sayed M.
Hefny, Hesham M.
Abualfadl, Esam M.
Ismail, Mohamad A.
Noreldin, Amal K.
Eldin, Ahmed N. Nour
Goda, Asmaa M.
Ali, Amal H.
Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?
title Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?
title_full Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?
title_fullStr Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?
title_full_unstemmed Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?
title_short Negative ANA-IIF in SLE patients: what is beyond?
title_sort negative ana-iif in sle patients: what is beyond?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-023-06577-w
work_keys_str_mv AT abozaidhanansayedm negativeanaiifinslepatientswhatisbeyond
AT hefnyheshamm negativeanaiifinslepatientswhatisbeyond
AT abualfadlesamm negativeanaiifinslepatientswhatisbeyond
AT ismailmohamada negativeanaiifinslepatientswhatisbeyond
AT noreldinamalk negativeanaiifinslepatientswhatisbeyond
AT eldinahmednnour negativeanaiifinslepatientswhatisbeyond
AT godaasmaam negativeanaiifinslepatientswhatisbeyond
AT aliamalh negativeanaiifinslepatientswhatisbeyond