Cargando…
Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders
OBJECTIVE: The classification of anorexia nervosa (AN) into subtypes is relevant due to their different symptomatology. However, subtypes (restricting type: AN-R; purging type: AN-P) differ also in terms of their personality functioning. Knowledge about these differences would allow for better treat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1155725 |
_version_ | 1785058907312357376 |
---|---|
author | Rohde, Jens Obbarius, Alexander Voigt, Barbara Sarrar, Lea Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke Kind, Clara-Sophia Rose, Matthias Hofmann, Tobias |
author_facet | Rohde, Jens Obbarius, Alexander Voigt, Barbara Sarrar, Lea Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke Kind, Clara-Sophia Rose, Matthias Hofmann, Tobias |
author_sort | Rohde, Jens |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The classification of anorexia nervosa (AN) into subtypes is relevant due to their different symptomatology. However, subtypes (restricting type: AN-R; purging type: AN-P) differ also in terms of their personality functioning. Knowledge about these differences would allow for better treatment stratification. A pilot study indicated differences in structural abilities that can be assessed by the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD) system. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically explore differences in personality functioning and personality between the two AN subtypes and bulimia nervosa (BN) using three personality (functioning) constructs. METHODS: A total of N = 110 inpatients with AN-R (n = 28), AN-P (n = 40), or BN (n = 42) were recruited in three clinics for psychosomatic medicine. Assignment to the three groups was performed using a comprehensive questionnaire validated for diagnostic purposes (Munich-ED-Quest). Personality functioning was examined using OPD Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ), personality by using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form and Big Five Inventory-10. (M)ANOVAs were used to examine differences across eating disorder groups. In addition, correlation and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We observed differences on several sub- and main scales of the OPD-SQ. Whereas patients with BN showed the lowest levels, AN-R patients displayed the highest levels of personality functioning. On some sub- and main scales, such as “affect tolerance,” the subtypes of AN differed from BN, whereas on the scale “affect differentiation,” AN-R, differed from the other two groups. The total eating disorder pathology score of the Munich-ED-Quest best predicted overall personality structure [stand. β = 0.650; t(104) = 6.666; p < 0.001] and self-regulation [stand. β = 0.449; t(104) = 3.628; p < 0.001]. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm most of the results of the pilot study. These findings can facilitate the development of stratified treatment approaches for eating disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10267354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102673542023-06-15 Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders Rohde, Jens Obbarius, Alexander Voigt, Barbara Sarrar, Lea Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke Kind, Clara-Sophia Rose, Matthias Hofmann, Tobias Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVE: The classification of anorexia nervosa (AN) into subtypes is relevant due to their different symptomatology. However, subtypes (restricting type: AN-R; purging type: AN-P) differ also in terms of their personality functioning. Knowledge about these differences would allow for better treatment stratification. A pilot study indicated differences in structural abilities that can be assessed by the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD) system. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically explore differences in personality functioning and personality between the two AN subtypes and bulimia nervosa (BN) using three personality (functioning) constructs. METHODS: A total of N = 110 inpatients with AN-R (n = 28), AN-P (n = 40), or BN (n = 42) were recruited in three clinics for psychosomatic medicine. Assignment to the three groups was performed using a comprehensive questionnaire validated for diagnostic purposes (Munich-ED-Quest). Personality functioning was examined using OPD Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ), personality by using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form and Big Five Inventory-10. (M)ANOVAs were used to examine differences across eating disorder groups. In addition, correlation and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We observed differences on several sub- and main scales of the OPD-SQ. Whereas patients with BN showed the lowest levels, AN-R patients displayed the highest levels of personality functioning. On some sub- and main scales, such as “affect tolerance,” the subtypes of AN differed from BN, whereas on the scale “affect differentiation,” AN-R, differed from the other two groups. The total eating disorder pathology score of the Munich-ED-Quest best predicted overall personality structure [stand. β = 0.650; t(104) = 6.666; p < 0.001] and self-regulation [stand. β = 0.449; t(104) = 3.628; p < 0.001]. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm most of the results of the pilot study. These findings can facilitate the development of stratified treatment approaches for eating disorders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10267354/ /pubmed/37324816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1155725 Text en Copyright © 2023 Rohde, Obbarius, Voigt, Sarrar, Biesenthal-Matthes, Kind, Rose and Hofmann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Rohde, Jens Obbarius, Alexander Voigt, Barbara Sarrar, Lea Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke Kind, Clara-Sophia Rose, Matthias Hofmann, Tobias Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders |
title | Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders |
title_full | Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders |
title_fullStr | Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders |
title_short | Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders |
title_sort | differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1155725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rohdejens differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders AT obbariusalexander differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders AT voigtbarbara differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders AT sarrarlea differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders AT biesenthalmatthessilke differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders AT kindclarasophia differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders AT rosematthias differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders AT hofmanntobias differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders |