Cargando…

Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders

OBJECTIVE: The classification of anorexia nervosa (AN) into subtypes is relevant due to their different symptomatology. However, subtypes (restricting type: AN-R; purging type: AN-P) differ also in terms of their personality functioning. Knowledge about these differences would allow for better treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rohde, Jens, Obbarius, Alexander, Voigt, Barbara, Sarrar, Lea, Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke, Kind, Clara-Sophia, Rose, Matthias, Hofmann, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1155725
_version_ 1785058907312357376
author Rohde, Jens
Obbarius, Alexander
Voigt, Barbara
Sarrar, Lea
Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke
Kind, Clara-Sophia
Rose, Matthias
Hofmann, Tobias
author_facet Rohde, Jens
Obbarius, Alexander
Voigt, Barbara
Sarrar, Lea
Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke
Kind, Clara-Sophia
Rose, Matthias
Hofmann, Tobias
author_sort Rohde, Jens
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The classification of anorexia nervosa (AN) into subtypes is relevant due to their different symptomatology. However, subtypes (restricting type: AN-R; purging type: AN-P) differ also in terms of their personality functioning. Knowledge about these differences would allow for better treatment stratification. A pilot study indicated differences in structural abilities that can be assessed by the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD) system. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically explore differences in personality functioning and personality between the two AN subtypes and bulimia nervosa (BN) using three personality (functioning) constructs. METHODS: A total of N = 110 inpatients with AN-R (n = 28), AN-P (n = 40), or BN (n = 42) were recruited in three clinics for psychosomatic medicine. Assignment to the three groups was performed using a comprehensive questionnaire validated for diagnostic purposes (Munich-ED-Quest). Personality functioning was examined using OPD Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ), personality by using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form and Big Five Inventory-10. (M)ANOVAs were used to examine differences across eating disorder groups. In addition, correlation and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We observed differences on several sub- and main scales of the OPD-SQ. Whereas patients with BN showed the lowest levels, AN-R patients displayed the highest levels of personality functioning. On some sub- and main scales, such as “affect tolerance,” the subtypes of AN differed from BN, whereas on the scale “affect differentiation,” AN-R, differed from the other two groups. The total eating disorder pathology score of the Munich-ED-Quest best predicted overall personality structure [stand. β = 0.650; t(104) = 6.666; p < 0.001] and self-regulation [stand. β = 0.449; t(104) = 3.628; p < 0.001]. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm most of the results of the pilot study. These findings can facilitate the development of stratified treatment approaches for eating disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10267354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102673542023-06-15 Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders Rohde, Jens Obbarius, Alexander Voigt, Barbara Sarrar, Lea Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke Kind, Clara-Sophia Rose, Matthias Hofmann, Tobias Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVE: The classification of anorexia nervosa (AN) into subtypes is relevant due to their different symptomatology. However, subtypes (restricting type: AN-R; purging type: AN-P) differ also in terms of their personality functioning. Knowledge about these differences would allow for better treatment stratification. A pilot study indicated differences in structural abilities that can be assessed by the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD) system. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically explore differences in personality functioning and personality between the two AN subtypes and bulimia nervosa (BN) using three personality (functioning) constructs. METHODS: A total of N = 110 inpatients with AN-R (n = 28), AN-P (n = 40), or BN (n = 42) were recruited in three clinics for psychosomatic medicine. Assignment to the three groups was performed using a comprehensive questionnaire validated for diagnostic purposes (Munich-ED-Quest). Personality functioning was examined using OPD Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ), personality by using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form and Big Five Inventory-10. (M)ANOVAs were used to examine differences across eating disorder groups. In addition, correlation and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We observed differences on several sub- and main scales of the OPD-SQ. Whereas patients with BN showed the lowest levels, AN-R patients displayed the highest levels of personality functioning. On some sub- and main scales, such as “affect tolerance,” the subtypes of AN differed from BN, whereas on the scale “affect differentiation,” AN-R, differed from the other two groups. The total eating disorder pathology score of the Munich-ED-Quest best predicted overall personality structure [stand. β = 0.650; t(104) = 6.666; p < 0.001] and self-regulation [stand. β = 0.449; t(104) = 3.628; p < 0.001]. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm most of the results of the pilot study. These findings can facilitate the development of stratified treatment approaches for eating disorders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10267354/ /pubmed/37324816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1155725 Text en Copyright © 2023 Rohde, Obbarius, Voigt, Sarrar, Biesenthal-Matthes, Kind, Rose and Hofmann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Rohde, Jens
Obbarius, Alexander
Voigt, Barbara
Sarrar, Lea
Biesenthal-Matthes, Silke
Kind, Clara-Sophia
Rose, Matthias
Hofmann, Tobias
Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders
title Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders
title_full Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders
title_fullStr Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders
title_full_unstemmed Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders
title_short Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders
title_sort differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1155725
work_keys_str_mv AT rohdejens differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders
AT obbariusalexander differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders
AT voigtbarbara differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders
AT sarrarlea differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders
AT biesenthalmatthessilke differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders
AT kindclarasophia differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders
AT rosematthias differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders
AT hofmanntobias differencesandsimilaritiesinpersonalityfunctioningacrossdifferenttypesofeatingdisorders