Cargando…

Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conclude the quality of critically systematic reviews (SRs) of the efficacy of family-centered interventions on perinatal depression. METHODS: SRs of the efficacy of family-centered interventions on perinatal depression were systematically searched in nine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Liping, Soh, Kim Lam, Yu, Jiaxiang, Chen, Aixiang, Dong, Xiujuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094360
_version_ 1785058912375930880
author He, Liping
Soh, Kim Lam
Yu, Jiaxiang
Chen, Aixiang
Dong, Xiujuan
author_facet He, Liping
Soh, Kim Lam
Yu, Jiaxiang
Chen, Aixiang
Dong, Xiujuan
author_sort He, Liping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conclude the quality of critically systematic reviews (SRs) of the efficacy of family-centered interventions on perinatal depression. METHODS: SRs of the efficacy of family-centered interventions on perinatal depression were systematically searched in nine databases. The retrieval period was from the inception of the database to December 31, 2022. In addition, two reviewers conducted an independent evaluation of the quality of reporting, bias risk, methodologies, and evidence using ROBIS (an instrument for evaluating the bias risk of SRs), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), AMSTAR 2 (an assessment tool for SRs), and grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS: A total of eight papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. In particular, AMSTAR 2 rated five SRs as extremely low quality and three SRs as low quality. ROBIS graded four out of eight SRs as “low risk.” Regarding PRISMA, four of the eight SRs were rated over 50%. Based on the GRADE tool, two out of six SRs rated maternal depressive symptoms as “moderate;” one out of five SRs rated paternal depressive symptoms as “moderate;” one out of six SRs estimated family functioning as “moderate,” and the other evidence was rated as “very low” or “low.” Of the eight SRs, six (75%) reported that maternal depressive symptoms were significantly reduced, and two SRs (25%) were not reported. CONCLUSION: Family-centered interventions may improve maternal depressive symptoms and family function, but not paternal depressive symptoms. However, the quality of methodologies, evidence, reporting, and bias of risk in the included SRs of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression was not satisfactory. The above-mentioned demerits may negatively affect SRs and then cause inconsistent outcomes. Therefore, SRs with a low risk of bias, high-quality evidence, standard reporting, and strict methodology are necessary to provide evidence of the efficacy of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10267375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102673752023-06-15 Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews He, Liping Soh, Kim Lam Yu, Jiaxiang Chen, Aixiang Dong, Xiujuan Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and conclude the quality of critically systematic reviews (SRs) of the efficacy of family-centered interventions on perinatal depression. METHODS: SRs of the efficacy of family-centered interventions on perinatal depression were systematically searched in nine databases. The retrieval period was from the inception of the database to December 31, 2022. In addition, two reviewers conducted an independent evaluation of the quality of reporting, bias risk, methodologies, and evidence using ROBIS (an instrument for evaluating the bias risk of SRs), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), AMSTAR 2 (an assessment tool for SRs), and grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS: A total of eight papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. In particular, AMSTAR 2 rated five SRs as extremely low quality and three SRs as low quality. ROBIS graded four out of eight SRs as “low risk.” Regarding PRISMA, four of the eight SRs were rated over 50%. Based on the GRADE tool, two out of six SRs rated maternal depressive symptoms as “moderate;” one out of five SRs rated paternal depressive symptoms as “moderate;” one out of six SRs estimated family functioning as “moderate,” and the other evidence was rated as “very low” or “low.” Of the eight SRs, six (75%) reported that maternal depressive symptoms were significantly reduced, and two SRs (25%) were not reported. CONCLUSION: Family-centered interventions may improve maternal depressive symptoms and family function, but not paternal depressive symptoms. However, the quality of methodologies, evidence, reporting, and bias of risk in the included SRs of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression was not satisfactory. The above-mentioned demerits may negatively affect SRs and then cause inconsistent outcomes. Therefore, SRs with a low risk of bias, high-quality evidence, standard reporting, and strict methodology are necessary to provide evidence of the efficacy of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10267375/ /pubmed/37324817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094360 Text en Copyright © 2023 He, Soh, Yu, Chen and Dong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
He, Liping
Soh, Kim Lam
Yu, Jiaxiang
Chen, Aixiang
Dong, Xiujuan
Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews
title Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews
title_short Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews
title_sort effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094360
work_keys_str_mv AT heliping effectoffamilycenteredinterventionsforperinataldepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT sohkimlam effectoffamilycenteredinterventionsforperinataldepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT yujiaxiang effectoffamilycenteredinterventionsforperinataldepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT chenaixiang effectoffamilycenteredinterventionsforperinataldepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT dongxiujuan effectoffamilycenteredinterventionsforperinataldepressionanoverviewofsystematicreviews