Cargando…

Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Several efficient treatments are available for primary prostate cancer, but an economic comparison of these modalities has not been done in Austria. OBJECTIVE AND SETTING: The current study provides an economic comparison of radiotherapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moll, Matthias, Goldner, Gregor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37325333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1016860
_version_ 1785058912860372992
author Moll, Matthias
Goldner, Gregor
author_facet Moll, Matthias
Goldner, Gregor
author_sort Moll, Matthias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Several efficient treatments are available for primary prostate cancer, but an economic comparison of these modalities has not been done in Austria. OBJECTIVE AND SETTING: The current study provides an economic comparison of radiotherapy and surgery for prostate cancer in Vienna and Austria. METHODS: We analyzed the catalog of medical services of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection and present the treatment costs for the public health sector with an LKF-point value and monetary value in 2022. RESULTS: External beam radiotherapy, especially ultrahypofractionated, is the least costly treatment modality for low-risk prostate cancer, with costs of 2,492 € per treatment. For intermediate-risk prostate cancer, differences between moderate hypofractionation and brachytherapy are small, with costs of 4,638–5,140 €. In a high-risk setting, differences between radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy are small (7,087 € vs. 7474.06 €). CONCLUSION: From a purely financial point of view, treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer in Vienna and Austria should consist of radiotherapy as long as the current catalog of services is up to date. For high-risk prostate cancer, no major difference was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10267377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102673772023-06-15 Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis Moll, Matthias Goldner, Gregor Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Several efficient treatments are available for primary prostate cancer, but an economic comparison of these modalities has not been done in Austria. OBJECTIVE AND SETTING: The current study provides an economic comparison of radiotherapy and surgery for prostate cancer in Vienna and Austria. METHODS: We analyzed the catalog of medical services of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection and present the treatment costs for the public health sector with an LKF-point value and monetary value in 2022. RESULTS: External beam radiotherapy, especially ultrahypofractionated, is the least costly treatment modality for low-risk prostate cancer, with costs of 2,492 € per treatment. For intermediate-risk prostate cancer, differences between moderate hypofractionation and brachytherapy are small, with costs of 4,638–5,140 €. In a high-risk setting, differences between radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy are small (7,087 € vs. 7474.06 €). CONCLUSION: From a purely financial point of view, treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer in Vienna and Austria should consist of radiotherapy as long as the current catalog of services is up to date. For high-risk prostate cancer, no major difference was found. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10267377/ /pubmed/37325333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1016860 Text en Copyright © 2023 Moll and Goldner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Moll, Matthias
Goldner, Gregor
Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis
title Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis
title_full Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis
title_short Comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in Austria and Vienna: an economic analysis
title_sort comparison of treatment costs for primary localized prostate cancer in austria and vienna: an economic analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37325333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1016860
work_keys_str_mv AT mollmatthias comparisonoftreatmentcostsforprimarylocalizedprostatecancerinaustriaandviennaaneconomicanalysis
AT goldnergregor comparisonoftreatmentcostsforprimarylocalizedprostatecancerinaustriaandviennaaneconomicanalysis