Cargando…

COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION. Diagnosis of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is best performed with real-time (quantitative) PCR (qPCR), the most sensitive method for detection and quantification of viral RNA. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol, for each sample tested for the viru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasqualotto, Alessandro C., Seus, Amanda L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Microbiology Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000478.v3
_version_ 1785058971598454784
author Pasqualotto, Alessandro C.
Seus, Amanda L.
author_facet Pasqualotto, Alessandro C.
Seus, Amanda L.
author_sort Pasqualotto, Alessandro C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION. Diagnosis of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is best performed with real-time (quantitative) PCR (qPCR), the most sensitive method for detection and quantification of viral RNA. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol, for each sample tested for the virus, three qPCR tests are performed, targeting the viral genes N1 and N2, in addition to the internal control gene RNase P. Samples in which internal control fails to amplify should be labelled ‘invalid’. METHODS. This study aims to determine the frequency of inhibition of the RNase P gene used as an internal control in qPCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) in a reference hospital in Southern Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February 2021 to 31 March 2021). RESULTS. A total 10, 311 samples were available for analysis. The mean cycle threshold (Ct) value for the RNAse P gene was 26.65 and the standard deviation was 3.18. A total of 252 samples were inhibited (2.4%) during the study period: amongst these, 77 (30.5%) showed late amplifications (beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean Ct value), and 175 (69.4%) revealed no fluorescence at all for the RNase P gene. CONCLUSIONS. This study showed a low percentage of inhibition using RNase P as an internal control in COVID-19 PCRs using the CDC protocol, thus proving the effectiveness of this protocol for identification of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Re-extraction was efficacious for samples that showed little or no fluorescence for the RNase P gene.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10267656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Microbiology Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102676562023-06-15 COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice Pasqualotto, Alessandro C. Seus, Amanda L. Access Microbiol Short Communications INTRODUCTION. Diagnosis of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is best performed with real-time (quantitative) PCR (qPCR), the most sensitive method for detection and quantification of viral RNA. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol, for each sample tested for the virus, three qPCR tests are performed, targeting the viral genes N1 and N2, in addition to the internal control gene RNase P. Samples in which internal control fails to amplify should be labelled ‘invalid’. METHODS. This study aims to determine the frequency of inhibition of the RNase P gene used as an internal control in qPCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) in a reference hospital in Southern Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February 2021 to 31 March 2021). RESULTS. A total 10, 311 samples were available for analysis. The mean cycle threshold (Ct) value for the RNAse P gene was 26.65 and the standard deviation was 3.18. A total of 252 samples were inhibited (2.4%) during the study period: amongst these, 77 (30.5%) showed late amplifications (beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean Ct value), and 175 (69.4%) revealed no fluorescence at all for the RNase P gene. CONCLUSIONS. This study showed a low percentage of inhibition using RNase P as an internal control in COVID-19 PCRs using the CDC protocol, thus proving the effectiveness of this protocol for identification of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Re-extraction was efficacious for samples that showed little or no fluorescence for the RNase P gene. Microbiology Society 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10267656/ /pubmed/37323943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000478.v3 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Short Communications
Pasqualotto, Alessandro C.
Seus, Amanda L.
COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice
title COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice
title_full COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice
title_fullStr COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice
title_short COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice
title_sort covid-19 pcr: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice
topic Short Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000478.v3
work_keys_str_mv AT pasqualottoalessandroc covid19pcrfrequencyofinternalcontrolinhibitioninclinicalpractice
AT seusamandal covid19pcrfrequencyofinternalcontrolinhibitioninclinicalpractice