Cargando…
Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing
BACKGROUND: Incorporating emerging knowledge into Emergency Medical Service (EMS) competency assessments is critical to reflect current evidence-based out-of-hospital care. However, a standardized approach is needed to incorporate new evidence into EMS competency assessments because of the rapid pac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X2300047X |
_version_ | 1785058984787443712 |
---|---|
author | Gage, Christopher B. Terry, Mark McKenna, Kim D. Powell, Jonathan R. Hollern, Megan Ozanich, Matt Richards, Christopher T. Martin-Gill, Christian Panchal, Ashish R. |
author_facet | Gage, Christopher B. Terry, Mark McKenna, Kim D. Powell, Jonathan R. Hollern, Megan Ozanich, Matt Richards, Christopher T. Martin-Gill, Christian Panchal, Ashish R. |
author_sort | Gage, Christopher B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incorporating emerging knowledge into Emergency Medical Service (EMS) competency assessments is critical to reflect current evidence-based out-of-hospital care. However, a standardized approach is needed to incorporate new evidence into EMS competency assessments because of the rapid pace of knowledge generation. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a framework to evaluate and integrate new source material into EMS competency assessments. METHODS: The National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (National Registry) and the Prehospital Guidelines Consortium (PGC) convened a panel of experts. A Delphi method, consisting of virtual meetings and electronic surveys, was used to develop a Table of Evidence matrix that defines sources of EMS evidence. In Round One, participants listed all potential sources of evidence available to inform EMS education. In Round Two, participants categorized these sources into: (a) levels of evidence quality; and (b) type of source material. In Round Three, the panel revised a proposed Table of Evidence. Finally, in Round Four, participants provided recommendations on how each source should be incorporated into competency assessments depending on type and quality. Descriptive statistics were calculated with qualitative analyses conducted by two independent reviewers and a third arbitrator. RESULTS: In Round One, 24 sources of evidence were identified. In Round Two, these were classified into high- (n = 4), medium- (n = 15), and low-quality (n = 5) of evidence, followed by categorization by purpose into providing recommendations (n = 10), primary research (n = 7), and educational content (n = 7). In Round Three, the Table of Evidence was revised based on participant feedback. In Round Four, the panel developed a tiered system of evidence integration from immediate incorporation of high-quality sources to more stringent requirements for lower-quality sources. CONCLUSION: The Table of Evidence provides a framework for the rapid and standardized incorporation of new source material into EMS competency assessments. Future goals are to evaluate the application of the Table of Evidence framework in initial and continued competency assessments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10267721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102677212023-06-15 Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing Gage, Christopher B. Terry, Mark McKenna, Kim D. Powell, Jonathan R. Hollern, Megan Ozanich, Matt Richards, Christopher T. Martin-Gill, Christian Panchal, Ashish R. Prehosp Disaster Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Incorporating emerging knowledge into Emergency Medical Service (EMS) competency assessments is critical to reflect current evidence-based out-of-hospital care. However, a standardized approach is needed to incorporate new evidence into EMS competency assessments because of the rapid pace of knowledge generation. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a framework to evaluate and integrate new source material into EMS competency assessments. METHODS: The National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (National Registry) and the Prehospital Guidelines Consortium (PGC) convened a panel of experts. A Delphi method, consisting of virtual meetings and electronic surveys, was used to develop a Table of Evidence matrix that defines sources of EMS evidence. In Round One, participants listed all potential sources of evidence available to inform EMS education. In Round Two, participants categorized these sources into: (a) levels of evidence quality; and (b) type of source material. In Round Three, the panel revised a proposed Table of Evidence. Finally, in Round Four, participants provided recommendations on how each source should be incorporated into competency assessments depending on type and quality. Descriptive statistics were calculated with qualitative analyses conducted by two independent reviewers and a third arbitrator. RESULTS: In Round One, 24 sources of evidence were identified. In Round Two, these were classified into high- (n = 4), medium- (n = 15), and low-quality (n = 5) of evidence, followed by categorization by purpose into providing recommendations (n = 10), primary research (n = 7), and educational content (n = 7). In Round Three, the Table of Evidence was revised based on participant feedback. In Round Four, the panel developed a tiered system of evidence integration from immediate incorporation of high-quality sources to more stringent requirements for lower-quality sources. CONCLUSION: The Table of Evidence provides a framework for the rapid and standardized incorporation of new source material into EMS competency assessments. Future goals are to evaluate the application of the Table of Evidence framework in initial and continued competency assessments. Cambridge University Press 2023-06 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10267721/ /pubmed/37139715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X2300047X Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gage, Christopher B. Terry, Mark McKenna, Kim D. Powell, Jonathan R. Hollern, Megan Ozanich, Matt Richards, Christopher T. Martin-Gill, Christian Panchal, Ashish R. Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing |
title | Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing |
title_full | Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing |
title_fullStr | Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing |
title_short | Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing |
title_sort | consensus standard for evidence integration into ems education and high-stakes testing |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X2300047X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gagechristopherb consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting AT terrymark consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting AT mckennakimd consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting AT powelljonathanr consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting AT hollernmegan consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting AT ozanichmatt consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting AT richardschristophert consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting AT martingillchristian consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting AT panchalashishr consensusstandardforevidenceintegrationintoemseducationandhighstakestesting |