Cargando…
Reply to Greene: No version of the dual process model can explain rational performance by people who made compromise moral judgments
Autores principales: | Cosmides, Leda, Barbato, María Teresa, Sznycer, Daniel, Labarca, Miguel Ángel, Guzmán, Ricardo Andrés |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10268189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37279262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220909120 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values
por: Guzmán, Ricardo Andrés, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The dual-process theory of moral judgment does not deny that people can make compromise judgments
por: Greene, Joshua D.
Publicado: (2023) -
Explaining the U-Shaped Development of Intent-Based Moral Judgments
por: Margoni, Francesco, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Neural underpinnings of morality judgment and moral aesthetic judgment
por: Cheng, Qiuping, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Validation of the Korean version of the Moral Judgment Scale: A process dissociation approach to moral dilemmas
por: Jang, Eunyoung
Publicado: (2020)