Cargando…

Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term

BACKGROUND: Ventilated infants frequently require supplemental oxygen, but its use should be monitored carefully due to associated complications. The achievement of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) targets can be challenging as neonates experience frequent fluctuations of their oxygen levels that further...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaltsogianni, Ourania, Dassios, Theodore, Jenkinson, Allan, Greenough, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10268377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07415-9
_version_ 1785059079710834688
author Kaltsogianni, Ourania
Dassios, Theodore
Jenkinson, Allan
Greenough, Anne
author_facet Kaltsogianni, Ourania
Dassios, Theodore
Jenkinson, Allan
Greenough, Anne
author_sort Kaltsogianni, Ourania
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventilated infants frequently require supplemental oxygen, but its use should be monitored carefully due to associated complications. The achievement of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) targets can be challenging as neonates experience frequent fluctuations of their oxygen levels that further increase the risk of complications. Closed-loop automated oxygen control systems (CLAC) improve achievement of oxygen saturation targets, reduce hyperoxaemic episodes and facilitate weaning of the inspired oxygen concentration in ventilated infants born at or near term. This study investigates whether CLAC compared with manual oxygen control reduces the time spent in hyperoxia and the overall duration of supplemental oxygen treatment in ventilated infants born at or above 34 weeks gestation. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial performed at a single tertiary neonatal unit is recruiting 40 infants born at or above 34 weeks of gestation and within 24 h of initiation of mechanical ventilation. Infants are randomised to CLAC or manual oxygen control from recruitment till successful extubation. The primary outcome is the percentage of time spent in hyperoxia (SpO(2) > 96%). The secondary outcomes are the overall duration of supplementary oxygen treatment, the percentage of time spent with an oxygen requirement above thirty per cent, the number of days on mechanical ventilation and the length of neonatal unit stay. The study is performed following informed parental consent and was approved by the West Midlands-Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee (Protocol version 1.2, 10/11/2022). DISCUSSION: This trial will investigate the effect of CLAC on the overall duration of oxygen therapy and the time spent in hyperoxia. These are important clinical outcomes as hyperoxic injury is related to oxidative stress that can adversely affect multiple organ systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05657795. Registered on 12/12/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07415-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10268377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102683772023-06-15 Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term Kaltsogianni, Ourania Dassios, Theodore Jenkinson, Allan Greenough, Anne Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Ventilated infants frequently require supplemental oxygen, but its use should be monitored carefully due to associated complications. The achievement of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) targets can be challenging as neonates experience frequent fluctuations of their oxygen levels that further increase the risk of complications. Closed-loop automated oxygen control systems (CLAC) improve achievement of oxygen saturation targets, reduce hyperoxaemic episodes and facilitate weaning of the inspired oxygen concentration in ventilated infants born at or near term. This study investigates whether CLAC compared with manual oxygen control reduces the time spent in hyperoxia and the overall duration of supplemental oxygen treatment in ventilated infants born at or above 34 weeks gestation. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial performed at a single tertiary neonatal unit is recruiting 40 infants born at or above 34 weeks of gestation and within 24 h of initiation of mechanical ventilation. Infants are randomised to CLAC or manual oxygen control from recruitment till successful extubation. The primary outcome is the percentage of time spent in hyperoxia (SpO(2) > 96%). The secondary outcomes are the overall duration of supplementary oxygen treatment, the percentage of time spent with an oxygen requirement above thirty per cent, the number of days on mechanical ventilation and the length of neonatal unit stay. The study is performed following informed parental consent and was approved by the West Midlands-Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee (Protocol version 1.2, 10/11/2022). DISCUSSION: This trial will investigate the effect of CLAC on the overall duration of oxygen therapy and the time spent in hyperoxia. These are important clinical outcomes as hyperoxic injury is related to oxidative stress that can adversely affect multiple organ systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05657795. Registered on 12/12/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07415-9. BioMed Central 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10268377/ /pubmed/37316885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07415-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kaltsogianni, Ourania
Dassios, Theodore
Jenkinson, Allan
Greenough, Anne
Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term
title Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term
title_full Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term
title_fullStr Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term
title_full_unstemmed Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term
title_short Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term
title_sort does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? a randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10268377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07415-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kaltsogianniourania doesclosedloopautomatedoxygencontrolreducethedurationofsupplementaryoxygentreatmentandtheamountoftimespentinhyperoxiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialinventilatedinfantsbornatornearterm
AT dassiostheodore doesclosedloopautomatedoxygencontrolreducethedurationofsupplementaryoxygentreatmentandtheamountoftimespentinhyperoxiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialinventilatedinfantsbornatornearterm
AT jenkinsonallan doesclosedloopautomatedoxygencontrolreducethedurationofsupplementaryoxygentreatmentandtheamountoftimespentinhyperoxiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialinventilatedinfantsbornatornearterm
AT greenoughanne doesclosedloopautomatedoxygencontrolreducethedurationofsupplementaryoxygentreatmentandtheamountoftimespentinhyperoxiaarandomisedcontrolledtrialinventilatedinfantsbornatornearterm