Cargando…

PI‐RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The study aims to propose an optimal workflow in patients with a PI‐RADS 3 (PR‐3) assessment category (AC) through determining the timing and type of pathology interrogation used for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in these men based upon a 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camacho, Andrés, Salah, Fatima, Bay, Camden P., Waring, Jonathan, Umeton, Renato, Hirsch, Michelle S., Cole, Alexander P., Kibel, Adam S., Loda, Massimo, Tempany, Clare M., Fennessy, Fiona M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10268585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.231
_version_ 1785059120912531456
author Camacho, Andrés
Salah, Fatima
Bay, Camden P.
Waring, Jonathan
Umeton, Renato
Hirsch, Michelle S.
Cole, Alexander P.
Kibel, Adam S.
Loda, Massimo
Tempany, Clare M.
Fennessy, Fiona M.
author_facet Camacho, Andrés
Salah, Fatima
Bay, Camden P.
Waring, Jonathan
Umeton, Renato
Hirsch, Michelle S.
Cole, Alexander P.
Kibel, Adam S.
Loda, Massimo
Tempany, Clare M.
Fennessy, Fiona M.
author_sort Camacho, Andrés
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The study aims to propose an optimal workflow in patients with a PI‐RADS 3 (PR‐3) assessment category (AC) through determining the timing and type of pathology interrogation used for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in these men based upon a 5‐year retrospective review in a large academic medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This United States Health Insurance Probability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)‐compliant, institutional review board‐approved retrospective study included men without prior csPCa diagnosis who received PR‐3 AC on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI). Subsequent incidence and time to csPCa diagnosis and number/type of prostate interventions was recorded. Categorical data were compared using Fisher's exact test and continuous data using ANOVA omnibus F‐test. RESULTS: Our cohort of 3238 men identified 332 who received PR‐3 as their highest AC on MRI, 240 (72.3%) of whom had pathology follow‐up within 5 years. csPCa was detected in 76/240 (32%) and non‐csPCa in 109/240 (45%) within 9.0 ± 10.6 months. Using a non‐targeted trans‐rectal ultrasound biopsy as the initial approach (n = 55), another diagnostic procedure was required to diagnose csPCa in 42/55 (76.4%) of men, compared with 3/21(14.3%) men with an initial MR targeted‐biopsy approach (n = 21); (p < 0.0001). Those with csPCa had higher median serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density, and lower median prostate volume (p < 0.003) compared with non‐csPCa/no PCa. CONCLUSION: Most patients with PR‐3 AC underwent prostate pathology exams within 5 years, 32% of whom were found to have csPCa within 1 year of MRI, most often with a higher PSA density and a prior non‐csPCa diagnosis. Addition of a targeted biopsy approach initially reduced the need for a second biopsy to reach a for csPCa diagnosis. Thus, a combination of systematic and targeted biopsy is advised in men with PR‐3 and a co‐existing abnormal PSA and PSA density.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10268585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102685852023-06-16 PI‐RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection Camacho, Andrés Salah, Fatima Bay, Camden P. Waring, Jonathan Umeton, Renato Hirsch, Michelle S. Cole, Alexander P. Kibel, Adam S. Loda, Massimo Tempany, Clare M. Fennessy, Fiona M. BJUI Compass Original Articles RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The study aims to propose an optimal workflow in patients with a PI‐RADS 3 (PR‐3) assessment category (AC) through determining the timing and type of pathology interrogation used for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in these men based upon a 5‐year retrospective review in a large academic medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This United States Health Insurance Probability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)‐compliant, institutional review board‐approved retrospective study included men without prior csPCa diagnosis who received PR‐3 AC on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI). Subsequent incidence and time to csPCa diagnosis and number/type of prostate interventions was recorded. Categorical data were compared using Fisher's exact test and continuous data using ANOVA omnibus F‐test. RESULTS: Our cohort of 3238 men identified 332 who received PR‐3 as their highest AC on MRI, 240 (72.3%) of whom had pathology follow‐up within 5 years. csPCa was detected in 76/240 (32%) and non‐csPCa in 109/240 (45%) within 9.0 ± 10.6 months. Using a non‐targeted trans‐rectal ultrasound biopsy as the initial approach (n = 55), another diagnostic procedure was required to diagnose csPCa in 42/55 (76.4%) of men, compared with 3/21(14.3%) men with an initial MR targeted‐biopsy approach (n = 21); (p < 0.0001). Those with csPCa had higher median serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density, and lower median prostate volume (p < 0.003) compared with non‐csPCa/no PCa. CONCLUSION: Most patients with PR‐3 AC underwent prostate pathology exams within 5 years, 32% of whom were found to have csPCa within 1 year of MRI, most often with a higher PSA density and a prior non‐csPCa diagnosis. Addition of a targeted biopsy approach initially reduced the need for a second biopsy to reach a for csPCa diagnosis. Thus, a combination of systematic and targeted biopsy is advised in men with PR‐3 and a co‐existing abnormal PSA and PSA density. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10268585/ /pubmed/37334024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.231 Text en © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Camacho, Andrés
Salah, Fatima
Bay, Camden P.
Waring, Jonathan
Umeton, Renato
Hirsch, Michelle S.
Cole, Alexander P.
Kibel, Adam S.
Loda, Massimo
Tempany, Clare M.
Fennessy, Fiona M.
PI‐RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection
title PI‐RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection
title_full PI‐RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection
title_fullStr PI‐RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection
title_full_unstemmed PI‐RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection
title_short PI‐RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection
title_sort pi‐rads 3 score: a retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10268585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.231
work_keys_str_mv AT camachoandres pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT salahfatima pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT baycamdenp pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT waringjonathan pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT umetonrenato pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT hirschmichelles pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT colealexanderp pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT kibeladams pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT lodamassimo pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT tempanyclarem pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection
AT fennessyfionam pirads3scorearetrospectiveexperienceofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerdetection