Cargando…

Combining the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids

[Image: see text] For the computational prediction of core electron binding energies in solids, two distinct kinds of modeling strategies have been pursued: the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field method based on density functional theory (DFT), and the GW method. In this study, we examine the formal relationsh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahk, J. Matthias, Lischner, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37163299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00121
_version_ 1785059154758467584
author Kahk, J. Matthias
Lischner, Johannes
author_facet Kahk, J. Matthias
Lischner, Johannes
author_sort Kahk, J. Matthias
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] For the computational prediction of core electron binding energies in solids, two distinct kinds of modeling strategies have been pursued: the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field method based on density functional theory (DFT), and the GW method. In this study, we examine the formal relationship between these two approaches and establish a link between them. The link arises from the equivalence, in DFT, between the total energy difference result for the first ionization energy, and the eigenvalue of the highest occupied state, in the limit of infinite supercell size. This link allows us to introduce a new formalism, which highlights how in DFT—even if the total energy difference method is used to calculate core electron binding energies—the accuracy of the results still implicitly depends on the accuracy of the eigenvalue at the valence band maximum in insulators, or at the Fermi level in metals. We examine whether incorporating a quasiparticle correction for this eigenvalue from GW theory improves the accuracy of the calculated core electron binding energies, and find that the inclusion of vertex corrections is required for achieving quantitative agreement with experiment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10269324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102693242023-06-16 Combining the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids Kahk, J. Matthias Lischner, Johannes J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] For the computational prediction of core electron binding energies in solids, two distinct kinds of modeling strategies have been pursued: the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field method based on density functional theory (DFT), and the GW method. In this study, we examine the formal relationship between these two approaches and establish a link between them. The link arises from the equivalence, in DFT, between the total energy difference result for the first ionization energy, and the eigenvalue of the highest occupied state, in the limit of infinite supercell size. This link allows us to introduce a new formalism, which highlights how in DFT—even if the total energy difference method is used to calculate core electron binding energies—the accuracy of the results still implicitly depends on the accuracy of the eigenvalue at the valence band maximum in insulators, or at the Fermi level in metals. We examine whether incorporating a quasiparticle correction for this eigenvalue from GW theory improves the accuracy of the calculated core electron binding energies, and find that the inclusion of vertex corrections is required for achieving quantitative agreement with experiment. American Chemical Society 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10269324/ /pubmed/37163299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00121 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Kahk, J. Matthias
Lischner, Johannes
Combining the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids
title Combining the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids
title_full Combining the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids
title_fullStr Combining the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids
title_full_unstemmed Combining the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids
title_short Combining the Δ-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids
title_sort combining the δ-self-consistent-field and gw methods for predicting core electron binding energies in periodic solids
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37163299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00121
work_keys_str_mv AT kahkjmatthias combiningthedselfconsistentfieldandgwmethodsforpredictingcoreelectronbindingenergiesinperiodicsolids
AT lischnerjohannes combiningthedselfconsistentfieldandgwmethodsforpredictingcoreelectronbindingenergiesinperiodicsolids