Cargando…

A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen-Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) that detect antigen indicative of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can help in making quick health care decisions and regularly monitoring groups at risk of infection. With many RDT products entering the market, it is important to r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golden, Allison, Cantera, Jason L., Lillis, Lorraine, Phan, Thanh T., Slater, Hannah, Webb, Edwin J., Peck, Roger B., Boyle, David S., Domingo, Gonzalo J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37166329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03731-22
_version_ 1785059175256031232
author Golden, Allison
Cantera, Jason L.
Lillis, Lorraine
Phan, Thanh T.
Slater, Hannah
Webb, Edwin J.
Peck, Roger B.
Boyle, David S.
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
author_facet Golden, Allison
Cantera, Jason L.
Lillis, Lorraine
Phan, Thanh T.
Slater, Hannah
Webb, Edwin J.
Peck, Roger B.
Boyle, David S.
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
author_sort Golden, Allison
collection PubMed
description Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) that detect antigen indicative of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can help in making quick health care decisions and regularly monitoring groups at risk of infection. With many RDT products entering the market, it is important to rapidly evaluate their relative performance. Comparison of clinical evaluation study results is challenged by protocol design variations and study populations. Laboratory assays were developed to quantify nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Quantification of the two antigens in nasal eluates confirmed higher abundance of N than S antigen. The median concentration of N antigen was 10 times greater than S per genome equivalent. The N antigen assay was used in combination with quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR to qualify a panel composed of recombinant antigens, inactivated virus, and clinical specimen pools. This benchmarking panel was applied to evaluate the analytical performance of the SD Biosensor Standard Q COVID-19 antigen (Ag) test, Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test, Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag test, and the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test. The four tests displayed different sensitivities toward the different panel members, but all performed best with the clinical specimen pool. The concentration for a 90% probability of detection across the four tests ranged from 21 to 102 pg/mL of N antigen in the extracted sample. Benchmarking panels provide a quick way to verify the baseline performance of a diagnostic and enable direct comparisons between diagnostic tests. IMPORTANCE This study reports the results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) antigen quantification assays and their performance against clinical reverse transcription (RT)-PCR results, thus describing an open-access quantification method for two important SARS-CoV-2 protein analytes. Characterized N antigen panels were used to evaluate the limits of detection of four different rapid tests for SARS-CoV-2 against multiple sources of nucleocapsid antigen, demonstrating proof-of-concept materials and methodology to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests. Quantification of N antigen was used to characterize the relationship between viral count and antigen concentration among clinical samples and panel members of both clinical sample and viral culture origin. This contributes to a deeper understanding of protein antigen and molecular analytes and presents analytical methods complementary to clinical evaluation for characterizing the performance of both laboratory-based and point-of-care rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10269465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102694652023-06-16 A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen-Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 Golden, Allison Cantera, Jason L. Lillis, Lorraine Phan, Thanh T. Slater, Hannah Webb, Edwin J. Peck, Roger B. Boyle, David S. Domingo, Gonzalo J. Microbiol Spectr Research Article Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) that detect antigen indicative of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can help in making quick health care decisions and regularly monitoring groups at risk of infection. With many RDT products entering the market, it is important to rapidly evaluate their relative performance. Comparison of clinical evaluation study results is challenged by protocol design variations and study populations. Laboratory assays were developed to quantify nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Quantification of the two antigens in nasal eluates confirmed higher abundance of N than S antigen. The median concentration of N antigen was 10 times greater than S per genome equivalent. The N antigen assay was used in combination with quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR to qualify a panel composed of recombinant antigens, inactivated virus, and clinical specimen pools. This benchmarking panel was applied to evaluate the analytical performance of the SD Biosensor Standard Q COVID-19 antigen (Ag) test, Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test, Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag test, and the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag test. The four tests displayed different sensitivities toward the different panel members, but all performed best with the clinical specimen pool. The concentration for a 90% probability of detection across the four tests ranged from 21 to 102 pg/mL of N antigen in the extracted sample. Benchmarking panels provide a quick way to verify the baseline performance of a diagnostic and enable direct comparisons between diagnostic tests. IMPORTANCE This study reports the results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) antigen quantification assays and their performance against clinical reverse transcription (RT)-PCR results, thus describing an open-access quantification method for two important SARS-CoV-2 protein analytes. Characterized N antigen panels were used to evaluate the limits of detection of four different rapid tests for SARS-CoV-2 against multiple sources of nucleocapsid antigen, demonstrating proof-of-concept materials and methodology to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests. Quantification of N antigen was used to characterize the relationship between viral count and antigen concentration among clinical samples and panel members of both clinical sample and viral culture origin. This contributes to a deeper understanding of protein antigen and molecular analytes and presents analytical methods complementary to clinical evaluation for characterizing the performance of both laboratory-based and point-of-care rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2. American Society for Microbiology 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10269465/ /pubmed/37166329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03731-22 Text en Copyright © 2023 Golden et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Golden, Allison
Cantera, Jason L.
Lillis, Lorraine
Phan, Thanh T.
Slater, Hannah
Webb, Edwin J.
Peck, Roger B.
Boyle, David S.
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen-Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19
title A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen-Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19
title_full A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen-Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19
title_fullStr A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen-Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen-Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19
title_short A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen-Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19
title_sort reagent and virus benchmarking panel for a uniform analytical performance assessment of n antigen-based diagnostic tests for covid-19
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37166329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03731-22
work_keys_str_mv AT goldenallison areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT canterajasonl areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT lillislorraine areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT phanthanht areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT slaterhannah areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT webbedwinj areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT peckrogerb areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT boyledavids areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT domingogonzaloj areagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT goldenallison reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT canterajasonl reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT lillislorraine reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT phanthanht reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT slaterhannah reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT webbedwinj reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT peckrogerb reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT boyledavids reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19
AT domingogonzaloj reagentandvirusbenchmarkingpanelforauniformanalyticalperformanceassessmentofnantigenbaseddiagnostictestsforcovid19