Cargando…

In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019

Aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis are three novel antimicrobial agents for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the above-mentioned three antimicrobial agents against clinical Enterobacterales isolates. A total o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jiawei, Liu, Yong, Jia, Wei, Xu, Xuesong, Sun, Guizhen, Wang, Tong, Li, Jin, Zhang, Ge, Jing, Ran, Sun, Hongli, Xu, Yingchun, Liu, Yali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37184411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04873-22
_version_ 1785059198378180608
author Chen, Jiawei
Liu, Yong
Jia, Wei
Xu, Xuesong
Sun, Guizhen
Wang, Tong
Li, Jin
Zhang, Ge
Jing, Ran
Sun, Hongli
Xu, Yingchun
Liu, Yali
author_facet Chen, Jiawei
Liu, Yong
Jia, Wei
Xu, Xuesong
Sun, Guizhen
Wang, Tong
Li, Jin
Zhang, Ge
Jing, Ran
Sun, Hongli
Xu, Yingchun
Liu, Yali
author_sort Chen, Jiawei
collection PubMed
description Aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis are three novel antimicrobial agents for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the above-mentioned three antimicrobial agents against clinical Enterobacterales isolates. A total of 1,202 Enterobacterales isolates, including 10 genera or species, were collected from 26 hospitals that cover seven regions of China. The susceptibilities of the 30 antimicrobial agents were interpreted based on the combination of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The results indicated that all Enterobacterales isolates showed high susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam (98.25%), eravacycline (85.69%), and cefoselis (62.73%). The first two antimicrobial agents also demonstrated potent activities against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales independent of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. The rates of susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis were lowest in Morganella spp. (84.42%), Proteus spp. (33.65%), and Escherichia coli (40.14%), respectively. In general, the lower rates of susceptibility to eravacycline and cefoselis were in the older inpatient group. The strains isolated from urinary tract exhibited the lowest rate of susceptibility (78.97%) to eravacycline, and the lowest rate of susceptibility (45.83%) to cefoselis was observed in nervous system specimens. The strains isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) wards showed significantly reduced susceptibility to cefoselis compared with those isolated from non-ICU wards. The MIC values of aztreonam-avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam have poor consistency (weighted kappa = 0.243), as did eravacycline and tigecycline (weighted kappa = 0.478). Cefoselis and cefepime showed highly similar activities against Enterobacterales (weighted kappa = 0.801). Our results support the clinical development of aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales. IMPORTANCE Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales, especially carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), have been a challenging clinical problem due to the limited therapeutic options. Therefore, the need to develop novel antimicrobial agents and evaluate their activities against Enterobacterales in vitro is urgent. Our results show that the novel antimicrobial agents aztreonam-avibactam and eravacycline retain activities against MDR and CRE isolates, including carbapenemase producers and non-carbapenemase producers. Further analysis combined with clinical information on the strains tested revealed that no significant differences were observed in susceptibility rates of strains with different demographic parameters to aztreonam-avibactam. Age, specimen source, and department were associated with the susceptibility of strains to eravacycline and cefoselis (P ≤ 0.01). Compared with ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam has its advantages and limitations against Enterobacterales. The potent activity of eravacycline against Enterobacterales was higher than that of tigecycline. Cefoselis and cefepime showed a highly consistent activity against Enterobacterales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10269566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102695662023-06-16 In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019 Chen, Jiawei Liu, Yong Jia, Wei Xu, Xuesong Sun, Guizhen Wang, Tong Li, Jin Zhang, Ge Jing, Ran Sun, Hongli Xu, Yingchun Liu, Yali Microbiol Spectr Research Article Aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis are three novel antimicrobial agents for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the above-mentioned three antimicrobial agents against clinical Enterobacterales isolates. A total of 1,202 Enterobacterales isolates, including 10 genera or species, were collected from 26 hospitals that cover seven regions of China. The susceptibilities of the 30 antimicrobial agents were interpreted based on the combination of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The results indicated that all Enterobacterales isolates showed high susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam (98.25%), eravacycline (85.69%), and cefoselis (62.73%). The first two antimicrobial agents also demonstrated potent activities against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales independent of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. The rates of susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis were lowest in Morganella spp. (84.42%), Proteus spp. (33.65%), and Escherichia coli (40.14%), respectively. In general, the lower rates of susceptibility to eravacycline and cefoselis were in the older inpatient group. The strains isolated from urinary tract exhibited the lowest rate of susceptibility (78.97%) to eravacycline, and the lowest rate of susceptibility (45.83%) to cefoselis was observed in nervous system specimens. The strains isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) wards showed significantly reduced susceptibility to cefoselis compared with those isolated from non-ICU wards. The MIC values of aztreonam-avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam have poor consistency (weighted kappa = 0.243), as did eravacycline and tigecycline (weighted kappa = 0.478). Cefoselis and cefepime showed highly similar activities against Enterobacterales (weighted kappa = 0.801). Our results support the clinical development of aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales. IMPORTANCE Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales, especially carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), have been a challenging clinical problem due to the limited therapeutic options. Therefore, the need to develop novel antimicrobial agents and evaluate their activities against Enterobacterales in vitro is urgent. Our results show that the novel antimicrobial agents aztreonam-avibactam and eravacycline retain activities against MDR and CRE isolates, including carbapenemase producers and non-carbapenemase producers. Further analysis combined with clinical information on the strains tested revealed that no significant differences were observed in susceptibility rates of strains with different demographic parameters to aztreonam-avibactam. Age, specimen source, and department were associated with the susceptibility of strains to eravacycline and cefoselis (P ≤ 0.01). Compared with ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam has its advantages and limitations against Enterobacterales. The potent activity of eravacycline against Enterobacterales was higher than that of tigecycline. Cefoselis and cefepime showed a highly consistent activity against Enterobacterales. American Society for Microbiology 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10269566/ /pubmed/37184411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04873-22 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Jiawei
Liu, Yong
Jia, Wei
Xu, Xuesong
Sun, Guizhen
Wang, Tong
Li, Jin
Zhang, Ge
Jing, Ran
Sun, Hongli
Xu, Yingchun
Liu, Yali
In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019
title In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019
title_full In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019
title_fullStr In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019
title_short In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019
title_sort in vitro activities of aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, cefoselis, and other comparators against clinical enterobacterales isolates: a multicenter study in china, 2019
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37184411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04873-22
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjiawei invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT liuyong invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT jiawei invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT xuxuesong invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT sunguizhen invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT wangtong invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT lijin invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT zhangge invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT jingran invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT sunhongli invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT xuyingchun invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019
AT liuyali invitroactivitiesofaztreonamavibactameravacyclinecefoselisandothercomparatorsagainstclinicalenterobacteralesisolatesamulticenterstudyinchina2019