Cargando…

Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Yu, Huang, Yun-Ting, Chi, Kuan-Yu, Huang, Yen-Ta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334113
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15495
_version_ 1785059198844796928
author Chang, Yu
Huang, Yun-Ting
Chi, Kuan-Yu
Huang, Yen-Ta
author_facet Chang, Yu
Huang, Yun-Ting
Chi, Kuan-Yu
Huang, Yen-Ta
author_sort Chang, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam is a new short-acting GABA-A receptor agonist. It is an ester-based benzodiazepine. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for procedure sedation. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy or safety of remimazolam versus propofol. Meta-analysis were conducted using RStudio with “metafor” package with random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of twelve RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with remimazolam for procedural sedation had lower risk of bradycardia (OR 0.28, 95% CI [0.14–0.57]), hypotension (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.22–0.32]), and respiratory depression (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.14–0.36]). There was no difference in the risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.15–2.79]) and dizziness (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.53–1.61]) between the remimazolam and propofol groups. Using remimazolam for procedural sedation is significantly associated with less injection pain compared to propofol (OR 0.06, 95% CI [0.03–0.13]). Regarding the sedation efficacy, there was no difference in sedation success rate or time to loss of consciousness, recover and discharge between the remimazolam and the propofol groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our meta-analysis, patients receiving procedural sedation with remimazolam had lower risk of bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression and injection pain compared with propofol. On the other hand, there was no difference in sedation success rate, risk of PONV, dizziness, time to LOC, recovery and discharge between these two sedatives. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022362950
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10269568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102695682023-06-16 Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Chang, Yu Huang, Yun-Ting Chi, Kuan-Yu Huang, Yen-Ta PeerJ Anesthesiology and Pain Management BACKGROUND: To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam is a new short-acting GABA-A receptor agonist. It is an ester-based benzodiazepine. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for procedure sedation. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy or safety of remimazolam versus propofol. Meta-analysis were conducted using RStudio with “metafor” package with random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of twelve RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with remimazolam for procedural sedation had lower risk of bradycardia (OR 0.28, 95% CI [0.14–0.57]), hypotension (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.22–0.32]), and respiratory depression (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.14–0.36]). There was no difference in the risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.15–2.79]) and dizziness (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.53–1.61]) between the remimazolam and propofol groups. Using remimazolam for procedural sedation is significantly associated with less injection pain compared to propofol (OR 0.06, 95% CI [0.03–0.13]). Regarding the sedation efficacy, there was no difference in sedation success rate or time to loss of consciousness, recover and discharge between the remimazolam and the propofol groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our meta-analysis, patients receiving procedural sedation with remimazolam had lower risk of bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression and injection pain compared with propofol. On the other hand, there was no difference in sedation success rate, risk of PONV, dizziness, time to LOC, recovery and discharge between these two sedatives. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022362950 PeerJ Inc. 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10269568/ /pubmed/37334113 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15495 Text en ©2023 Chang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology and Pain Management
Chang, Yu
Huang, Yun-Ting
Chi, Kuan-Yu
Huang, Yen-Ta
Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Anesthesiology and Pain Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334113
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15495
work_keys_str_mv AT changyu remimazolamversuspropofolforproceduralsedationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangyunting remimazolamversuspropofolforproceduralsedationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chikuanyu remimazolamversuspropofolforproceduralsedationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangyenta remimazolamversuspropofolforproceduralsedationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials