Cargando…

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease with Streptomycin or Amikacin Use

The comparative outcomes of specific aminoglycosides in cavitary type (fibrocavitary or cavitary nodular bronchiectatic type) Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease (PD) are unelucidated. We investigated the treatment outcomes with streptomycin or amikacin inclusion in the treatment reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seong Min, Chong, Yong Pil, Lee, Hyun Joo, Shim, Tae Sun, Jo, Kyung-Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37022189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04741-22
_version_ 1785059218131255296
author Kim, Seong Min
Chong, Yong Pil
Lee, Hyun Joo
Shim, Tae Sun
Jo, Kyung-Wook
author_facet Kim, Seong Min
Chong, Yong Pil
Lee, Hyun Joo
Shim, Tae Sun
Jo, Kyung-Wook
author_sort Kim, Seong Min
collection PubMed
description The comparative outcomes of specific aminoglycosides in cavitary type (fibrocavitary or cavitary nodular bronchiectatic type) Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease (PD) are unelucidated. We investigated the treatment outcomes with streptomycin or amikacin inclusion in the treatment regimen. From 2006 to 2020, 168 patients with cavitary MAC-PD who received guideline-based therapy (a three-drug oral antibiotic regimen with macrolide, ethambutol, and rifampin with an injectable aminoglycoside) for ≥1 year at a tertiary referral center in South Korea were retrospectively enrolled. We compared the rates of the culture conversion achievement of patients with streptomycin or amikacin use. Of the 168 participants, 127 patients (75.6%) received streptomycin and 41 (24.4%) received amikacin (median [interquartile range] treatment duration of 17.6 [14.2 to 25.2] and 17.0 [14.0 to 19.4] weeks, respectively). The overall culture conversion rate at treatment completion was 75.6% (127/168), and the rates were similar for the streptomycin-treated and amikacin-treated groups (74.8% [95/127] and 78.0% [32/41], respectively; P = 0.674). A multivariate analysis revealed that the achievement of culture conversion did not differ significantly with streptomycin or amikacin use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.086; 95% confidence interval, 0.425 to 2.777). The rate of adverse events was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, in cavitary MAC-PD, treatment with streptomycin-containing and amikacin-containing regimens results in similar rates of culture conversion achievement. IMPORTANCE We found that among the participants with cavitary MAC-PD who received guideline-based treatment for ≥1 year, the selection of either streptomycin or amikacin in the treatment regimen led to similar rates of culture conversion at treatment completion. In addition, the adverse reaction development rate did not differ significantly for streptomycin and amikacin. These findings suggest that either streptomycin or amikacin can be selected for the treatment of MAC-PD, according to the physician’s or patient’s preference, such as the route of administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10269653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102696532023-06-16 Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease with Streptomycin or Amikacin Use Kim, Seong Min Chong, Yong Pil Lee, Hyun Joo Shim, Tae Sun Jo, Kyung-Wook Microbiol Spectr Research Article The comparative outcomes of specific aminoglycosides in cavitary type (fibrocavitary or cavitary nodular bronchiectatic type) Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease (PD) are unelucidated. We investigated the treatment outcomes with streptomycin or amikacin inclusion in the treatment regimen. From 2006 to 2020, 168 patients with cavitary MAC-PD who received guideline-based therapy (a three-drug oral antibiotic regimen with macrolide, ethambutol, and rifampin with an injectable aminoglycoside) for ≥1 year at a tertiary referral center in South Korea were retrospectively enrolled. We compared the rates of the culture conversion achievement of patients with streptomycin or amikacin use. Of the 168 participants, 127 patients (75.6%) received streptomycin and 41 (24.4%) received amikacin (median [interquartile range] treatment duration of 17.6 [14.2 to 25.2] and 17.0 [14.0 to 19.4] weeks, respectively). The overall culture conversion rate at treatment completion was 75.6% (127/168), and the rates were similar for the streptomycin-treated and amikacin-treated groups (74.8% [95/127] and 78.0% [32/41], respectively; P = 0.674). A multivariate analysis revealed that the achievement of culture conversion did not differ significantly with streptomycin or amikacin use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.086; 95% confidence interval, 0.425 to 2.777). The rate of adverse events was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, in cavitary MAC-PD, treatment with streptomycin-containing and amikacin-containing regimens results in similar rates of culture conversion achievement. IMPORTANCE We found that among the participants with cavitary MAC-PD who received guideline-based treatment for ≥1 year, the selection of either streptomycin or amikacin in the treatment regimen led to similar rates of culture conversion at treatment completion. In addition, the adverse reaction development rate did not differ significantly for streptomycin and amikacin. These findings suggest that either streptomycin or amikacin can be selected for the treatment of MAC-PD, according to the physician’s or patient’s preference, such as the route of administration. American Society for Microbiology 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10269653/ /pubmed/37022189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04741-22 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Seong Min
Chong, Yong Pil
Lee, Hyun Joo
Shim, Tae Sun
Jo, Kyung-Wook
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease with Streptomycin or Amikacin Use
title Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease with Streptomycin or Amikacin Use
title_full Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease with Streptomycin or Amikacin Use
title_fullStr Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease with Streptomycin or Amikacin Use
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease with Streptomycin or Amikacin Use
title_short Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Cavitary Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease with Streptomycin or Amikacin Use
title_sort comparison of treatment outcomes of cavitary mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease with streptomycin or amikacin use
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37022189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04741-22
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseongmin comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesofcavitarymycobacteriumaviumcomplexpulmonarydiseasewithstreptomycinoramikacinuse
AT chongyongpil comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesofcavitarymycobacteriumaviumcomplexpulmonarydiseasewithstreptomycinoramikacinuse
AT leehyunjoo comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesofcavitarymycobacteriumaviumcomplexpulmonarydiseasewithstreptomycinoramikacinuse
AT shimtaesun comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesofcavitarymycobacteriumaviumcomplexpulmonarydiseasewithstreptomycinoramikacinuse
AT jokyungwook comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesofcavitarymycobacteriumaviumcomplexpulmonarydiseasewithstreptomycinoramikacinuse