Cargando…
Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37199669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00932-23 |
_version_ | 1785059239910178816 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Leilei Zhang, Xuefei Zhou, Xun Yang, Fan Guo, Qinglan Wang, Minggui |
author_facet | Wang, Leilei Zhang, Xuefei Zhou, Xun Yang, Fan Guo, Qinglan Wang, Minggui |
author_sort | Wang, Leilei |
collection | PubMed |
description | The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, determined how avibactam restored ceftazidime activity, and compared the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) against KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Similar high susceptibility rates for CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam (88.9% to 89.8%) were found for 596 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from 11 hospitals in China, and a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime than imipenem was observed (73.5% versus 63.1%). For CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates, susceptibility rates for CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR were 61.5% (75/122), 54.9% (67/122), and 51.6% (63/122), respectively. For CAZ-NS, IPM-NS but CZA-susceptible isolates, 34.7% (26/75) harbored acquired β-lactamases with KPC-2 predominant (n = 19), and 45.3% (34/75) presented overexpression of chromosomal β-lactamase ampC. Among 22 isolates carrying KPC-2 carbapenemase alone, susceptibility rates to CZA and IMR were 86.4% (19/22) and 9.1% (2/22), respectively. Notably, 95% (19/20) of IMR-nonsusceptible isolates had an inactivating mutation of oprD gene. In conclusion, CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR exhibit high activity against P. aeruginosa, and CZA is more active than IMR against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates as well as KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Avibactam overcomes ceftazidime resistance engendered by KPC-2 enzyme and overexpressed AmpC. IMPORTANCE The emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses a particular challenge globally, and the concept of P. aeruginosa with “difficult-to-treat” resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was proposed. Here, P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were highly susceptible to three β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The combination of KPC-2 enzyme and nonfunctional porin OprD contributed to IMR resistance in P. aeruginosa, and CZA was more active than IMR in fighting against KPC-2-producing P. aeruginosa. CZA also showed good activity against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS P. aeruginosa, primarily by inhibiting KPC-2 enzyme and overproduced AmpC, supporting the clinical use of CZA in the treatment of infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10269746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102697462023-06-16 Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Wang, Leilei Zhang, Xuefei Zhou, Xun Yang, Fan Guo, Qinglan Wang, Minggui Microbiol Spectr Research Article The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, determined how avibactam restored ceftazidime activity, and compared the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) against KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Similar high susceptibility rates for CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam (88.9% to 89.8%) were found for 596 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from 11 hospitals in China, and a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime than imipenem was observed (73.5% versus 63.1%). For CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates, susceptibility rates for CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR were 61.5% (75/122), 54.9% (67/122), and 51.6% (63/122), respectively. For CAZ-NS, IPM-NS but CZA-susceptible isolates, 34.7% (26/75) harbored acquired β-lactamases with KPC-2 predominant (n = 19), and 45.3% (34/75) presented overexpression of chromosomal β-lactamase ampC. Among 22 isolates carrying KPC-2 carbapenemase alone, susceptibility rates to CZA and IMR were 86.4% (19/22) and 9.1% (2/22), respectively. Notably, 95% (19/20) of IMR-nonsusceptible isolates had an inactivating mutation of oprD gene. In conclusion, CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR exhibit high activity against P. aeruginosa, and CZA is more active than IMR against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates as well as KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Avibactam overcomes ceftazidime resistance engendered by KPC-2 enzyme and overexpressed AmpC. IMPORTANCE The emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses a particular challenge globally, and the concept of P. aeruginosa with “difficult-to-treat” resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was proposed. Here, P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were highly susceptible to three β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The combination of KPC-2 enzyme and nonfunctional porin OprD contributed to IMR resistance in P. aeruginosa, and CZA was more active than IMR in fighting against KPC-2-producing P. aeruginosa. CZA also showed good activity against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS P. aeruginosa, primarily by inhibiting KPC-2 enzyme and overproduced AmpC, supporting the clinical use of CZA in the treatment of infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa. American Society for Microbiology 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10269746/ /pubmed/37199669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00932-23 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Leilei Zhang, Xuefei Zhou, Xun Yang, Fan Guo, Qinglan Wang, Minggui Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title | Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_full | Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_fullStr | Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_short | Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_sort | comparison of in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam against clinical isolates of pseudomonas aeruginosa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37199669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00932-23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangleilei comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa AT zhangxuefei comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa AT zhouxun comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa AT yangfan comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa AT guoqinglan comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa AT wangminggui comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa |