Cargando…

Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Leilei, Zhang, Xuefei, Zhou, Xun, Yang, Fan, Guo, Qinglan, Wang, Minggui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37199669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00932-23
_version_ 1785059239910178816
author Wang, Leilei
Zhang, Xuefei
Zhou, Xun
Yang, Fan
Guo, Qinglan
Wang, Minggui
author_facet Wang, Leilei
Zhang, Xuefei
Zhou, Xun
Yang, Fan
Guo, Qinglan
Wang, Minggui
author_sort Wang, Leilei
collection PubMed
description The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, determined how avibactam restored ceftazidime activity, and compared the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) against KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Similar high susceptibility rates for CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam (88.9% to 89.8%) were found for 596 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from 11 hospitals in China, and a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime than imipenem was observed (73.5% versus 63.1%). For CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates, susceptibility rates for CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR were 61.5% (75/122), 54.9% (67/122), and 51.6% (63/122), respectively. For CAZ-NS, IPM-NS but CZA-susceptible isolates, 34.7% (26/75) harbored acquired β-lactamases with KPC-2 predominant (n = 19), and 45.3% (34/75) presented overexpression of chromosomal β-lactamase ampC. Among 22 isolates carrying KPC-2 carbapenemase alone, susceptibility rates to CZA and IMR were 86.4% (19/22) and 9.1% (2/22), respectively. Notably, 95% (19/20) of IMR-nonsusceptible isolates had an inactivating mutation of oprD gene. In conclusion, CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR exhibit high activity against P. aeruginosa, and CZA is more active than IMR against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates as well as KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Avibactam overcomes ceftazidime resistance engendered by KPC-2 enzyme and overexpressed AmpC. IMPORTANCE The emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses a particular challenge globally, and the concept of P. aeruginosa with “difficult-to-treat” resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was proposed. Here, P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were highly susceptible to three β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The combination of KPC-2 enzyme and nonfunctional porin OprD contributed to IMR resistance in P. aeruginosa, and CZA was more active than IMR in fighting against KPC-2-producing P. aeruginosa. CZA also showed good activity against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS P. aeruginosa, primarily by inhibiting KPC-2 enzyme and overproduced AmpC, supporting the clinical use of CZA in the treatment of infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10269746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102697462023-06-16 Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Wang, Leilei Zhang, Xuefei Zhou, Xun Yang, Fan Guo, Qinglan Wang, Minggui Microbiol Spectr Research Article The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, determined how avibactam restored ceftazidime activity, and compared the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) against KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Similar high susceptibility rates for CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam (88.9% to 89.8%) were found for 596 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from 11 hospitals in China, and a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime than imipenem was observed (73.5% versus 63.1%). For CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates, susceptibility rates for CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR were 61.5% (75/122), 54.9% (67/122), and 51.6% (63/122), respectively. For CAZ-NS, IPM-NS but CZA-susceptible isolates, 34.7% (26/75) harbored acquired β-lactamases with KPC-2 predominant (n = 19), and 45.3% (34/75) presented overexpression of chromosomal β-lactamase ampC. Among 22 isolates carrying KPC-2 carbapenemase alone, susceptibility rates to CZA and IMR were 86.4% (19/22) and 9.1% (2/22), respectively. Notably, 95% (19/20) of IMR-nonsusceptible isolates had an inactivating mutation of oprD gene. In conclusion, CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR exhibit high activity against P. aeruginosa, and CZA is more active than IMR against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates as well as KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Avibactam overcomes ceftazidime resistance engendered by KPC-2 enzyme and overexpressed AmpC. IMPORTANCE The emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses a particular challenge globally, and the concept of P. aeruginosa with “difficult-to-treat” resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was proposed. Here, P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were highly susceptible to three β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The combination of KPC-2 enzyme and nonfunctional porin OprD contributed to IMR resistance in P. aeruginosa, and CZA was more active than IMR in fighting against KPC-2-producing P. aeruginosa. CZA also showed good activity against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS P. aeruginosa, primarily by inhibiting KPC-2 enzyme and overproduced AmpC, supporting the clinical use of CZA in the treatment of infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa. American Society for Microbiology 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10269746/ /pubmed/37199669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00932-23 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Leilei
Zhang, Xuefei
Zhou, Xun
Yang, Fan
Guo, Qinglan
Wang, Minggui
Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_fullStr Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_short Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_sort comparison of in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam against clinical isolates of pseudomonas aeruginosa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37199669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00932-23
work_keys_str_mv AT wangleilei comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT zhangxuefei comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT zhouxun comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT yangfan comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT guoqinglan comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT wangminggui comparisonofinvitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamandimipenemrelebactamagainstclinicalisolatesofpseudomonasaeruginosa