Cargando…

Association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the association of employees working in various kinds of open-plan offices with sick leave data, compared to those working in traditional cell offices. Databases of PubMed, PubPsych, and Psyndex were systematically searched following the PRISMA stat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MAUSS, Daniel, JARCZOK, Marc N., GENSER, Bernd, HERR, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35675991
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2022-0053
_version_ 1785059259832074240
author MAUSS, Daniel
JARCZOK, Marc N.
GENSER, Bernd
HERR, Raphael
author_facet MAUSS, Daniel
JARCZOK, Marc N.
GENSER, Bernd
HERR, Raphael
author_sort MAUSS, Daniel
collection PubMed
description We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the association of employees working in various kinds of open-plan offices with sick leave data, compared to those working in traditional cell offices. Databases of PubMed, PubPsych, and Psyndex were systematically searched following the PRISMA statement. Pooled summary estimates of odds ratio (OR) were calculated comparing sick leave of employees in cell offices with those working in small open-plan offices (4–9 people), and those in various open-plan office solutions (≥4 people). We used Forest plots visualizing study-specific estimates and the pooled fixed and random effects estimators. Five studies were identified (2008–2020) with a total of 13,277 (range 469–6,328) participants. Compared with employees working in cell offices, those working in small open-plan offices were associated with higher odds of sick leave days (OR=1.27; 95% CI 0.99–1.54; p=0.046) as well as those working in various kinds of open-plan offices with ≥4 colleagues (OR=1.24; 95% CI 0.96–1.51; p=0.004). Our results are consistent with those of earlier reviews focusing on other effects of open-plan office solutions such as health and well-being. Different solutions for office design and architectural lay-out should be the focus of future studies to balance pros and cons of open-plan offices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10269830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102698302023-06-16 Association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis MAUSS, Daniel JARCZOK, Marc N. GENSER, Bernd HERR, Raphael Ind Health Review Article We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the association of employees working in various kinds of open-plan offices with sick leave data, compared to those working in traditional cell offices. Databases of PubMed, PubPsych, and Psyndex were systematically searched following the PRISMA statement. Pooled summary estimates of odds ratio (OR) were calculated comparing sick leave of employees in cell offices with those working in small open-plan offices (4–9 people), and those in various open-plan office solutions (≥4 people). We used Forest plots visualizing study-specific estimates and the pooled fixed and random effects estimators. Five studies were identified (2008–2020) with a total of 13,277 (range 469–6,328) participants. Compared with employees working in cell offices, those working in small open-plan offices were associated with higher odds of sick leave days (OR=1.27; 95% CI 0.99–1.54; p=0.046) as well as those working in various kinds of open-plan offices with ≥4 colleagues (OR=1.24; 95% CI 0.96–1.51; p=0.004). Our results are consistent with those of earlier reviews focusing on other effects of open-plan office solutions such as health and well-being. Different solutions for office design and architectural lay-out should be the focus of future studies to balance pros and cons of open-plan offices. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2022-06-09 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10269830/ /pubmed/35675991 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2022-0053 Text en ©2023 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review Article
MAUSS, Daniel
JARCZOK, Marc N.
GENSER, Bernd
HERR, Raphael
Association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort association of open-plan offices and sick leave—a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35675991
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2022-0053
work_keys_str_mv AT maussdaniel associationofopenplanofficesandsickleaveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jarczokmarcn associationofopenplanofficesandsickleaveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT genserbernd associationofopenplanofficesandsickleaveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT herrraphael associationofopenplanofficesandsickleaveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis