Cargando…

Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are a boon to paediatric airway management. The clinical performances of the BlockBuster® laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and Ambu® AuraGain™ in preschool children were compared in this study. METHODS: After ethical approval and trial registration,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaur, Yashshwani, Jaju, Rishabh, Paliwal, Naveen, Choudhary, Usha, Bihani, Pooja, Janweja, Sarita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333705
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_286_22
_version_ 1785059286989144064
author Gaur, Yashshwani
Jaju, Rishabh
Paliwal, Naveen
Choudhary, Usha
Bihani, Pooja
Janweja, Sarita
author_facet Gaur, Yashshwani
Jaju, Rishabh
Paliwal, Naveen
Choudhary, Usha
Bihani, Pooja
Janweja, Sarita
author_sort Gaur, Yashshwani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are a boon to paediatric airway management. The clinical performances of the BlockBuster® laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and Ambu® AuraGain™ in preschool children were compared in this study. METHODS: After ethical approval and trial registration, this randomised controlled study was conducted on 50 children, aged 1–4 years, randomised into two groups. Appropriate sized Ambu® AuraGain™ (group A) and LMA BlockBuster® (group B) were placed as per the manufacturer’s recommendation under general anaesthesia. Appropriate size of the endotracheal tube was then chosen and inserted through the device. Primary objective of the study was to compare the oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), and secondary objectives were the first attempt intubation success rate, overall intubation success rate, SGA insertion time, intubation time, haemodynamic changes and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications. The Chi-square test was used to analyse the categorical variables, while the intragroup comparison of mean changes in outcomes was evaluated by the unpaired t-test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Demographic parameters were uniformly distributed in both the groups. The mean OSP in group A was 26.6 ± 0.95 cm H(2)O and in group B was 29.08 ± 0.75 cm H(2)O. Both the devices were successfully inserted in all the patients. The success rate of blind endotracheal intubation through the device in first attempt was 4% in group A and 80% in group B. Postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications were relatively less in group B. CONCLUSION: LMA BlockBuster® provides higher OSP and provides a higher success rate of blind endotracheal intubation in paediatric patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10269989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102699892023-06-16 Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial Gaur, Yashshwani Jaju, Rishabh Paliwal, Naveen Choudhary, Usha Bihani, Pooja Janweja, Sarita Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are a boon to paediatric airway management. The clinical performances of the BlockBuster® laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and Ambu® AuraGain™ in preschool children were compared in this study. METHODS: After ethical approval and trial registration, this randomised controlled study was conducted on 50 children, aged 1–4 years, randomised into two groups. Appropriate sized Ambu® AuraGain™ (group A) and LMA BlockBuster® (group B) were placed as per the manufacturer’s recommendation under general anaesthesia. Appropriate size of the endotracheal tube was then chosen and inserted through the device. Primary objective of the study was to compare the oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), and secondary objectives were the first attempt intubation success rate, overall intubation success rate, SGA insertion time, intubation time, haemodynamic changes and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications. The Chi-square test was used to analyse the categorical variables, while the intragroup comparison of mean changes in outcomes was evaluated by the unpaired t-test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Demographic parameters were uniformly distributed in both the groups. The mean OSP in group A was 26.6 ± 0.95 cm H(2)O and in group B was 29.08 ± 0.75 cm H(2)O. Both the devices were successfully inserted in all the patients. The success rate of blind endotracheal intubation through the device in first attempt was 4% in group A and 80% in group B. Postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications were relatively less in group B. CONCLUSION: LMA BlockBuster® provides higher OSP and provides a higher success rate of blind endotracheal intubation in paediatric patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2023-05 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10269989/ /pubmed/37333705 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_286_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gaur, Yashshwani
Jaju, Rishabh
Paliwal, Naveen
Choudhary, Usha
Bihani, Pooja
Janweja, Sarita
Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial
title Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparison of clinical performance of ambu® auragain™ and blockbuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333705
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_286_22
work_keys_str_mv AT gauryashshwani comparisonofclinicalperformanceofambuauragainandblockbusterinanaesthetisedpreschoolchildrenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jajurishabh comparisonofclinicalperformanceofambuauragainandblockbusterinanaesthetisedpreschoolchildrenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT paliwalnaveen comparisonofclinicalperformanceofambuauragainandblockbusterinanaesthetisedpreschoolchildrenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT choudharyusha comparisonofclinicalperformanceofambuauragainandblockbusterinanaesthetisedpreschoolchildrenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bihanipooja comparisonofclinicalperformanceofambuauragainandblockbusterinanaesthetisedpreschoolchildrenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janwejasarita comparisonofclinicalperformanceofambuauragainandblockbusterinanaesthetisedpreschoolchildrenarandomisedcontrolledtrial