Cargando…

Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial

BACKGROUND: The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is still under debate. Studies up to date have shown a positive effect with an improvement in quality of life. However, no double blinded randomized controlled trials have been performed. HYPOTHESI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vervaat, F. E., van der Gaag, A., Smetsers, C., Barneveld, P. C., van't Veer, M., Teeuwen, K., van Suijlekom, H., Dekker, L., Wijnbergen, I. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10270247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24016
_version_ 1785059293334077440
author Vervaat, F. E.
van der Gaag, A.
Smetsers, C.
Barneveld, P. C.
van't Veer, M.
Teeuwen, K.
van Suijlekom, H.
Dekker, L.
Wijnbergen, I. F.
author_facet Vervaat, F. E.
van der Gaag, A.
Smetsers, C.
Barneveld, P. C.
van't Veer, M.
Teeuwen, K.
van Suijlekom, H.
Dekker, L.
Wijnbergen, I. F.
author_sort Vervaat, F. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is still under debate. Studies up to date have shown a positive effect with an improvement in quality of life. However, no double blinded randomized controlled trials have been performed. HYPOTHESIS & METHODS: The objective of this trial is to investigate if high density SCS leads to a significant reduction in the amount of myocardial ischemia in patients with RAP. Eligible patients must meet the criteria for RAP, have proven ischemia and a positive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator treadmill test. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive an implanted spinal cord stimulator. Patients receive 6 months of high density SCS and 6 months of no stimulation using a cross‐over design. The order of the treatment options is determined using randomization. The primary endpoint is the effect of SCS measured by the change in percentage of myocardial ischemia using myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography scan. Key secondary endpoints are patient related outcome measures, major cardiac adverse events and safety endpoints. The follow‐up period is 1 year for the primary and key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The SCRAP trial began enrollment on December 21, 2021 and is set to complete the primary assessments in June 2025. To date, January 2, 2023, 18 patients have been enrolled in the study and 3 patients have completed the 1‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: The SCRAP trial is an investigator‐initiated, single‐center, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, and cross‐over randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of SCS in patients with RAP. (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04915157)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10270247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102702472023-06-16 Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial Vervaat, F. E. van der Gaag, A. Smetsers, C. Barneveld, P. C. van't Veer, M. Teeuwen, K. van Suijlekom, H. Dekker, L. Wijnbergen, I. F. Clin Cardiol Clinical Study Design BACKGROUND: The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is still under debate. Studies up to date have shown a positive effect with an improvement in quality of life. However, no double blinded randomized controlled trials have been performed. HYPOTHESIS & METHODS: The objective of this trial is to investigate if high density SCS leads to a significant reduction in the amount of myocardial ischemia in patients with RAP. Eligible patients must meet the criteria for RAP, have proven ischemia and a positive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator treadmill test. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive an implanted spinal cord stimulator. Patients receive 6 months of high density SCS and 6 months of no stimulation using a cross‐over design. The order of the treatment options is determined using randomization. The primary endpoint is the effect of SCS measured by the change in percentage of myocardial ischemia using myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography scan. Key secondary endpoints are patient related outcome measures, major cardiac adverse events and safety endpoints. The follow‐up period is 1 year for the primary and key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The SCRAP trial began enrollment on December 21, 2021 and is set to complete the primary assessments in June 2025. To date, January 2, 2023, 18 patients have been enrolled in the study and 3 patients have completed the 1‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: The SCRAP trial is an investigator‐initiated, single‐center, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, and cross‐over randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of SCS in patients with RAP. (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04915157) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10270247/ /pubmed/37013654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24016 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study Design
Vervaat, F. E.
van der Gaag, A.
Smetsers, C.
Barneveld, P. C.
van't Veer, M.
Teeuwen, K.
van Suijlekom, H.
Dekker, L.
Wijnbergen, I. F.
Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial
title Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial
title_full Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial
title_fullStr Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial
title_full_unstemmed Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial
title_short Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial
title_sort design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (scrap) trial
topic Clinical Study Design
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10270247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24016
work_keys_str_mv AT vervaatfe designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial
AT vandergaaga designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial
AT smetsersc designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial
AT barneveldpc designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial
AT vantveerm designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial
AT teeuwenk designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial
AT vansuijlekomh designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial
AT dekkerl designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial
AT wijnbergenif designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial