Cargando…
Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial
BACKGROUND: The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is still under debate. Studies up to date have shown a positive effect with an improvement in quality of life. However, no double blinded randomized controlled trials have been performed. HYPOTHESI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10270247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24016 |
_version_ | 1785059293334077440 |
---|---|
author | Vervaat, F. E. van der Gaag, A. Smetsers, C. Barneveld, P. C. van't Veer, M. Teeuwen, K. van Suijlekom, H. Dekker, L. Wijnbergen, I. F. |
author_facet | Vervaat, F. E. van der Gaag, A. Smetsers, C. Barneveld, P. C. van't Veer, M. Teeuwen, K. van Suijlekom, H. Dekker, L. Wijnbergen, I. F. |
author_sort | Vervaat, F. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is still under debate. Studies up to date have shown a positive effect with an improvement in quality of life. However, no double blinded randomized controlled trials have been performed. HYPOTHESIS & METHODS: The objective of this trial is to investigate if high density SCS leads to a significant reduction in the amount of myocardial ischemia in patients with RAP. Eligible patients must meet the criteria for RAP, have proven ischemia and a positive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator treadmill test. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive an implanted spinal cord stimulator. Patients receive 6 months of high density SCS and 6 months of no stimulation using a cross‐over design. The order of the treatment options is determined using randomization. The primary endpoint is the effect of SCS measured by the change in percentage of myocardial ischemia using myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography scan. Key secondary endpoints are patient related outcome measures, major cardiac adverse events and safety endpoints. The follow‐up period is 1 year for the primary and key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The SCRAP trial began enrollment on December 21, 2021 and is set to complete the primary assessments in June 2025. To date, January 2, 2023, 18 patients have been enrolled in the study and 3 patients have completed the 1‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: The SCRAP trial is an investigator‐initiated, single‐center, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, and cross‐over randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of SCS in patients with RAP. (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04915157) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10270247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102702472023-06-16 Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial Vervaat, F. E. van der Gaag, A. Smetsers, C. Barneveld, P. C. van't Veer, M. Teeuwen, K. van Suijlekom, H. Dekker, L. Wijnbergen, I. F. Clin Cardiol Clinical Study Design BACKGROUND: The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is still under debate. Studies up to date have shown a positive effect with an improvement in quality of life. However, no double blinded randomized controlled trials have been performed. HYPOTHESIS & METHODS: The objective of this trial is to investigate if high density SCS leads to a significant reduction in the amount of myocardial ischemia in patients with RAP. Eligible patients must meet the criteria for RAP, have proven ischemia and a positive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator treadmill test. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive an implanted spinal cord stimulator. Patients receive 6 months of high density SCS and 6 months of no stimulation using a cross‐over design. The order of the treatment options is determined using randomization. The primary endpoint is the effect of SCS measured by the change in percentage of myocardial ischemia using myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography scan. Key secondary endpoints are patient related outcome measures, major cardiac adverse events and safety endpoints. The follow‐up period is 1 year for the primary and key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The SCRAP trial began enrollment on December 21, 2021 and is set to complete the primary assessments in June 2025. To date, January 2, 2023, 18 patients have been enrolled in the study and 3 patients have completed the 1‐year follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: The SCRAP trial is an investigator‐initiated, single‐center, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, and cross‐over randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of SCS in patients with RAP. (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04915157) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10270247/ /pubmed/37013654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24016 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Design Vervaat, F. E. van der Gaag, A. Smetsers, C. Barneveld, P. C. van't Veer, M. Teeuwen, K. van Suijlekom, H. Dekker, L. Wijnbergen, I. F. Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial |
title | Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial |
title_full | Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial |
title_fullStr | Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial |
title_short | Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial |
title_sort | design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (scrap) trial |
topic | Clinical Study Design |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10270247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vervaatfe designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial AT vandergaaga designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial AT smetsersc designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial AT barneveldpc designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial AT vantveerm designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial AT teeuwenk designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial AT vansuijlekomh designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial AT dekkerl designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial AT wijnbergenif designandrationaleoftheefficacyofspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithrefractoryanginapectorisscraptrial |