Cargando…

Effect of febuxostat on the level of malondialdehyde‐modified low‐density lipoprotein, an oxidative stress marker: A subanalysis of the PRIZE study

BACKGROUND: Febuxostat is a selective xanthine oxidase inhibitor that reportedly exhibits antioxidant properties. We previously performed a multicentre, randomized controlled (PRIZE) study for vascular evaluation under uric acid (UA) control by febuxostat to investigate the progression of carotid le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teragawa, Hiroki, Tanaka, Atsushi, Fujii, Yuichi, Yoshida, Hisako, Ueda, Tomohiro, Nomura, Shuichi, Kadokami, Toshiaki, Koide, Hisashi, Saito, Makoto, Sano, Hiroaki, Bando, Yasuko K., Murohara, Toyoaki, Node, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10270262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36991567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24014
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Febuxostat is a selective xanthine oxidase inhibitor that reportedly exhibits antioxidant properties. We previously performed a multicentre, randomized controlled (PRIZE) study for vascular evaluation under uric acid (UA) control by febuxostat to investigate the progression of carotid lesions in asymptomatic hyperuricemic patients with carotid atherosclerosis for 2 years. HYPOTHESIS: The current subanalysis of the PRIZE study aimed to assess the effect of febuxostat on the level of malondialdehyde‐modified low‐density lipoprotein (MDA‐LDL), an oxidative stress marker. METHODS: We recruited 383 patients (febuxostat group, n = 200; control group, n = 183) from the PRIZE trial for whom MDA‐LDL measurements were available. The UA, MDA‐LDL, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) levels, and MDA‐LDL/LDL‐C ratio were identified, represented as the estimated difference from baseline to 24 months. We also evaluated the relationship between febuxostat dose (10, ≤20 to <40, and ≤40 to ≤60 mg) and changes in the MDA‐LDL level, LDL‐C level, or MDA‐LDL/LDL‐C ratios. RESULTS: The estimated change in MDA‐LDL/LDL‐C ratio from baseline to 24 months was significantly lower in the febuxostat group than in the control group (p = .025), whereas the estimated changes in MDA‐LDL (p = .235) and LDL‐C (p = .323) levels did not differ between the two groups. No significant correlation existed between the febuxostat doses and the estimated change in the MDA‐LDL level (p = .626), LDL‐C level (p = .896), or MDA‐LDL/LDL‐C ratio (p = .747). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may indicate a possibility that febuxostat can lower the MDA‐LDL/LDL‐C ratio, a potential marker of atherosclerosis and oxidative stress, in asymptomatic hyperuricemic patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Further studies are required to validate our findings and elucidate the clinical antioxidant effect of febuxostat.