Cargando…
Epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli at the human-animal-environment interface in a farming community of central Uganda
BACKGROUND: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) represents a significant global public health concern. The epidemiology of ESBL-Ec in Uganda is not well understood although it is harbored by humans, animals, and the environment. This study explains the epidemiology...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10270331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37310955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001344 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) represents a significant global public health concern. The epidemiology of ESBL-Ec in Uganda is not well understood although it is harbored by humans, animals, and the environment. This study explains the epidemiology of ESBL-Ec using a one health approach in selected farming households in Wakiso district, Uganda. METHODOLOGY: Environmental, human, and animal samples were collected from 104 households. Additional data were obtained using observation checklists and through interviews with household members using a semi-structured questionnaire. Surface swabs, soil, water, human and animal fecal samples were introduced onto ESBL chromogenic agar. The isolates were identified using biochemical tests and double-disk synergy tests. To assess associations, prevalence ratios (PRs) were computed using a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis with modified Poisson and a log link with robust standard errors in R software. RESULTS: Approximately 83% (86/104) households had at least one positive ESBL-Ec isolate. The overall prevalence of ESBL-Ec at the human-animal-environment interface was approximately 25.0% (95% CI: 22.7–28.3). Specifically, humans, animals and the environment had an ESBL-Ec prevalence of 35.4%, 55.4%, and 9.2% respectively. Having visitors (adj PR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04–1.36), utilizing veterinary services (adj PR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.20–1.61) and using animal waste for gardening (adj PR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05–1.60) were positively associated with household ESBL-Ec contamination. Covering the drinking water container with a lid (adj PR = 0.84 95% CI: 0.73–0.96) was associated with absence of ESBL-Ec in a household. CONCLUSION: There is wider dissemination of ESBL-Ec in the environment, humans, and animals, indicating poor infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in the area. Improved collaborative one health mitigation strategies such as safe water chain, farm biosecurity, household and facility-based IPC measures are recommended to reduce the burden of antimicrobial resistance at community level. |
---|