Cargando…

Utility of isolated-check visual evoked potential technique in dysthyroid optic neuropathy

PURPOSE: To analyze the utility of isolated-check visual evoked potential (icVEP) for discriminating between eyes with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) and eyes with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) but not DON. METHODS: Forty-three eyes with TAO but not DON (as non-DON), fifty-three eyes wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Ban, Liu, Rong, Wang, Shanluxi, Hu, Weikun, Li, Yunping, Tong, Boding, Zhang, Hong, Qi, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10271890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36642765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-05975-9
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To analyze the utility of isolated-check visual evoked potential (icVEP) for discriminating between eyes with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) and eyes with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) but not DON. METHODS: Forty-three eyes with TAO but not DON (as non-DON), fifty-three eyes with DON, and sixty healthy eyes (as controls) were included. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including best-corrected visual acuity, refraction, color vision test, intraocular pressure measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, RAPD, exophthalmometry measurements, pVEP test, icVEP test, standard automated perimetry, and clinical activity score classification of TAO, as well as demographic information, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: In the DON group, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) value of icVEPs decreased significantly compared with that of the non-DON group as well as control (p < 0.05). The SNR values under 8%, 16% and 32% depth of modulation (DOM) were significantly negatively correlated with BCVA (p < 0.05, r =  − 0.9 ~  − 0.6), papilledema (Y/N) (p < 0.05, r =  − 0.8 ~ 0.4) and DON (Y/N) (p < 0.001, r =  − 0.7 ~  − 0.5). The 8% DOM of icVEP had the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.842) for discriminating DON from non-DONs. Meanwhile, decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that patients clinically benefit most from 8% DOM of icVEP. Furthermore, the 8% DOM of icVEP combing with papilledema (Y/N) and BCVA (Model 1) has significantly larger AUC than the 8% DOM of icVEP (p = 0.0364), and has better clinical benefit in DCA analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The SNR of 8% DOM from icVEP may represent a significant ancillary diagnostic method for DON detection. Furthermore, icVEP combined with papilledema (Y/N) and BCVA should be considered as a diagnostic model in future clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00417-023-05975-9.