Cargando…

Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Long-term stretching of human skeletal muscles increases joint range of motion through altered stretch perception and decreased resistance to stretch. There is also some evidence that stretching induces changes in muscle morphology. However, research is limited and inconclusive. OBJECTIV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panidi, Ioli, Donti, Olyvia, Konrad, Andreas, Dinas, Petros C., Terzis, Gerasimos, Mouratidis, Athanasios, Gaspari, Vasiliki, Donti, Anastasia, Bogdanis, Gregory C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10271914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-023-00591-7
_version_ 1785059405648101376
author Panidi, Ioli
Donti, Olyvia
Konrad, Andreas
Dinas, Petros C.
Terzis, Gerasimos
Mouratidis, Athanasios
Gaspari, Vasiliki
Donti, Anastasia
Bogdanis, Gregory C.
author_facet Panidi, Ioli
Donti, Olyvia
Konrad, Andreas
Dinas, Petros C.
Terzis, Gerasimos
Mouratidis, Athanasios
Gaspari, Vasiliki
Donti, Anastasia
Bogdanis, Gregory C.
author_sort Panidi, Ioli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-term stretching of human skeletal muscles increases joint range of motion through altered stretch perception and decreased resistance to stretch. There is also some evidence that stretching induces changes in muscle morphology. However, research is limited and inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of static stretching training on muscle architecture (i.e., fascicle length and fascicle angle, muscle thickness and cross-sectional area) in healthy participants. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed Central, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus were searched. Randomized controlled trials and controlled trials without randomization were included. No restrictions on language or date of publication were applied. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Subgroup analyses and random-effects meta-regressions were also performed using total stretching volume and intensity as covariates. Quality of evidence was determined by GRADE analysis. RESULTS: From the 2946 records retrieved, 19 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (n = 467 participants). Risk of bias was low in 83.9% of all criteria. Confidence in cumulative evidence was high. Stretching training induces trivial increases in fascicle length at rest (SMD = 0.17; 95% CI 0.01–0.33; p = 0.042) and small increases in fascicle length during stretching (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.74; p = 0.026). No increases were observed in fascicle angle or muscle thickness (p = 0.30 and p = 0.18, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed that fascicle length increased when high stretching volumes were used (p < 0.004), while no changes were found for low stretching volumes (p = 0.60; subgroup difference: p = 0.025). High stretching intensities induced fascicle length increases (p < 0.006), while low stretching intensities did not have an effect (p = 0.72; subgroup difference: p = 0.042). Also, high intensity stretching resulted in increased muscle thickness (p = 0.021). Meta-regression analyses showed that longitudinal fascicle growth was positively associated with stretching volume (p < 0.02) and intensity (p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Static stretching training increases fascicle length at rest and during stretching in healthy participants. High, but not low, stretching volumes and intensities induce longitudinal fascicle growth, while high stretching intensities result in increased muscle thickness. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42021289884. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-023-00591-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10271914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102719142023-06-17 Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Panidi, Ioli Donti, Olyvia Konrad, Andreas Dinas, Petros C. Terzis, Gerasimos Mouratidis, Athanasios Gaspari, Vasiliki Donti, Anastasia Bogdanis, Gregory C. Sports Med Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Long-term stretching of human skeletal muscles increases joint range of motion through altered stretch perception and decreased resistance to stretch. There is also some evidence that stretching induces changes in muscle morphology. However, research is limited and inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of static stretching training on muscle architecture (i.e., fascicle length and fascicle angle, muscle thickness and cross-sectional area) in healthy participants. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed Central, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus were searched. Randomized controlled trials and controlled trials without randomization were included. No restrictions on language or date of publication were applied. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Subgroup analyses and random-effects meta-regressions were also performed using total stretching volume and intensity as covariates. Quality of evidence was determined by GRADE analysis. RESULTS: From the 2946 records retrieved, 19 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (n = 467 participants). Risk of bias was low in 83.9% of all criteria. Confidence in cumulative evidence was high. Stretching training induces trivial increases in fascicle length at rest (SMD = 0.17; 95% CI 0.01–0.33; p = 0.042) and small increases in fascicle length during stretching (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.74; p = 0.026). No increases were observed in fascicle angle or muscle thickness (p = 0.30 and p = 0.18, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed that fascicle length increased when high stretching volumes were used (p < 0.004), while no changes were found for low stretching volumes (p = 0.60; subgroup difference: p = 0.025). High stretching intensities induced fascicle length increases (p < 0.006), while low stretching intensities did not have an effect (p = 0.72; subgroup difference: p = 0.042). Also, high intensity stretching resulted in increased muscle thickness (p = 0.021). Meta-regression analyses showed that longitudinal fascicle growth was positively associated with stretching volume (p < 0.02) and intensity (p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Static stretching training increases fascicle length at rest and during stretching in healthy participants. High, but not low, stretching volumes and intensities induce longitudinal fascicle growth, while high stretching intensities result in increased muscle thickness. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42021289884. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-023-00591-7. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10271914/ /pubmed/37318696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-023-00591-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Panidi, Ioli
Donti, Olyvia
Konrad, Andreas
Dinas, Petros C.
Terzis, Gerasimos
Mouratidis, Athanasios
Gaspari, Vasiliki
Donti, Anastasia
Bogdanis, Gregory C.
Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_short Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_sort muscle architecture adaptations to static stretching training: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10271914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-023-00591-7
work_keys_str_mv AT panidiioli musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT dontiolyvia musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT konradandreas musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT dinaspetrosc musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT terzisgerasimos musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT mouratidisathanasios musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT gasparivasiliki musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT dontianastasia musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT bogdanisgregoryc musclearchitectureadaptationstostaticstretchingtrainingasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis