Cargando…
A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally
Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2 |
_version_ | 1785059418262470656 |
---|---|
author | Malherbe, HL Modell , B Blencowe , H Strong , KL Aldous , C |
author_facet | Malherbe, HL Modell , B Blencowe , H Strong , KL Aldous , C |
author_sort | Malherbe, HL |
collection | PubMed |
description | Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of the contribution of birth defects to under-5 child mortality and morbidity are generated by several groups globally. These estimates often differ, causing confusion for policymakers. While some differences may be attributed to the data sources and methods used, much is due to a lack of clarity in the terminology used for the group of disorders classed as “congenital”. This study aimed to gain insight into the diversity of terms and definitions for birth defects, including those used routinely by relevant international/national organisations and in the peer-reviewed literature. This two-part study included (1) scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify terms and definitions in use for birth defects and (2) review of key websites and grey literature to identify terms and definitions used. The results of this study indicate a wide variety of terms being used, often interchangeably and undefined, in peer-reviewed publications, on institutional websites and related literature. This suggests a lack of clarity related to terminology and sets the scene for further discussion, recommending that the community of practice working on birth defects comes to a consensus on standard terminology and definitions for global uptake and implementation. Such standardisation will facilitate a common understanding of the burden of these disorders globally, regionally and within countries so that action can be taken to support affected children and their families. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10272040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102720402023-06-17 A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally Malherbe, HL Modell , B Blencowe , H Strong , KL Aldous , C J Community Genet Research Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of the contribution of birth defects to under-5 child mortality and morbidity are generated by several groups globally. These estimates often differ, causing confusion for policymakers. While some differences may be attributed to the data sources and methods used, much is due to a lack of clarity in the terminology used for the group of disorders classed as “congenital”. This study aimed to gain insight into the diversity of terms and definitions for birth defects, including those used routinely by relevant international/national organisations and in the peer-reviewed literature. This two-part study included (1) scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify terms and definitions in use for birth defects and (2) review of key websites and grey literature to identify terms and definitions used. The results of this study indicate a wide variety of terms being used, often interchangeably and undefined, in peer-reviewed publications, on institutional websites and related literature. This suggests a lack of clarity related to terminology and sets the scene for further discussion, recommending that the community of practice working on birth defects comes to a consensus on standard terminology and definitions for global uptake and implementation. Such standardisation will facilitate a common understanding of the burden of these disorders globally, regionally and within countries so that action can be taken to support affected children and their families. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-24 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10272040/ /pubmed/37093545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Malherbe, HL Modell , B Blencowe , H Strong , KL Aldous , C A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally |
title | A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally |
title_full | A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally |
title_fullStr | A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally |
title_short | A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally |
title_sort | review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malherbehl areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT modellb areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT blencoweh areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT strongkl areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT aldousc areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT malherbehl reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT modellb reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT blencoweh reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT strongkl reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally AT aldousc reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally |