Cargando…

A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally

Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malherbe, HL, Modell , B, Blencowe , H, Strong , KL, Aldous , C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2
_version_ 1785059418262470656
author Malherbe, HL
Modell , B
Blencowe , H
Strong , KL
Aldous , C
author_facet Malherbe, HL
Modell , B
Blencowe , H
Strong , KL
Aldous , C
author_sort Malherbe, HL
collection PubMed
description Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of the contribution of birth defects to under-5 child mortality and morbidity are generated by several groups globally. These estimates often differ, causing confusion for policymakers. While some differences may be attributed to the data sources and methods used, much is due to a lack of clarity in the terminology used for the group of disorders classed as “congenital”. This study aimed to gain insight into the diversity of terms and definitions for birth defects, including those used routinely by relevant international/national organisations and in the peer-reviewed literature. This two-part study included (1) scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify terms and definitions in use for birth defects and (2) review of key websites and grey literature to identify terms and definitions used. The results of this study indicate a wide variety of terms being used, often interchangeably and undefined, in peer-reviewed publications, on institutional websites and related literature. This suggests a lack of clarity related to terminology and sets the scene for further discussion, recommending that the community of practice working on birth defects comes to a consensus on standard terminology and definitions for global uptake and implementation. Such standardisation will facilitate a common understanding of the burden of these disorders globally, regionally and within countries so that action can be taken to support affected children and their families. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102720402023-06-17 A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally Malherbe, HL Modell , B Blencowe , H Strong , KL Aldous , C J Community Genet Research Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of the contribution of birth defects to under-5 child mortality and morbidity are generated by several groups globally. These estimates often differ, causing confusion for policymakers. While some differences may be attributed to the data sources and methods used, much is due to a lack of clarity in the terminology used for the group of disorders classed as “congenital”. This study aimed to gain insight into the diversity of terms and definitions for birth defects, including those used routinely by relevant international/national organisations and in the peer-reviewed literature. This two-part study included (1) scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify terms and definitions in use for birth defects and (2) review of key websites and grey literature to identify terms and definitions used. The results of this study indicate a wide variety of terms being used, often interchangeably and undefined, in peer-reviewed publications, on institutional websites and related literature. This suggests a lack of clarity related to terminology and sets the scene for further discussion, recommending that the community of practice working on birth defects comes to a consensus on standard terminology and definitions for global uptake and implementation. Such standardisation will facilitate a common understanding of the burden of these disorders globally, regionally and within countries so that action can be taken to support affected children and their families. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-24 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10272040/ /pubmed/37093545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Malherbe, HL
Modell , B
Blencowe , H
Strong , KL
Aldous , C
A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally
title A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally
title_full A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally
title_fullStr A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally
title_full_unstemmed A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally
title_short A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally
title_sort review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00642-2
work_keys_str_mv AT malherbehl areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT modellb areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT blencoweh areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT strongkl areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT aldousc areviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT malherbehl reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT modellb reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT blencoweh reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT strongkl reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally
AT aldousc reviewofkeyterminologyanddefinitionsusedforbirthdefectsglobally