Cargando…

Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach

Despite the widespread interest in electrospinning technology, very few simulation studies have been conducted. Thus, the current research produced a system for providing a sustainable and effective electrospinning process by combining the design of experiments with machine learning prediction model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pervez, Md. Nahid, Yeo, Wan Sieng, Mishu, Mst. Monira Rahman, Talukder, Md. Eman, Roy, Hridoy, Islam, Md. Shahinoor, Zhao, Yaping, Cai, Yingjie, Stylios, George K., Naddeo, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37322139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36431-7
_version_ 1785059450051100672
author Pervez, Md. Nahid
Yeo, Wan Sieng
Mishu, Mst. Monira Rahman
Talukder, Md. Eman
Roy, Hridoy
Islam, Md. Shahinoor
Zhao, Yaping
Cai, Yingjie
Stylios, George K.
Naddeo, Vincenzo
author_facet Pervez, Md. Nahid
Yeo, Wan Sieng
Mishu, Mst. Monira Rahman
Talukder, Md. Eman
Roy, Hridoy
Islam, Md. Shahinoor
Zhao, Yaping
Cai, Yingjie
Stylios, George K.
Naddeo, Vincenzo
author_sort Pervez, Md. Nahid
collection PubMed
description Despite the widespread interest in electrospinning technology, very few simulation studies have been conducted. Thus, the current research produced a system for providing a sustainable and effective electrospinning process by combining the design of experiments with machine learning prediction models. Specifically, in order to estimate the diameter of the electrospun nanofiber membrane, we developed a locally weighted kernel partial least squares regression (LW-KPLSR) model based on a response surface methodology (RSM). The accuracy of the model's predictions was evaluated based on its root mean square error (RMSE), its mean absolute error (MAE), and its coefficient of determination (R(2)). In addition to principal component regression (PCR), locally weighted partial least squares regression (LW-PLSR), partial least square regression (PLSR), and least square support vector regression model (LSSVR), some of the other types of regression models used to verify and compare the results were fuzzy modelling and least square support vector regression model (LSSVR). According to the results of our research, the LW-KPLSR model performed far better than other competing models when attempting to forecast the membrane's diameter. This is made clear by the much lower RMSE and MAE values of the LW-KPLSR model. In addition, it offered the highest R(2) values that could be achieved, reaching 0.9989.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102722352023-06-17 Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach Pervez, Md. Nahid Yeo, Wan Sieng Mishu, Mst. Monira Rahman Talukder, Md. Eman Roy, Hridoy Islam, Md. Shahinoor Zhao, Yaping Cai, Yingjie Stylios, George K. Naddeo, Vincenzo Sci Rep Article Despite the widespread interest in electrospinning technology, very few simulation studies have been conducted. Thus, the current research produced a system for providing a sustainable and effective electrospinning process by combining the design of experiments with machine learning prediction models. Specifically, in order to estimate the diameter of the electrospun nanofiber membrane, we developed a locally weighted kernel partial least squares regression (LW-KPLSR) model based on a response surface methodology (RSM). The accuracy of the model's predictions was evaluated based on its root mean square error (RMSE), its mean absolute error (MAE), and its coefficient of determination (R(2)). In addition to principal component regression (PCR), locally weighted partial least squares regression (LW-PLSR), partial least square regression (PLSR), and least square support vector regression model (LSSVR), some of the other types of regression models used to verify and compare the results were fuzzy modelling and least square support vector regression model (LSSVR). According to the results of our research, the LW-KPLSR model performed far better than other competing models when attempting to forecast the membrane's diameter. This is made clear by the much lower RMSE and MAE values of the LW-KPLSR model. In addition, it offered the highest R(2) values that could be achieved, reaching 0.9989. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10272235/ /pubmed/37322139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36431-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Pervez, Md. Nahid
Yeo, Wan Sieng
Mishu, Mst. Monira Rahman
Talukder, Md. Eman
Roy, Hridoy
Islam, Md. Shahinoor
Zhao, Yaping
Cai, Yingjie
Stylios, George K.
Naddeo, Vincenzo
Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
title Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
title_full Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
title_fullStr Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
title_full_unstemmed Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
title_short Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
title_sort electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37322139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36431-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pervezmdnahid electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT yeowansieng electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT mishumstmonirarahman electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT talukdermdeman electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT royhridoy electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT islammdshahinoor electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT zhaoyaping electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT caiyingjie electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT styliosgeorgek electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach
AT naddeovincenzo electrospunnanofibermembranediameterpredictionusingacombinedresponsesurfacemethodologyandmachinelearningapproach