Cargando…

Differences in engineers’ brain activity when CAD modelling from isometric and orthographic projections

A way of presenting information in visual representations of technical systems influences the progress and the outcome of the engineering design process. Consequently, improving the means by and through which information is utilised during the process is one suggested approach to advancing engineeri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukačević, Fanika, Becattini, Niccolò, Perišić, Marija Majda, Škec, Stanko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37322108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36823-9
_version_ 1785059451492892672
author Lukačević, Fanika
Becattini, Niccolò
Perišić, Marija Majda
Škec, Stanko
author_facet Lukačević, Fanika
Becattini, Niccolò
Perišić, Marija Majda
Škec, Stanko
author_sort Lukačević, Fanika
collection PubMed
description A way of presenting information in visual representations of technical systems influences the progress and the outcome of the engineering design process. Consequently, improving the means by and through which information is utilised during the process is one suggested approach to advancing engineering design. Engineers’ interaction with visual representations of technical systems is mainly visual and virtual. Although such interactions are cognitively complex, little is known about cognition (mental information processing) underlying the utilisation of design information during engineering design. To narrow the research gap, this study explores how visual representations of technical systems affect engineers’ brain activity while generating computer-aided design (CAD) models based on them. More precisely, the brain activity of 20 engineers is captured and analysed using electroencephalography (EEG) during the visuospatially-intensive design tasks of CAD modelling in two conditions; when technical systems are presented with orthographic and isometric projections in technical drawings. The results imply the sensitivity of engineers’ brain activity in CAD modelling to the visual representation from which a technical system is interpreted. In particular, significant differences are found in theta, alpha, and beta task-related power (TRP) over the cortex when interpreting the technical drawings and CAD modelling from them. Furthermore, the results reveal significant differences in theta and alpha TRP when considering the individual electrodes, the cortical hemispheres, and the cortical areas. In particular, theta TRP over the right hemisphere and the frontal area seems essential in distinguishing neurocognitive responses to the orthographic and isometric projections. As such, the conducted exploratory study sets the foundations for exploring engineers’ brain activity while performing visuospatially-intensive design tasks, whose segments are relatable to the aspects of visuospatial thinking. Future work will explore brain activity in other design activities that are highly visuospatial, with a larger sample size and an EEG device of a higher spatial resolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102722402023-06-17 Differences in engineers’ brain activity when CAD modelling from isometric and orthographic projections Lukačević, Fanika Becattini, Niccolò Perišić, Marija Majda Škec, Stanko Sci Rep Article A way of presenting information in visual representations of technical systems influences the progress and the outcome of the engineering design process. Consequently, improving the means by and through which information is utilised during the process is one suggested approach to advancing engineering design. Engineers’ interaction with visual representations of technical systems is mainly visual and virtual. Although such interactions are cognitively complex, little is known about cognition (mental information processing) underlying the utilisation of design information during engineering design. To narrow the research gap, this study explores how visual representations of technical systems affect engineers’ brain activity while generating computer-aided design (CAD) models based on them. More precisely, the brain activity of 20 engineers is captured and analysed using electroencephalography (EEG) during the visuospatially-intensive design tasks of CAD modelling in two conditions; when technical systems are presented with orthographic and isometric projections in technical drawings. The results imply the sensitivity of engineers’ brain activity in CAD modelling to the visual representation from which a technical system is interpreted. In particular, significant differences are found in theta, alpha, and beta task-related power (TRP) over the cortex when interpreting the technical drawings and CAD modelling from them. Furthermore, the results reveal significant differences in theta and alpha TRP when considering the individual electrodes, the cortical hemispheres, and the cortical areas. In particular, theta TRP over the right hemisphere and the frontal area seems essential in distinguishing neurocognitive responses to the orthographic and isometric projections. As such, the conducted exploratory study sets the foundations for exploring engineers’ brain activity while performing visuospatially-intensive design tasks, whose segments are relatable to the aspects of visuospatial thinking. Future work will explore brain activity in other design activities that are highly visuospatial, with a larger sample size and an EEG device of a higher spatial resolution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10272240/ /pubmed/37322108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36823-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lukačević, Fanika
Becattini, Niccolò
Perišić, Marija Majda
Škec, Stanko
Differences in engineers’ brain activity when CAD modelling from isometric and orthographic projections
title Differences in engineers’ brain activity when CAD modelling from isometric and orthographic projections
title_full Differences in engineers’ brain activity when CAD modelling from isometric and orthographic projections
title_fullStr Differences in engineers’ brain activity when CAD modelling from isometric and orthographic projections
title_full_unstemmed Differences in engineers’ brain activity when CAD modelling from isometric and orthographic projections
title_short Differences in engineers’ brain activity when CAD modelling from isometric and orthographic projections
title_sort differences in engineers’ brain activity when cad modelling from isometric and orthographic projections
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37322108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36823-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lukacevicfanika differencesinengineersbrainactivitywhencadmodellingfromisometricandorthographicprojections
AT becattininiccolo differencesinengineersbrainactivitywhencadmodellingfromisometricandorthographicprojections
AT perisicmarijamajda differencesinengineersbrainactivitywhencadmodellingfromisometricandorthographicprojections
AT skecstanko differencesinengineersbrainactivitywhencadmodellingfromisometricandorthographicprojections