Cargando…
Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies
Cannabis self-administration studies may be helpful for identifying factors that influence cannabis consumption and subjective response to cannabis. Additionally, these paradigms could be useful for testing novel pharmacotherapies for cannabis use disorder. This scoping review aims to summarize the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37157001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06360-4 |
_version_ | 1785059454812684288 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Ke Bin Grennell, Erin Ngoy, Anthony George, Tony P. Le Foll, Bernard Hendershot, Christian S. Sloan, Matthew E. |
author_facet | Xiao, Ke Bin Grennell, Erin Ngoy, Anthony George, Tony P. Le Foll, Bernard Hendershot, Christian S. Sloan, Matthew E. |
author_sort | Xiao, Ke Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cannabis self-administration studies may be helpful for identifying factors that influence cannabis consumption and subjective response to cannabis. Additionally, these paradigms could be useful for testing novel pharmacotherapies for cannabis use disorder. This scoping review aims to summarize the findings from existing ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies to determine what has been learned from these studies as well as their limitations. We examined studies that specifically examined cannabis smoking, focusing on subjective response and self-administration behavior (e.g., smoking topography). A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and Embase from inception to October 22, 2022. Our search strategy identified 26 studies (total N = 662, 79% male) that met our eligibility criteria. We found that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration significantly affected subjective response to cannabis in some but not all studies. In general, cannabis self-administration tended to be most intense at the beginning of the laboratory session and decreased in later parts of the session. There was limited data on cannabis self-administration in adults older than 55. Data on external validity and test-retest reliability were also limited. Addressing these limitations in future ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies could lead to more valid and generalizable paradigms, which in turn could be used to improve our understanding of cannabis use patterns and to help guide medication development for cannabis use disorder. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00213-023-06360-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10272254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102722542023-06-17 Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies Xiao, Ke Bin Grennell, Erin Ngoy, Anthony George, Tony P. Le Foll, Bernard Hendershot, Christian S. Sloan, Matthew E. Psychopharmacology (Berl) Review Cannabis self-administration studies may be helpful for identifying factors that influence cannabis consumption and subjective response to cannabis. Additionally, these paradigms could be useful for testing novel pharmacotherapies for cannabis use disorder. This scoping review aims to summarize the findings from existing ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies to determine what has been learned from these studies as well as their limitations. We examined studies that specifically examined cannabis smoking, focusing on subjective response and self-administration behavior (e.g., smoking topography). A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and Embase from inception to October 22, 2022. Our search strategy identified 26 studies (total N = 662, 79% male) that met our eligibility criteria. We found that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration significantly affected subjective response to cannabis in some but not all studies. In general, cannabis self-administration tended to be most intense at the beginning of the laboratory session and decreased in later parts of the session. There was limited data on cannabis self-administration in adults older than 55. Data on external validity and test-retest reliability were also limited. Addressing these limitations in future ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies could lead to more valid and generalizable paradigms, which in turn could be used to improve our understanding of cannabis use patterns and to help guide medication development for cannabis use disorder. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00213-023-06360-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10272254/ /pubmed/37157001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06360-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Xiao, Ke Bin Grennell, Erin Ngoy, Anthony George, Tony P. Le Foll, Bernard Hendershot, Christian S. Sloan, Matthew E. Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies |
title | Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies |
title_full | Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies |
title_fullStr | Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies |
title_short | Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies |
title_sort | cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37157001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06360-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaokebin cannabisselfadministrationinthehumanlaboratoryascopingreviewofadlibitumstudies AT grennellerin cannabisselfadministrationinthehumanlaboratoryascopingreviewofadlibitumstudies AT ngoyanthony cannabisselfadministrationinthehumanlaboratoryascopingreviewofadlibitumstudies AT georgetonyp cannabisselfadministrationinthehumanlaboratoryascopingreviewofadlibitumstudies AT lefollbernard cannabisselfadministrationinthehumanlaboratoryascopingreviewofadlibitumstudies AT hendershotchristians cannabisselfadministrationinthehumanlaboratoryascopingreviewofadlibitumstudies AT sloanmatthewe cannabisselfadministrationinthehumanlaboratoryascopingreviewofadlibitumstudies |