Cargando…
An Improved Peer-Review System to Compensate for Scientific Misconduct in Health-Sensitive Topics
Autores principales: | Rovetta, Alessandro, Garavaglia, Rossana, Vitale, Alessandro, Meccia, Ettore, Terefe Tesfaye, Behailu, Mezzana, Paolo, Accurso, Vincenzo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2023.1605601 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Common Statistical Errors in Scientific Investigations: A Simple Guide to Avoid Unfounded Decisions
por: Rovetta, Alessandro
Publicado: (2023) -
No-Fault Compensation Schemes for COVID-19 Vaccines: Best Practice Hallmarks
por: Fairgrieve, Duncan, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
«I Do Not Have Time»—Is This the End of Peer Review in Public Health Sciences?
por: Künzli, Nino, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Prevalences of Parental and Peer Support and Their Independent Associations With Mental Distress and Unhealthy Behaviours in 53 Countries
por: Li, Lian, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Finding of scientific misconduct.
Publicado: (1995)