Cargando…

Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction

This analysis reports on the outcomes of two different steroid sparing immunosuppression protocols used in the management of 120 highly sensitised patients (HSPs) with cRF>85% receiving Alemtuzumab induction, 53 maintained on tacrolimus (FK) monotherapy and 67 tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofeti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Eva, Spensley, Katrina, Gunby, Nicola, Clarke, Candice, Anand, Arthi, Roufosse, Candice, Willicombe, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11056
_version_ 1785059488366067712
author Santos, Eva
Spensley, Katrina
Gunby, Nicola
Clarke, Candice
Anand, Arthi
Roufosse, Candice
Willicombe, Michelle
author_facet Santos, Eva
Spensley, Katrina
Gunby, Nicola
Clarke, Candice
Anand, Arthi
Roufosse, Candice
Willicombe, Michelle
author_sort Santos, Eva
collection PubMed
description This analysis reports on the outcomes of two different steroid sparing immunosuppression protocols used in the management of 120 highly sensitised patients (HSPs) with cRF>85% receiving Alemtuzumab induction, 53 maintained on tacrolimus (FK) monotherapy and 67 tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (FK + MMF). There was no difference in the median cRF or mode of sensitisation between the two groups, although the FK + MMF cohort received more poorly matched grafts. There was no difference in one-year patient or allograft survival, however rejection free survival was inferior with FK monotherapy compared with FK + MMF at 65.4% and 91.4% respectively, p < 0.01. DSA-free survival was comparable. Whilst there was no difference in rates of BK between the cohorts, CMV-free survival was inferior in the FK + MMF group at 86.0% compared with 98.1% in the FK group, p = 0.026. One-year post-transplant diabetes free survival was 89.6% and 100.0% in the FK and FK + MMF group respectively, p = 0.027, the difference attributed to the use of prednisolone to treat rejection in the FK cohort, p = 0.006. We report good outcomes in HSPs utilising a steroid sparing protocol with Alemtuzumab induction and FK + MMF maintenance and provide granular data on immunological and infectious complications to inform steroid avoidance in these patient groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102724122023-06-17 Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction Santos, Eva Spensley, Katrina Gunby, Nicola Clarke, Candice Anand, Arthi Roufosse, Candice Willicombe, Michelle Transpl Int Health Archive This analysis reports on the outcomes of two different steroid sparing immunosuppression protocols used in the management of 120 highly sensitised patients (HSPs) with cRF>85% receiving Alemtuzumab induction, 53 maintained on tacrolimus (FK) monotherapy and 67 tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (FK + MMF). There was no difference in the median cRF or mode of sensitisation between the two groups, although the FK + MMF cohort received more poorly matched grafts. There was no difference in one-year patient or allograft survival, however rejection free survival was inferior with FK monotherapy compared with FK + MMF at 65.4% and 91.4% respectively, p < 0.01. DSA-free survival was comparable. Whilst there was no difference in rates of BK between the cohorts, CMV-free survival was inferior in the FK + MMF group at 86.0% compared with 98.1% in the FK group, p = 0.026. One-year post-transplant diabetes free survival was 89.6% and 100.0% in the FK and FK + MMF group respectively, p = 0.027, the difference attributed to the use of prednisolone to treat rejection in the FK cohort, p = 0.006. We report good outcomes in HSPs utilising a steroid sparing protocol with Alemtuzumab induction and FK + MMF maintenance and provide granular data on immunological and infectious complications to inform steroid avoidance in these patient groups. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10272412/ /pubmed/37334011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11056 Text en Copyright © 2023 Santos, Spensley, Gunby, Clarke, Anand, Roufosse and Willicombe. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Health Archive
Santos, Eva
Spensley, Katrina
Gunby, Nicola
Clarke, Candice
Anand, Arthi
Roufosse, Candice
Willicombe, Michelle
Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction
title Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction
title_full Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction
title_fullStr Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction
title_full_unstemmed Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction
title_short Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction
title_sort steroid sparing maintenance immunosuppression in highly sensitised patients receiving alemtuzumab induction
topic Health Archive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11056
work_keys_str_mv AT santoseva steroidsparingmaintenanceimmunosuppressioninhighlysensitisedpatientsreceivingalemtuzumabinduction
AT spensleykatrina steroidsparingmaintenanceimmunosuppressioninhighlysensitisedpatientsreceivingalemtuzumabinduction
AT gunbynicola steroidsparingmaintenanceimmunosuppressioninhighlysensitisedpatientsreceivingalemtuzumabinduction
AT clarkecandice steroidsparingmaintenanceimmunosuppressioninhighlysensitisedpatientsreceivingalemtuzumabinduction
AT anandarthi steroidsparingmaintenanceimmunosuppressioninhighlysensitisedpatientsreceivingalemtuzumabinduction
AT roufossecandice steroidsparingmaintenanceimmunosuppressioninhighlysensitisedpatientsreceivingalemtuzumabinduction
AT willicombemichelle steroidsparingmaintenanceimmunosuppressioninhighlysensitisedpatientsreceivingalemtuzumabinduction