Cargando…

Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: While a growing body of research is adopting Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)-related methods and constructs, there is still a lack of comprehensive reviews on the state of published research on Positive Valence Systems (PVS) and Negative Valence Systems (NVS) in mood and anxiety disord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böttger, Sarah Jane, Förstner, Bernd R., Szalek, Laura, Koller-Schlaud, Kristin, Rapp, Michael A., Tschorn, Mira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1184978
_version_ 1785059501784694784
author Böttger, Sarah Jane
Förstner, Bernd R.
Szalek, Laura
Koller-Schlaud, Kristin
Rapp, Michael A.
Tschorn, Mira
author_facet Böttger, Sarah Jane
Förstner, Bernd R.
Szalek, Laura
Koller-Schlaud, Kristin
Rapp, Michael A.
Tschorn, Mira
author_sort Böttger, Sarah Jane
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While a growing body of research is adopting Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)-related methods and constructs, there is still a lack of comprehensive reviews on the state of published research on Positive Valence Systems (PVS) and Negative Valence Systems (NVS) in mood and anxiety disorders consistent with the RDoC framework. METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed publications covering research on “positive valence” and “negative valence” as well as “valence,” “affect,” and “emotion” for individuals with symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders. Data was extracted with a focus on disorder, domain, (sub-) constructs, units of analysis, key results, and study design. Findings are presented along four sections, distinguishing between primary articles and reviews each for PVS, NVS, and cross-domain PVS and NVS. RESULTS: A total of 231 abstracts were identified, and 43 met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. Seventeen publications addressed research on PVS, seventeen on NVS, and nine covered cross-domain research on PVS and NVS. Psychological constructs were typically examined across different units of analysis, with the majority of publications incorporating two or more measures. Molecular, genetic, and physiological aspects were mainly investigated via review articles, primary articles focused on self-report, behavioral, and, to a lesser extent, physiological measures. CONCLUSIONS: This present scoping review shows that mood and anxiety disorders were actively studied using a range of genetic, molecular, neuronal, physiological, behavioral, and self-report measures within the RDoC PVS and NVS. Results highlight the essential role of specific cortical frontal brain structures and of subcortical limbic structures in impaired emotional processing in mood and anxiety disorders. Findings also indicate overall limited research on NVS in bipolar disorders and PVS in anxiety disorders, a majority of self-report studies, and predominantly observational studies. Future research is needed to develop more RDoC-consistent advancements and intervention studies targeting neuroscience-driven PVS and NVS constructs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102724682023-06-17 Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review Böttger, Sarah Jane Förstner, Bernd R. Szalek, Laura Koller-Schlaud, Kristin Rapp, Michael A. Tschorn, Mira Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: While a growing body of research is adopting Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)-related methods and constructs, there is still a lack of comprehensive reviews on the state of published research on Positive Valence Systems (PVS) and Negative Valence Systems (NVS) in mood and anxiety disorders consistent with the RDoC framework. METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed publications covering research on “positive valence” and “negative valence” as well as “valence,” “affect,” and “emotion” for individuals with symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders. Data was extracted with a focus on disorder, domain, (sub-) constructs, units of analysis, key results, and study design. Findings are presented along four sections, distinguishing between primary articles and reviews each for PVS, NVS, and cross-domain PVS and NVS. RESULTS: A total of 231 abstracts were identified, and 43 met the inclusion criteria for this scoping review. Seventeen publications addressed research on PVS, seventeen on NVS, and nine covered cross-domain research on PVS and NVS. Psychological constructs were typically examined across different units of analysis, with the majority of publications incorporating two or more measures. Molecular, genetic, and physiological aspects were mainly investigated via review articles, primary articles focused on self-report, behavioral, and, to a lesser extent, physiological measures. CONCLUSIONS: This present scoping review shows that mood and anxiety disorders were actively studied using a range of genetic, molecular, neuronal, physiological, behavioral, and self-report measures within the RDoC PVS and NVS. Results highlight the essential role of specific cortical frontal brain structures and of subcortical limbic structures in impaired emotional processing in mood and anxiety disorders. Findings also indicate overall limited research on NVS in bipolar disorders and PVS in anxiety disorders, a majority of self-report studies, and predominantly observational studies. Future research is needed to develop more RDoC-consistent advancements and intervention studies targeting neuroscience-driven PVS and NVS constructs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10272468/ /pubmed/37333832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1184978 Text en Copyright © 2023 Böttger, Förstner, Szalek, Koller-Schlaud, Rapp and Tschorn. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Böttger, Sarah Jane
Förstner, Bernd R.
Szalek, Laura
Koller-Schlaud, Kristin
Rapp, Michael A.
Tschorn, Mira
Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review
title Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review
title_full Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review
title_fullStr Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review
title_short Mood and anxiety disorders within the Research Domain Criteria framework of Positive and Negative Valence Systems: a scoping review
title_sort mood and anxiety disorders within the research domain criteria framework of positive and negative valence systems: a scoping review
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1184978
work_keys_str_mv AT bottgersarahjane moodandanxietydisorderswithintheresearchdomaincriteriaframeworkofpositiveandnegativevalencesystemsascopingreview
AT forstnerberndr moodandanxietydisorderswithintheresearchdomaincriteriaframeworkofpositiveandnegativevalencesystemsascopingreview
AT szaleklaura moodandanxietydisorderswithintheresearchdomaincriteriaframeworkofpositiveandnegativevalencesystemsascopingreview
AT kollerschlaudkristin moodandanxietydisorderswithintheresearchdomaincriteriaframeworkofpositiveandnegativevalencesystemsascopingreview
AT rappmichaela moodandanxietydisorderswithintheresearchdomaincriteriaframeworkofpositiveandnegativevalencesystemsascopingreview
AT tschornmira moodandanxietydisorderswithintheresearchdomaincriteriaframeworkofpositiveandnegativevalencesystemsascopingreview