Cargando…

Electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: A case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise

OBJECTIVE: In online health communities (OHCs), patients often list their physicians’ expertise by user-generated tags based on their consulted diseases. These expertise tags play an essential role in recommending the match of physicians to future patients. However, few studies have examined the imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Haiyan, Chiu, Ya-Ling, Wang, Jying-Nan, Yu, Jiang, Hsu, Yuan-Teng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231180693
_version_ 1785059544924160000
author Yu, Haiyan
Chiu, Ya-Ling
Wang, Jying-Nan
Yu, Jiang
Hsu, Yuan-Teng
author_facet Yu, Haiyan
Chiu, Ya-Ling
Wang, Jying-Nan
Yu, Jiang
Hsu, Yuan-Teng
author_sort Yu, Haiyan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In online health communities (OHCs), patients often list their physicians’ expertise by user-generated tags based on their consulted diseases. These expertise tags play an essential role in recommending the match of physicians to future patients. However, few studies have examined the impact of the accessibility of e-consults on patient assessments using marking of the physicians’ expertise in OHCs. This study aims to investigate what are the patient assessments of the physicians’ expertise if they have e-consult accessibility. METHODS: Through a case–control study, this article examined the effect of e-consult accessibility on patient-generated tags of physician expertise in OHCs. With data collected from the Good Doctor website, the samples consisted of 9841 physicians from 1255 different hospitals widely distributed in China. The breadth of voted expertise (BE) is measured by the number of consulted disease-related labels marked by a physician's served patients (SP). The volume of votes (VV) is measured by the number of a physician's votes given by the SP. The degree of voted diversity (DD) is measured by the information entropy of each physician's service expertise (labeled and voted by patients). The data analysis of e-consult accessibility is conducted by estimating the average treatment effect on the DD of physicians’ expertise. RESULTS: For the BE, its mean was 7.305 for the case group of physicians with e-consults accessible (photo and text queries), while the mean was 9.465 for the control for physicians without e-consults. For the VV, its mean was 39.720 for the case group, while the mean was 84.565 for the control. For the DD, its mean on patient-generated tags was 2.103 for the case group, which is 0.413 lower than the control group. CONCLUSION: The availability of e-consults increases the concentration on physician expertise in the patient-generated tags. e-Consults reinforce the increment of the already-received physician expertise (reflected in tags), reducing the tag information diversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102726482023-06-17 Electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: A case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise Yu, Haiyan Chiu, Ya-Ling Wang, Jying-Nan Yu, Jiang Hsu, Yuan-Teng Digit Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: In online health communities (OHCs), patients often list their physicians’ expertise by user-generated tags based on their consulted diseases. These expertise tags play an essential role in recommending the match of physicians to future patients. However, few studies have examined the impact of the accessibility of e-consults on patient assessments using marking of the physicians’ expertise in OHCs. This study aims to investigate what are the patient assessments of the physicians’ expertise if they have e-consult accessibility. METHODS: Through a case–control study, this article examined the effect of e-consult accessibility on patient-generated tags of physician expertise in OHCs. With data collected from the Good Doctor website, the samples consisted of 9841 physicians from 1255 different hospitals widely distributed in China. The breadth of voted expertise (BE) is measured by the number of consulted disease-related labels marked by a physician's served patients (SP). The volume of votes (VV) is measured by the number of a physician's votes given by the SP. The degree of voted diversity (DD) is measured by the information entropy of each physician's service expertise (labeled and voted by patients). The data analysis of e-consult accessibility is conducted by estimating the average treatment effect on the DD of physicians’ expertise. RESULTS: For the BE, its mean was 7.305 for the case group of physicians with e-consults accessible (photo and text queries), while the mean was 9.465 for the control for physicians without e-consults. For the VV, its mean was 39.720 for the case group, while the mean was 84.565 for the control. For the DD, its mean on patient-generated tags was 2.103 for the case group, which is 0.413 lower than the control group. CONCLUSION: The availability of e-consults increases the concentration on physician expertise in the patient-generated tags. e-Consults reinforce the increment of the already-received physician expertise (reflected in tags), reducing the tag information diversity. SAGE Publications 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10272648/ /pubmed/37334321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231180693 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yu, Haiyan
Chiu, Ya-Ling
Wang, Jying-Nan
Yu, Jiang
Hsu, Yuan-Teng
Electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: A case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise
title Electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: A case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise
title_full Electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: A case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise
title_fullStr Electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: A case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise
title_full_unstemmed Electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: A case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise
title_short Electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: A case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise
title_sort electronic consultation accessibility influence on patient assessments: a case–control study with user-generated tags of physician expertise
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231180693
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhaiyan electronicconsultationaccessibilityinfluenceonpatientassessmentsacasecontrolstudywithusergeneratedtagsofphysicianexpertise
AT chiuyaling electronicconsultationaccessibilityinfluenceonpatientassessmentsacasecontrolstudywithusergeneratedtagsofphysicianexpertise
AT wangjyingnan electronicconsultationaccessibilityinfluenceonpatientassessmentsacasecontrolstudywithusergeneratedtagsofphysicianexpertise
AT yujiang electronicconsultationaccessibilityinfluenceonpatientassessmentsacasecontrolstudywithusergeneratedtagsofphysicianexpertise
AT hsuyuanteng electronicconsultationaccessibilityinfluenceonpatientassessmentsacasecontrolstudywithusergeneratedtagsofphysicianexpertise