Cargando…
Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation
Introduction: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is often part of myeloablative conditioning in acute leukemia. Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based plans employ arcs to the inferior-most portion of the body that can be simulated in a head-first position and use 2D planning for t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231180779 |
_version_ | 1785059547743780864 |
---|---|
author | Keit, Emily Liveringhouse, Casey Figura, Nicholas Weygand, Joseph Sandoval, Maria L. Garcia, Genevieve Peters, Julia Nieder, Michael Faramand, Rawan Khimani, Farhad Kim, Sungjune Robinson, Timothy J. Johnstone, Peter A.S. Penagaricano, Jose Latifi, Kujtim |
author_facet | Keit, Emily Liveringhouse, Casey Figura, Nicholas Weygand, Joseph Sandoval, Maria L. Garcia, Genevieve Peters, Julia Nieder, Michael Faramand, Rawan Khimani, Farhad Kim, Sungjune Robinson, Timothy J. Johnstone, Peter A.S. Penagaricano, Jose Latifi, Kujtim |
author_sort | Keit, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is often part of myeloablative conditioning in acute leukemia. Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based plans employ arcs to the inferior-most portion of the body that can be simulated in a head-first position and use 2D planning for the inferior body which can result in heterogeneous doses. Here, we describe our institution's unique protocol for delivering high-dose TBI entirely with VMAT and retrospectively compare dosimetric outcomes with helical tomotherapy (HT) plans. Additionally, we describe our method of oropharyngeal mucosal sparing that was implemented after fatal mucositis occurred in two patients. Methods: Thirty-one patients were simulated and treated in head-first (HFS) and feet-first (FFS) orientations. Patients were treated with VMAT (n = 26) or HT (n = 5). In VMAT plans, to synchronize doses between the orientations, images were deformably registered and the HFS dose was transferred to the FFS plan and used as a background dose when optimizing plans. Six to eight isocenters with two arcs per isocenter were generated. HT was delivered with an established technique. Patients were treated to 13.2 Gy over eight twice daily fractions. Dosimetric outcomes and toxicities were retrospectively compared. Results: Prescription dose and organ at risk (OAR) constraints were met for all patients. Lower lung doses were achieved with VMAT relative to HT plans (7.4 vs 7.7 Gy, P = .009). Statistically significant improvement in mucositis was not achieved after adopting a mucosal-sparing technique, however lower doses to the oropharyngeal mucosal were achieved (6.9 vs 14.1 Gy, P = .009), and no further mucositis-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This full-body VMAT method of TBI achieves dose goals, eliminates risk of heterogenous doses within the femur, and demonstrates that selective OAR sparing with the purpose of reducing TBI-related morbidity and mortality is possible at any institution with a VMAT-capable linear accelerator. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10272663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102726632023-06-17 Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation Keit, Emily Liveringhouse, Casey Figura, Nicholas Weygand, Joseph Sandoval, Maria L. Garcia, Genevieve Peters, Julia Nieder, Michael Faramand, Rawan Khimani, Farhad Kim, Sungjune Robinson, Timothy J. Johnstone, Peter A.S. Penagaricano, Jose Latifi, Kujtim Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Introduction: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is often part of myeloablative conditioning in acute leukemia. Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based plans employ arcs to the inferior-most portion of the body that can be simulated in a head-first position and use 2D planning for the inferior body which can result in heterogeneous doses. Here, we describe our institution's unique protocol for delivering high-dose TBI entirely with VMAT and retrospectively compare dosimetric outcomes with helical tomotherapy (HT) plans. Additionally, we describe our method of oropharyngeal mucosal sparing that was implemented after fatal mucositis occurred in two patients. Methods: Thirty-one patients were simulated and treated in head-first (HFS) and feet-first (FFS) orientations. Patients were treated with VMAT (n = 26) or HT (n = 5). In VMAT plans, to synchronize doses between the orientations, images were deformably registered and the HFS dose was transferred to the FFS plan and used as a background dose when optimizing plans. Six to eight isocenters with two arcs per isocenter were generated. HT was delivered with an established technique. Patients were treated to 13.2 Gy over eight twice daily fractions. Dosimetric outcomes and toxicities were retrospectively compared. Results: Prescription dose and organ at risk (OAR) constraints were met for all patients. Lower lung doses were achieved with VMAT relative to HT plans (7.4 vs 7.7 Gy, P = .009). Statistically significant improvement in mucositis was not achieved after adopting a mucosal-sparing technique, however lower doses to the oropharyngeal mucosal were achieved (6.9 vs 14.1 Gy, P = .009), and no further mucositis-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This full-body VMAT method of TBI achieves dose goals, eliminates risk of heterogenous doses within the femur, and demonstrates that selective OAR sparing with the purpose of reducing TBI-related morbidity and mortality is possible at any institution with a VMAT-capable linear accelerator. SAGE Publications 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10272663/ /pubmed/37287260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231180779 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Keit, Emily Liveringhouse, Casey Figura, Nicholas Weygand, Joseph Sandoval, Maria L. Garcia, Genevieve Peters, Julia Nieder, Michael Faramand, Rawan Khimani, Farhad Kim, Sungjune Robinson, Timothy J. Johnstone, Peter A.S. Penagaricano, Jose Latifi, Kujtim Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation |
title | Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation |
title_full | Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation |
title_short | Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation |
title_sort | feasibility and toxicity of full-body volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for high-dose total body irradiation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231180779 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keitemily feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT liveringhousecasey feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT figuranicholas feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT weygandjoseph feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT sandovalmarial feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT garciagenevieve feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT petersjulia feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT niedermichael feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT faramandrawan feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT khimanifarhad feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT kimsungjune feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT robinsontimothyj feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT johnstonepeteras feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT penagaricanojose feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation AT latifikujtim feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation |