Cargando…

Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation

Introduction: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is often part of myeloablative conditioning in acute leukemia. Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based plans employ arcs to the inferior-most portion of the body that can be simulated in a head-first position and use 2D planning for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keit, Emily, Liveringhouse, Casey, Figura, Nicholas, Weygand, Joseph, Sandoval, Maria L., Garcia, Genevieve, Peters, Julia, Nieder, Michael, Faramand, Rawan, Khimani, Farhad, Kim, Sungjune, Robinson, Timothy J., Johnstone, Peter A.S., Penagaricano, Jose, Latifi, Kujtim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231180779
_version_ 1785059547743780864
author Keit, Emily
Liveringhouse, Casey
Figura, Nicholas
Weygand, Joseph
Sandoval, Maria L.
Garcia, Genevieve
Peters, Julia
Nieder, Michael
Faramand, Rawan
Khimani, Farhad
Kim, Sungjune
Robinson, Timothy J.
Johnstone, Peter A.S.
Penagaricano, Jose
Latifi, Kujtim
author_facet Keit, Emily
Liveringhouse, Casey
Figura, Nicholas
Weygand, Joseph
Sandoval, Maria L.
Garcia, Genevieve
Peters, Julia
Nieder, Michael
Faramand, Rawan
Khimani, Farhad
Kim, Sungjune
Robinson, Timothy J.
Johnstone, Peter A.S.
Penagaricano, Jose
Latifi, Kujtim
author_sort Keit, Emily
collection PubMed
description Introduction: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is often part of myeloablative conditioning in acute leukemia. Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based plans employ arcs to the inferior-most portion of the body that can be simulated in a head-first position and use 2D planning for the inferior body which can result in heterogeneous doses. Here, we describe our institution's unique protocol for delivering high-dose TBI entirely with VMAT and retrospectively compare dosimetric outcomes with helical tomotherapy (HT) plans. Additionally, we describe our method of oropharyngeal mucosal sparing that was implemented after fatal mucositis occurred in two patients. Methods: Thirty-one patients were simulated and treated in head-first (HFS) and feet-first (FFS) orientations. Patients were treated with VMAT (n = 26) or HT (n = 5). In VMAT plans, to synchronize doses between the orientations, images were deformably registered and the HFS dose was transferred to the FFS plan and used as a background dose when optimizing plans. Six to eight isocenters with two arcs per isocenter were generated. HT was delivered with an established technique. Patients were treated to 13.2 Gy over eight twice daily fractions. Dosimetric outcomes and toxicities were retrospectively compared. Results: Prescription dose and organ at risk (OAR) constraints were met for all patients. Lower lung doses were achieved with VMAT relative to HT plans (7.4 vs 7.7 Gy, P = .009). Statistically significant improvement in mucositis was not achieved after adopting a mucosal-sparing technique, however lower doses to the oropharyngeal mucosal were achieved (6.9 vs 14.1 Gy, P = .009), and no further mucositis-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This full-body VMAT method of TBI achieves dose goals, eliminates risk of heterogenous doses within the femur, and demonstrates that selective OAR sparing with the purpose of reducing TBI-related morbidity and mortality is possible at any institution with a VMAT-capable linear accelerator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102726632023-06-17 Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation Keit, Emily Liveringhouse, Casey Figura, Nicholas Weygand, Joseph Sandoval, Maria L. Garcia, Genevieve Peters, Julia Nieder, Michael Faramand, Rawan Khimani, Farhad Kim, Sungjune Robinson, Timothy J. Johnstone, Peter A.S. Penagaricano, Jose Latifi, Kujtim Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Introduction: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is often part of myeloablative conditioning in acute leukemia. Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based plans employ arcs to the inferior-most portion of the body that can be simulated in a head-first position and use 2D planning for the inferior body which can result in heterogeneous doses. Here, we describe our institution's unique protocol for delivering high-dose TBI entirely with VMAT and retrospectively compare dosimetric outcomes with helical tomotherapy (HT) plans. Additionally, we describe our method of oropharyngeal mucosal sparing that was implemented after fatal mucositis occurred in two patients. Methods: Thirty-one patients were simulated and treated in head-first (HFS) and feet-first (FFS) orientations. Patients were treated with VMAT (n = 26) or HT (n = 5). In VMAT plans, to synchronize doses between the orientations, images were deformably registered and the HFS dose was transferred to the FFS plan and used as a background dose when optimizing plans. Six to eight isocenters with two arcs per isocenter were generated. HT was delivered with an established technique. Patients were treated to 13.2 Gy over eight twice daily fractions. Dosimetric outcomes and toxicities were retrospectively compared. Results: Prescription dose and organ at risk (OAR) constraints were met for all patients. Lower lung doses were achieved with VMAT relative to HT plans (7.4 vs 7.7 Gy, P = .009). Statistically significant improvement in mucositis was not achieved after adopting a mucosal-sparing technique, however lower doses to the oropharyngeal mucosal were achieved (6.9 vs 14.1 Gy, P = .009), and no further mucositis-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This full-body VMAT method of TBI achieves dose goals, eliminates risk of heterogenous doses within the femur, and demonstrates that selective OAR sparing with the purpose of reducing TBI-related morbidity and mortality is possible at any institution with a VMAT-capable linear accelerator. SAGE Publications 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10272663/ /pubmed/37287260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231180779 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Keit, Emily
Liveringhouse, Casey
Figura, Nicholas
Weygand, Joseph
Sandoval, Maria L.
Garcia, Genevieve
Peters, Julia
Nieder, Michael
Faramand, Rawan
Khimani, Farhad
Kim, Sungjune
Robinson, Timothy J.
Johnstone, Peter A.S.
Penagaricano, Jose
Latifi, Kujtim
Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation
title Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation
title_full Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation
title_fullStr Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation
title_short Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation
title_sort feasibility and toxicity of full-body volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for high-dose total body irradiation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231180779
work_keys_str_mv AT keitemily feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT liveringhousecasey feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT figuranicholas feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT weygandjoseph feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT sandovalmarial feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT garciagenevieve feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT petersjulia feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT niedermichael feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT faramandrawan feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT khimanifarhad feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT kimsungjune feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT robinsontimothyj feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT johnstonepeteras feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT penagaricanojose feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation
AT latifikujtim feasibilityandtoxicityoffullbodyvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueforhighdosetotalbodyirradiation