Cargando…
Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients’ perspectives. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. DESIGN: A process evaluation, using a mixed met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231173624 |
_version_ | 1785059547991244800 |
---|---|
author | Schick-Makaroff, Kara Klarenbach, Scott Kwon, Jae-Yung Cohen, S. Robin Czupryn, Joanna Lee, Loretta Pauly, Robert MacRae, Jennifer M. Forde, Bruce Sawatzky, Richard |
author_facet | Schick-Makaroff, Kara Klarenbach, Scott Kwon, Jae-Yung Cohen, S. Robin Czupryn, Joanna Lee, Loretta Pauly, Robert MacRae, Jennifer M. Forde, Bruce Sawatzky, Richard |
author_sort | Schick-Makaroff, Kara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients’ perspectives. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. DESIGN: A process evaluation, using a mixed methods longitudinal comparative concurrent design was undertaken of educational support to clinicians on routine use of ePROs. In two urban home dialysis clinics in Alberta, Canada, patients completed ePROs. At the implementation site, clinicians were provided with ePROs and clinician-oriented education via voluntary workshops. At the non-implementation site, neither were provided. Person-centered care was measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-20 (PACIC-20). METHODS: Longitudinal structural equation models (SEMs) compared change in overall PACIC scores. The interpretive description approach, using thematic analysis of qualitative data, further evaluated processes of implementation. RESULTS: Data were collected from questionnaires completed by 543 patients, 4 workshops, 15 focus groups, and 37 interviews. There was no overall difference in person-centered care throughout the study, including after delivery of workshops. The longitudinal SEMs revealed substantial individual-level variability in overall PACIC trajectories. However, there was no improvement at the implementation site and no difference between the sites during both the pre- and post-workshop periods. Similar results were obtained for each PACIC domain. Qualitative analysis provided insights into why there was no substantial difference between sites: (1) clinicians wanted to see kidney symptoms, not quality of life, (2) workshops were tailored to clinicians’ educational needs, not patients’ needs, and (3) variable use of ePRO data by clinicians. CONCLUSION: Training clinicians on use of ePROs is complex and likely only part of what is required to enhance person-centered care. REGISTRATION: NCT03149328. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03149328 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10272664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102726642023-06-17 Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians Schick-Makaroff, Kara Klarenbach, Scott Kwon, Jae-Yung Cohen, S. Robin Czupryn, Joanna Lee, Loretta Pauly, Robert MacRae, Jennifer M. Forde, Bruce Sawatzky, Richard Ther Adv Chronic Dis Chronic Kidney Disease BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients’ perspectives. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. DESIGN: A process evaluation, using a mixed methods longitudinal comparative concurrent design was undertaken of educational support to clinicians on routine use of ePROs. In two urban home dialysis clinics in Alberta, Canada, patients completed ePROs. At the implementation site, clinicians were provided with ePROs and clinician-oriented education via voluntary workshops. At the non-implementation site, neither were provided. Person-centered care was measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-20 (PACIC-20). METHODS: Longitudinal structural equation models (SEMs) compared change in overall PACIC scores. The interpretive description approach, using thematic analysis of qualitative data, further evaluated processes of implementation. RESULTS: Data were collected from questionnaires completed by 543 patients, 4 workshops, 15 focus groups, and 37 interviews. There was no overall difference in person-centered care throughout the study, including after delivery of workshops. The longitudinal SEMs revealed substantial individual-level variability in overall PACIC trajectories. However, there was no improvement at the implementation site and no difference between the sites during both the pre- and post-workshop periods. Similar results were obtained for each PACIC domain. Qualitative analysis provided insights into why there was no substantial difference between sites: (1) clinicians wanted to see kidney symptoms, not quality of life, (2) workshops were tailored to clinicians’ educational needs, not patients’ needs, and (3) variable use of ePRO data by clinicians. CONCLUSION: Training clinicians on use of ePROs is complex and likely only part of what is required to enhance person-centered care. REGISTRATION: NCT03149328. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03149328 SAGE Publications 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10272664/ /pubmed/37332391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231173624 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Chronic Kidney Disease Schick-Makaroff, Kara Klarenbach, Scott Kwon, Jae-Yung Cohen, S. Robin Czupryn, Joanna Lee, Loretta Pauly, Robert MacRae, Jennifer M. Forde, Bruce Sawatzky, Richard Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians |
title | Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians |
title_full | Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians |
title_fullStr | Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians |
title_short | Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians |
title_sort | electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (epro kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians |
topic | Chronic Kidney Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231173624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schickmakaroffkara electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT klarenbachscott electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT kwonjaeyung electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT cohensrobin electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT czuprynjoanna electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT leeloretta electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT paulyrobert electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT macraejenniferm electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT fordebruce electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians AT sawatzkyrichard electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians |