Cargando…

Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients’ perspectives. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. DESIGN: A process evaluation, using a mixed met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schick-Makaroff, Kara, Klarenbach, Scott, Kwon, Jae-Yung, Cohen, S. Robin, Czupryn, Joanna, Lee, Loretta, Pauly, Robert, MacRae, Jennifer M., Forde, Bruce, Sawatzky, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231173624
_version_ 1785059547991244800
author Schick-Makaroff, Kara
Klarenbach, Scott
Kwon, Jae-Yung
Cohen, S. Robin
Czupryn, Joanna
Lee, Loretta
Pauly, Robert
MacRae, Jennifer M.
Forde, Bruce
Sawatzky, Richard
author_facet Schick-Makaroff, Kara
Klarenbach, Scott
Kwon, Jae-Yung
Cohen, S. Robin
Czupryn, Joanna
Lee, Loretta
Pauly, Robert
MacRae, Jennifer M.
Forde, Bruce
Sawatzky, Richard
author_sort Schick-Makaroff, Kara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients’ perspectives. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. DESIGN: A process evaluation, using a mixed methods longitudinal comparative concurrent design was undertaken of educational support to clinicians on routine use of ePROs. In two urban home dialysis clinics in Alberta, Canada, patients completed ePROs. At the implementation site, clinicians were provided with ePROs and clinician-oriented education via voluntary workshops. At the non-implementation site, neither were provided. Person-centered care was measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-20 (PACIC-20). METHODS: Longitudinal structural equation models (SEMs) compared change in overall PACIC scores. The interpretive description approach, using thematic analysis of qualitative data, further evaluated processes of implementation. RESULTS: Data were collected from questionnaires completed by 543 patients, 4 workshops, 15 focus groups, and 37 interviews. There was no overall difference in person-centered care throughout the study, including after delivery of workshops. The longitudinal SEMs revealed substantial individual-level variability in overall PACIC trajectories. However, there was no improvement at the implementation site and no difference between the sites during both the pre- and post-workshop periods. Similar results were obtained for each PACIC domain. Qualitative analysis provided insights into why there was no substantial difference between sites: (1) clinicians wanted to see kidney symptoms, not quality of life, (2) workshops were tailored to clinicians’ educational needs, not patients’ needs, and (3) variable use of ePRO data by clinicians. CONCLUSION: Training clinicians on use of ePROs is complex and likely only part of what is required to enhance person-centered care. REGISTRATION: NCT03149328. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03149328
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102726642023-06-17 Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians Schick-Makaroff, Kara Klarenbach, Scott Kwon, Jae-Yung Cohen, S. Robin Czupryn, Joanna Lee, Loretta Pauly, Robert MacRae, Jennifer M. Forde, Bruce Sawatzky, Richard Ther Adv Chronic Dis Chronic Kidney Disease BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients’ perspectives. OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. DESIGN: A process evaluation, using a mixed methods longitudinal comparative concurrent design was undertaken of educational support to clinicians on routine use of ePROs. In two urban home dialysis clinics in Alberta, Canada, patients completed ePROs. At the implementation site, clinicians were provided with ePROs and clinician-oriented education via voluntary workshops. At the non-implementation site, neither were provided. Person-centered care was measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-20 (PACIC-20). METHODS: Longitudinal structural equation models (SEMs) compared change in overall PACIC scores. The interpretive description approach, using thematic analysis of qualitative data, further evaluated processes of implementation. RESULTS: Data were collected from questionnaires completed by 543 patients, 4 workshops, 15 focus groups, and 37 interviews. There was no overall difference in person-centered care throughout the study, including after delivery of workshops. The longitudinal SEMs revealed substantial individual-level variability in overall PACIC trajectories. However, there was no improvement at the implementation site and no difference between the sites during both the pre- and post-workshop periods. Similar results were obtained for each PACIC domain. Qualitative analysis provided insights into why there was no substantial difference between sites: (1) clinicians wanted to see kidney symptoms, not quality of life, (2) workshops were tailored to clinicians’ educational needs, not patients’ needs, and (3) variable use of ePRO data by clinicians. CONCLUSION: Training clinicians on use of ePROs is complex and likely only part of what is required to enhance person-centered care. REGISTRATION: NCT03149328. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03149328 SAGE Publications 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10272664/ /pubmed/37332391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231173624 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Chronic Kidney Disease
Schick-Makaroff, Kara
Klarenbach, Scott
Kwon, Jae-Yung
Cohen, S. Robin
Czupryn, Joanna
Lee, Loretta
Pauly, Robert
MacRae, Jennifer M.
Forde, Bruce
Sawatzky, Richard
Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians
title Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians
title_full Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians
title_fullStr Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians
title_short Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians
title_sort electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (epro kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians
topic Chronic Kidney Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231173624
work_keys_str_mv AT schickmakaroffkara electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT klarenbachscott electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT kwonjaeyung electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT cohensrobin electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT czuprynjoanna electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT leeloretta electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT paulyrobert electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT macraejenniferm electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT fordebruce electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians
AT sawatzkyrichard electronicpatientreportedoutcomesinclinicalkidneypracticeeprokidneyaprocessevaluationofeducationalsupportforclinicians