Cargando…
The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with tube-like stomach reconstruction (LPG-TLR) are both function-preserving procedures performed for treating AEG. However, there is no clinical consensus on the selection of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137836 |
_version_ | 1785059585808138240 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Zhiwen Chen, Jinping Chen, Shaoqin Lin, Hexin Zhao, Kang Zheng, Changyue Liu, Huibin Chen, Zhihua Fu, Yongan Hong, Qingqi Lin, Wei Yan, Su You, Jun |
author_facet | Xu, Zhiwen Chen, Jinping Chen, Shaoqin Lin, Hexin Zhao, Kang Zheng, Changyue Liu, Huibin Chen, Zhihua Fu, Yongan Hong, Qingqi Lin, Wei Yan, Su You, Jun |
author_sort | Xu, Zhiwen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with tube-like stomach reconstruction (LPG-TLR) are both function-preserving procedures performed for treating AEG. However, there is no clinical consensus on the selection of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and the best way to reconstruct the digestive tract remains controversial. This study aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of LPG-DTR and LPG-TLR to provide some reference to the choice of AEG surgical modalities. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. we collected clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with consecutive cases diagnosed with AEG from January 2016 to June 2021 in five medical centers. According to the way of digestive tract reconstruction after tumor resection, patients who underwent LPG-DTR or LPG-TLR were included in the present study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline variables that might affect the study outcomes. The QOL of the patients was evaluated using the Visick grade. RESULTS: A total of 124 eligible consecutive cases were finally included. Patients in both groups were matched using the PSM method, and 55 patients from each group were included in the analysis after PSM. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the operation time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, days of postoperative abdominal drainage tube placement, postoperative hospitalization days, total hospitalization cost, the total number of lymph nodes cleared, and the number of positive lymph nodes (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of time to first flatus after surgery and postoperative soft food recovery time (P<0.05). For the nutritional status, the weight levels at 1 year after surgery was better in the LPG-DTR group than in the LPG-TLR group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Visick grade between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The anti-reflux effect and quality of life of LPG-DTR for AEG were comparable to those of LPG-TLR. Compared with LPG-TLR, LPG-DTR provide better nutrition status for patients with AEG. LPG-DTR is a superior reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10272833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102728332023-06-17 The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study Xu, Zhiwen Chen, Jinping Chen, Shaoqin Lin, Hexin Zhao, Kang Zheng, Changyue Liu, Huibin Chen, Zhihua Fu, Yongan Hong, Qingqi Lin, Wei Yan, Su You, Jun Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with tube-like stomach reconstruction (LPG-TLR) are both function-preserving procedures performed for treating AEG. However, there is no clinical consensus on the selection of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and the best way to reconstruct the digestive tract remains controversial. This study aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of LPG-DTR and LPG-TLR to provide some reference to the choice of AEG surgical modalities. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. we collected clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with consecutive cases diagnosed with AEG from January 2016 to June 2021 in five medical centers. According to the way of digestive tract reconstruction after tumor resection, patients who underwent LPG-DTR or LPG-TLR were included in the present study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline variables that might affect the study outcomes. The QOL of the patients was evaluated using the Visick grade. RESULTS: A total of 124 eligible consecutive cases were finally included. Patients in both groups were matched using the PSM method, and 55 patients from each group were included in the analysis after PSM. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the operation time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, days of postoperative abdominal drainage tube placement, postoperative hospitalization days, total hospitalization cost, the total number of lymph nodes cleared, and the number of positive lymph nodes (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of time to first flatus after surgery and postoperative soft food recovery time (P<0.05). For the nutritional status, the weight levels at 1 year after surgery was better in the LPG-DTR group than in the LPG-TLR group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Visick grade between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The anti-reflux effect and quality of life of LPG-DTR for AEG were comparable to those of LPG-TLR. Compared with LPG-TLR, LPG-DTR provide better nutrition status for patients with AEG. LPG-DTR is a superior reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10272833/ /pubmed/37333809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137836 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xu, Chen, Chen, Lin, Zhao, Zheng, Liu, Chen, Fu, Hong, Lin, Yan and You https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Xu, Zhiwen Chen, Jinping Chen, Shaoqin Lin, Hexin Zhao, Kang Zheng, Changyue Liu, Huibin Chen, Zhihua Fu, Yongan Hong, Qingqi Lin, Wei Yan, Su You, Jun The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study |
title | The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study |
title_full | The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study |
title_fullStr | The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study |
title_short | The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuzhiwen theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT chenjinping theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT chenshaoqin theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT linhexin theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT zhaokang theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT zhengchangyue theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT liuhuibin theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT chenzhihua theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT fuyongan theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT hongqingqi theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT linwei theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT yansu theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT youjun theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT xuzhiwen clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT chenjinping clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT chenshaoqin clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT linhexin clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT zhaokang clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT zhengchangyue clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT liuhuibin clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT chenzhihua clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT fuyongan clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT hongqingqi clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT linwei clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT yansu clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy AT youjun clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy |