Cargando…

The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with tube-like stomach reconstruction (LPG-TLR) are both function-preserving procedures performed for treating AEG. However, there is no clinical consensus on the selection of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Zhiwen, Chen, Jinping, Chen, Shaoqin, Lin, Hexin, Zhao, Kang, Zheng, Changyue, Liu, Huibin, Chen, Zhihua, Fu, Yongan, Hong, Qingqi, Lin, Wei, Yan, Su, You, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137836
_version_ 1785059585808138240
author Xu, Zhiwen
Chen, Jinping
Chen, Shaoqin
Lin, Hexin
Zhao, Kang
Zheng, Changyue
Liu, Huibin
Chen, Zhihua
Fu, Yongan
Hong, Qingqi
Lin, Wei
Yan, Su
You, Jun
author_facet Xu, Zhiwen
Chen, Jinping
Chen, Shaoqin
Lin, Hexin
Zhao, Kang
Zheng, Changyue
Liu, Huibin
Chen, Zhihua
Fu, Yongan
Hong, Qingqi
Lin, Wei
Yan, Su
You, Jun
author_sort Xu, Zhiwen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with tube-like stomach reconstruction (LPG-TLR) are both function-preserving procedures performed for treating AEG. However, there is no clinical consensus on the selection of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and the best way to reconstruct the digestive tract remains controversial. This study aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of LPG-DTR and LPG-TLR to provide some reference to the choice of AEG surgical modalities. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. we collected clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with consecutive cases diagnosed with AEG from January 2016 to June 2021 in five medical centers. According to the way of digestive tract reconstruction after tumor resection, patients who underwent LPG-DTR or LPG-TLR were included in the present study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline variables that might affect the study outcomes. The QOL of the patients was evaluated using the Visick grade. RESULTS: A total of 124 eligible consecutive cases were finally included. Patients in both groups were matched using the PSM method, and 55 patients from each group were included in the analysis after PSM. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the operation time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, days of postoperative abdominal drainage tube placement, postoperative hospitalization days, total hospitalization cost, the total number of lymph nodes cleared, and the number of positive lymph nodes (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of time to first flatus after surgery and postoperative soft food recovery time (P<0.05). For the nutritional status, the weight levels at 1 year after surgery was better in the LPG-DTR group than in the LPG-TLR group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Visick grade between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The anti-reflux effect and quality of life of LPG-DTR for AEG were comparable to those of LPG-TLR. Compared with LPG-TLR, LPG-DTR provide better nutrition status for patients with AEG. LPG-DTR is a superior reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10272833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102728332023-06-17 The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study Xu, Zhiwen Chen, Jinping Chen, Shaoqin Lin, Hexin Zhao, Kang Zheng, Changyue Liu, Huibin Chen, Zhihua Fu, Yongan Hong, Qingqi Lin, Wei Yan, Su You, Jun Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with tube-like stomach reconstruction (LPG-TLR) are both function-preserving procedures performed for treating AEG. However, there is no clinical consensus on the selection of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and the best way to reconstruct the digestive tract remains controversial. This study aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of LPG-DTR and LPG-TLR to provide some reference to the choice of AEG surgical modalities. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. we collected clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with consecutive cases diagnosed with AEG from January 2016 to June 2021 in five medical centers. According to the way of digestive tract reconstruction after tumor resection, patients who underwent LPG-DTR or LPG-TLR were included in the present study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline variables that might affect the study outcomes. The QOL of the patients was evaluated using the Visick grade. RESULTS: A total of 124 eligible consecutive cases were finally included. Patients in both groups were matched using the PSM method, and 55 patients from each group were included in the analysis after PSM. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the operation time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, days of postoperative abdominal drainage tube placement, postoperative hospitalization days, total hospitalization cost, the total number of lymph nodes cleared, and the number of positive lymph nodes (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of time to first flatus after surgery and postoperative soft food recovery time (P<0.05). For the nutritional status, the weight levels at 1 year after surgery was better in the LPG-DTR group than in the LPG-TLR group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Visick grade between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The anti-reflux effect and quality of life of LPG-DTR for AEG were comparable to those of LPG-TLR. Compared with LPG-TLR, LPG-DTR provide better nutrition status for patients with AEG. LPG-DTR is a superior reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10272833/ /pubmed/37333809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137836 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xu, Chen, Chen, Lin, Zhao, Zheng, Liu, Chen, Fu, Hong, Lin, Yan and You https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xu, Zhiwen
Chen, Jinping
Chen, Shaoqin
Lin, Hexin
Zhao, Kang
Zheng, Changyue
Liu, Huibin
Chen, Zhihua
Fu, Yongan
Hong, Qingqi
Lin, Wei
Yan, Su
You, Jun
The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
title The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
title_full The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
title_fullStr The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
title_short The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
title_sort clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137836
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzhiwen theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT chenjinping theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT chenshaoqin theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT linhexin theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT zhaokang theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT zhengchangyue theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT liuhuibin theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT chenzhihua theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT fuyongan theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT hongqingqi theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT linwei theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT yansu theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT youjun theclinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT xuzhiwen clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT chenjinping clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT chenshaoqin clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT linhexin clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT zhaokang clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT zhengchangyue clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT liuhuibin clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT chenzhihua clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT fuyongan clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT hongqingqi clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT linwei clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT yansu clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy
AT youjun clinicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomywithdoubletractreconstructionversustubelikestomachreconstructioninpatientswithadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionbasedonpropensityscorematchingamulticentercohortstudy