Cargando…
Does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter?
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of treatment on pregnancy outcomes among women who had fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a secondary-analysis of a randomized community non-inferiority trial of gestati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1155007 |
_version_ | 1785059655322435584 |
---|---|
author | Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh Farzadfar, Farshad Hosseinpanah, Farhad Rahmati, Maryam Firouzi, Faegheh Abedini, Mehrandokht Hadaegh, Farzad Valizadeh, Majid Torkestani, Farahnaz Khalili, Davood Solaymani-Dodaran, Masoud Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh Bakhshandeh, Marzieh Ostovar, Afshin Dovom, Marzieh Rostami Amiri, Mina Azizi, Fereidoun Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira |
author_facet | Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh Farzadfar, Farshad Hosseinpanah, Farhad Rahmati, Maryam Firouzi, Faegheh Abedini, Mehrandokht Hadaegh, Farzad Valizadeh, Majid Torkestani, Farahnaz Khalili, Davood Solaymani-Dodaran, Masoud Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh Bakhshandeh, Marzieh Ostovar, Afshin Dovom, Marzieh Rostami Amiri, Mina Azizi, Fereidoun Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira |
author_sort | Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of treatment on pregnancy outcomes among women who had fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a secondary-analysis of a randomized community non-inferiority trial of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening. All pregnant women with FPG values range 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation were included in the present study (n=3297) and classified to either the (i) intervention group who received treatment for GDM along with usual prenatal care (n=1,198), (ii) control group who received usual-prenatal-care (n=2,099). Macrosomia/large for gestational age (LGA) and primary cesarean-section (C-S) were considered as primary-outcomes. A modified-Poisson-regression for binary outcome data with a log link function and robust error variance was used to RR (95%CI) for the associations between GDM status and incidence of pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The mean maternal age and BMI of pregnant women in both study groups were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in the adjusted risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including macrosomia, primary C-S, preterm birth, hyperbilirubinemia, preeclampsia, NICU-admission, birth trauma, and LBW both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is found that treating women with first-trimester FPG values of 5.1-5.6 mmol/l could not improve adverse pregnancy outcomes including macrosomia, Primary C-S, Preterm birth, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, preeclampsia, NICU admission, Birth trauma and LBW. Therefore, extrapolating the FPG cut-off point of the second trimester to the first –which has been proposed by the IADPSG, might therefore not be appropriate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.irct.ir/trial/518, identifier IRCT138707081281N1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10273274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102732742023-06-17 Does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter? Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh Farzadfar, Farshad Hosseinpanah, Farhad Rahmati, Maryam Firouzi, Faegheh Abedini, Mehrandokht Hadaegh, Farzad Valizadeh, Majid Torkestani, Farahnaz Khalili, Davood Solaymani-Dodaran, Masoud Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh Bakhshandeh, Marzieh Ostovar, Afshin Dovom, Marzieh Rostami Amiri, Mina Azizi, Fereidoun Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of treatment on pregnancy outcomes among women who had fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a secondary-analysis of a randomized community non-inferiority trial of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening. All pregnant women with FPG values range 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation were included in the present study (n=3297) and classified to either the (i) intervention group who received treatment for GDM along with usual prenatal care (n=1,198), (ii) control group who received usual-prenatal-care (n=2,099). Macrosomia/large for gestational age (LGA) and primary cesarean-section (C-S) were considered as primary-outcomes. A modified-Poisson-regression for binary outcome data with a log link function and robust error variance was used to RR (95%CI) for the associations between GDM status and incidence of pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The mean maternal age and BMI of pregnant women in both study groups were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in the adjusted risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including macrosomia, primary C-S, preterm birth, hyperbilirubinemia, preeclampsia, NICU-admission, birth trauma, and LBW both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is found that treating women with first-trimester FPG values of 5.1-5.6 mmol/l could not improve adverse pregnancy outcomes including macrosomia, Primary C-S, Preterm birth, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, preeclampsia, NICU admission, Birth trauma and LBW. Therefore, extrapolating the FPG cut-off point of the second trimester to the first –which has been proposed by the IADPSG, might therefore not be appropriate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.irct.ir/trial/518, identifier IRCT138707081281N1. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10273274/ /pubmed/37334302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1155007 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ramezani Tehrani, Farzadfar, Hosseinpanah, Rahmati, Firouzi, Abedini, Hadaegh, Valizadeh, Torkestani, Khalili, Solaymani-Dodaran, Bidhendi-Yarandi, Bakhshandeh, Ostovar, Dovom, Amiri, Azizi and Behboudi-Gandevani https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh Farzadfar, Farshad Hosseinpanah, Farhad Rahmati, Maryam Firouzi, Faegheh Abedini, Mehrandokht Hadaegh, Farzad Valizadeh, Majid Torkestani, Farahnaz Khalili, Davood Solaymani-Dodaran, Masoud Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh Bakhshandeh, Marzieh Ostovar, Afshin Dovom, Marzieh Rostami Amiri, Mina Azizi, Fereidoun Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira Does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter? |
title | Does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter? |
title_full | Does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter? |
title_fullStr | Does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter? |
title_short | Does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter? |
title_sort | does fasting plasma glucose values 5.1-5.6 mmol/l in the first trimester of gestation a matter? |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1155007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramezanitehranifahimeh doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT farzadfarfarshad doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT hosseinpanahfarhad doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT rahmatimaryam doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT firouzifaegheh doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT abedinimehrandokht doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT hadaeghfarzad doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT valizadehmajid doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT torkestanifarahnaz doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT khalilidavood doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT solaymanidodaranmasoud doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT bidhendiyarandirazieh doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT bakhshandehmarzieh doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT ostovarafshin doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT dovommarziehrostami doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT amirimina doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT azizifereidoun doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter AT behboudigandevanisamira doesfastingplasmaglucosevalues5156mmollinthefirsttrimesterofgestationamatter |