Cargando…
Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data
On the basis of the kangaroo's pseudo‐biped locomotion and its upright position, it could be assumed that the kangaroo might be an interesting model for spine research and that it may serve as a reasonable surrogate model for biomechanical in vitro tests. The purpose of this in vitro study was...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13852 |
_version_ | 1785059663376547840 |
---|---|
author | Wilke, Hans‐Joachim Betz, Volker Michael Kienle, Annette |
author_facet | Wilke, Hans‐Joachim Betz, Volker Michael Kienle, Annette |
author_sort | Wilke, Hans‐Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | On the basis of the kangaroo's pseudo‐biped locomotion and its upright position, it could be assumed that the kangaroo might be an interesting model for spine research and that it may serve as a reasonable surrogate model for biomechanical in vitro tests. The purpose of this in vitro study was to provide biomechanical properties of the kangaroo spine and compare them with human spinal data from the literature. In addition, references to already published kangaroo anatomical spinal parameters will be discussed. Thirteen kangaroo spines from C4 to S4 were sectioned into single‐motion segments. The specimens were tested by a spine tester under pure moments. The range of motion and neutral zone of each segment were determined in flexion and extension, right and left lateral bending and left and right axial rotation. Overall, we found greater flexibility in the kangaroo spine compared to the human spine. Similarities were only found in the cervical, lower thoracic and lumbar spinal regions. The range of motion of the kangaroo and human spines displayed comparable trends in the cervical (C4–C7), lower thoracic and lumbar regions independent of the motion plane. In the upper and middle thoracic regions, the flexibility of the kangaroo spine was considerably larger. These results suggested that the kangaroo specimens could be considered to be a surrogate, but only in particular cases, for biomechanical in vitro tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10273331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102733312023-06-17 Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data Wilke, Hans‐Joachim Betz, Volker Michael Kienle, Annette J Anat Review Article On the basis of the kangaroo's pseudo‐biped locomotion and its upright position, it could be assumed that the kangaroo might be an interesting model for spine research and that it may serve as a reasonable surrogate model for biomechanical in vitro tests. The purpose of this in vitro study was to provide biomechanical properties of the kangaroo spine and compare them with human spinal data from the literature. In addition, references to already published kangaroo anatomical spinal parameters will be discussed. Thirteen kangaroo spines from C4 to S4 were sectioned into single‐motion segments. The specimens were tested by a spine tester under pure moments. The range of motion and neutral zone of each segment were determined in flexion and extension, right and left lateral bending and left and right axial rotation. Overall, we found greater flexibility in the kangaroo spine compared to the human spine. Similarities were only found in the cervical, lower thoracic and lumbar spinal regions. The range of motion of the kangaroo and human spines displayed comparable trends in the cervical (C4–C7), lower thoracic and lumbar regions independent of the motion plane. In the upper and middle thoracic regions, the flexibility of the kangaroo spine was considerably larger. These results suggested that the kangaroo specimens could be considered to be a surrogate, but only in particular cases, for biomechanical in vitro tests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10273331/ /pubmed/36929138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13852 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Wilke, Hans‐Joachim Betz, Volker Michael Kienle, Annette Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data |
title | Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data |
title_full | Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data |
title_short | Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data |
title_sort | biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilkehansjoachim biomechanicalinvitroevaluationofthekangaroospineincomparisonwithhumanspinaldata AT betzvolkermichael biomechanicalinvitroevaluationofthekangaroospineincomparisonwithhumanspinaldata AT kienleannette biomechanicalinvitroevaluationofthekangaroospineincomparisonwithhumanspinaldata |