Cargando…

The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers

BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the deliver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shoesmith, Emily, Gibsone, Selina, Ratschen, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36404624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac126
_version_ 1785059668577484800
author Shoesmith, Emily
Gibsone, Selina
Ratschen, Elena
author_facet Shoesmith, Emily
Gibsone, Selina
Ratschen, Elena
author_sort Shoesmith, Emily
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the delivery of AAIs, and associated challenges and opportunities. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted with UK AAI providers. The anonymized survey was distributed via academic and third sector networks and social media. Descriptive statistics and free-text responses are presented. RESULTS: Thirty-six AAI providers completed the survey. Of these, 83.3% continued to deliver AAIs during the pandemic. Twenty-eight delivered AAIs remotely and highlighted associated challenges, such as clients being unable to touch the animal, and clients having restricted access to the required technology. Over half reported their animal missed face-to-face interaction. However, they also reported advantages to remote delivery, such as for those who are allergic or fearful of animals. The most commonly reported challenges of in situ delivery included difficulty maintaining distance from the client and the use of face masks, which were perceived to hinder communication. CONCLUSION: The transition to remote delivery has highlighted challenges and opportunities. Further research could explore these in greater depth and compare the impact of different delivery modes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10273361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102733612023-06-17 The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers Shoesmith, Emily Gibsone, Selina Ratschen, Elena J Public Health (Oxf) Short Report BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the delivery of AAIs, and associated challenges and opportunities. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted with UK AAI providers. The anonymized survey was distributed via academic and third sector networks and social media. Descriptive statistics and free-text responses are presented. RESULTS: Thirty-six AAI providers completed the survey. Of these, 83.3% continued to deliver AAIs during the pandemic. Twenty-eight delivered AAIs remotely and highlighted associated challenges, such as clients being unable to touch the animal, and clients having restricted access to the required technology. Over half reported their animal missed face-to-face interaction. However, they also reported advantages to remote delivery, such as for those who are allergic or fearful of animals. The most commonly reported challenges of in situ delivery included difficulty maintaining distance from the client and the use of face masks, which were perceived to hinder communication. CONCLUSION: The transition to remote delivery has highlighted challenges and opportunities. Further research could explore these in greater depth and compare the impact of different delivery modes. Oxford University Press 2022-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10273361/ /pubmed/36404624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac126 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Shoesmith, Emily
Gibsone, Selina
Ratschen, Elena
The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers
title The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers
title_full The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers
title_fullStr The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers
title_full_unstemmed The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers
title_short The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers
title_sort impact of covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of uk animal-assisted intervention providers
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36404624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac126
work_keys_str_mv AT shoesmithemily theimpactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders
AT gibsoneselina theimpactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders
AT ratschenelena theimpactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders
AT shoesmithemily impactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders
AT gibsoneselina impactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders
AT ratschenelena impactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders