Cargando…
The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers
BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the deliver...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36404624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac126 |
_version_ | 1785059668577484800 |
---|---|
author | Shoesmith, Emily Gibsone, Selina Ratschen, Elena |
author_facet | Shoesmith, Emily Gibsone, Selina Ratschen, Elena |
author_sort | Shoesmith, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the delivery of AAIs, and associated challenges and opportunities. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted with UK AAI providers. The anonymized survey was distributed via academic and third sector networks and social media. Descriptive statistics and free-text responses are presented. RESULTS: Thirty-six AAI providers completed the survey. Of these, 83.3% continued to deliver AAIs during the pandemic. Twenty-eight delivered AAIs remotely and highlighted associated challenges, such as clients being unable to touch the animal, and clients having restricted access to the required technology. Over half reported their animal missed face-to-face interaction. However, they also reported advantages to remote delivery, such as for those who are allergic or fearful of animals. The most commonly reported challenges of in situ delivery included difficulty maintaining distance from the client and the use of face masks, which were perceived to hinder communication. CONCLUSION: The transition to remote delivery has highlighted challenges and opportunities. Further research could explore these in greater depth and compare the impact of different delivery modes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10273361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102733612023-06-17 The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers Shoesmith, Emily Gibsone, Selina Ratschen, Elena J Public Health (Oxf) Short Report BACKGROUND: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the delivery of AAIs, and associated challenges and opportunities. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted with UK AAI providers. The anonymized survey was distributed via academic and third sector networks and social media. Descriptive statistics and free-text responses are presented. RESULTS: Thirty-six AAI providers completed the survey. Of these, 83.3% continued to deliver AAIs during the pandemic. Twenty-eight delivered AAIs remotely and highlighted associated challenges, such as clients being unable to touch the animal, and clients having restricted access to the required technology. Over half reported their animal missed face-to-face interaction. However, they also reported advantages to remote delivery, such as for those who are allergic or fearful of animals. The most commonly reported challenges of in situ delivery included difficulty maintaining distance from the client and the use of face masks, which were perceived to hinder communication. CONCLUSION: The transition to remote delivery has highlighted challenges and opportunities. Further research could explore these in greater depth and compare the impact of different delivery modes. Oxford University Press 2022-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10273361/ /pubmed/36404624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac126 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Shoesmith, Emily Gibsone, Selina Ratschen, Elena The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers |
title | The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers |
title_full | The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers |
title_fullStr | The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers |
title_short | The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers |
title_sort | impact of covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of uk animal-assisted intervention providers |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36404624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdac126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shoesmithemily theimpactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders AT gibsoneselina theimpactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders AT ratschenelena theimpactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders AT shoesmithemily impactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders AT gibsoneselina impactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders AT ratschenelena impactofcovid19onanimalassistedinterventionsperceptionsofukanimalassistedinterventionproviders |