Cargando…
A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)
BACKGROUND: According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6 |
_version_ | 1785059699293421568 |
---|---|
author | Rasmussen, Louise Skau Winther, Stine B. Chen, Inna M. Weber, Britta Ventzel, Lise Liposits, Gabor Johansen, Julia Sidenius Detlefsen, Sönke Egendal, Ida Shim, Susy Christensen, Signe Pfeiffer, Per Ladekarl, Morten |
author_facet | Rasmussen, Louise Skau Winther, Stine B. Chen, Inna M. Weber, Britta Ventzel, Lise Liposits, Gabor Johansen, Julia Sidenius Detlefsen, Sönke Egendal, Ida Shim, Susy Christensen, Signe Pfeiffer, Per Ladekarl, Morten |
author_sort | Rasmussen, Louise Skau |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) in PC suggest, however, that reduced dose of combination chemotherapy may be feasible and more efficient compared to monotherapy in frail patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether reduced dose GemNab is superior to full dose Gem in patients with resectable PC, who are not candidates for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line. METHODS: The Danish Pancreas Cancer Group (DPCG)-01 trial is a national multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial. A total of 100 patients in ECOG performance status 0–2 with non-resectable PC, not candidate for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line, but eligible for full dose Gem, will be included. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either full dose Gem or GemNab in 80% of recommended dose. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, quality of life, toxicity and rate of hospitalizations during treatment. The correlation between blood inflammatory markers, including YKL-40 and IL-6, circulating tumor DNA, and tissue biomarkers of resistance to chemotherapy and outcome will be explored. Finally, the study will include measures of frailty (G8, modified G8, and chair-stand-test) to assess whether scoring would enable a personalized allocation to different treatments or indicates a possibility for interventions. DISCUSSION: Single-drug treatment with Gem has for frail patients with non-resectable PC been the main treatment option for more than thirty years, but the impact on outcome is modest. If improved results and sustained tolerability with reduced dose combination chemotherapy can be shown, this could change the future practice for this increasing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05841420. Secondary Identifying No: N-20210068. EudraCT No: 2021–005067-52. Protocol version: 1.5, 16-MAY-2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10273702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102737022023-06-17 A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01) Rasmussen, Louise Skau Winther, Stine B. Chen, Inna M. Weber, Britta Ventzel, Lise Liposits, Gabor Johansen, Julia Sidenius Detlefsen, Sönke Egendal, Ida Shim, Susy Christensen, Signe Pfeiffer, Per Ladekarl, Morten BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) in PC suggest, however, that reduced dose of combination chemotherapy may be feasible and more efficient compared to monotherapy in frail patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether reduced dose GemNab is superior to full dose Gem in patients with resectable PC, who are not candidates for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line. METHODS: The Danish Pancreas Cancer Group (DPCG)-01 trial is a national multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial. A total of 100 patients in ECOG performance status 0–2 with non-resectable PC, not candidate for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line, but eligible for full dose Gem, will be included. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either full dose Gem or GemNab in 80% of recommended dose. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, quality of life, toxicity and rate of hospitalizations during treatment. The correlation between blood inflammatory markers, including YKL-40 and IL-6, circulating tumor DNA, and tissue biomarkers of resistance to chemotherapy and outcome will be explored. Finally, the study will include measures of frailty (G8, modified G8, and chair-stand-test) to assess whether scoring would enable a personalized allocation to different treatments or indicates a possibility for interventions. DISCUSSION: Single-drug treatment with Gem has for frail patients with non-resectable PC been the main treatment option for more than thirty years, but the impact on outcome is modest. If improved results and sustained tolerability with reduced dose combination chemotherapy can be shown, this could change the future practice for this increasing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05841420. Secondary Identifying No: N-20210068. EudraCT No: 2021–005067-52. Protocol version: 1.5, 16-MAY-2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6. BioMed Central 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10273702/ /pubmed/37328835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Rasmussen, Louise Skau Winther, Stine B. Chen, Inna M. Weber, Britta Ventzel, Lise Liposits, Gabor Johansen, Julia Sidenius Detlefsen, Sönke Egendal, Ida Shim, Susy Christensen, Signe Pfeiffer, Per Ladekarl, Morten A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01) |
title | A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01) |
title_full | A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01) |
title_fullStr | A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01) |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01) |
title_short | A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01) |
title_sort | randomized phase ii study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (dpcg-01) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rasmussenlouiseskau arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT wintherstineb arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT cheninnam arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT weberbritta arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT ventzellise arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT lipositsgabor arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT johansenjuliasidenius arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT detlefsensonke arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT egendalida arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT shimsusy arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT christensensigne arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT pfeifferper arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT ladekarlmorten arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT rasmussenlouiseskau randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT wintherstineb randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT cheninnam randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT weberbritta randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT ventzellise randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT lipositsgabor randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT johansenjuliasidenius randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT detlefsensonke randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT egendalida randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT shimsusy randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT christensensigne randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT pfeifferper randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 AT ladekarlmorten randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01 |