Cargando…

A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)

BACKGROUND: According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Louise Skau, Winther, Stine B., Chen, Inna M., Weber, Britta, Ventzel, Lise, Liposits, Gabor, Johansen, Julia Sidenius, Detlefsen, Sönke, Egendal, Ida, Shim, Susy, Christensen, Signe, Pfeiffer, Per, Ladekarl, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6
_version_ 1785059699293421568
author Rasmussen, Louise Skau
Winther, Stine B.
Chen, Inna M.
Weber, Britta
Ventzel, Lise
Liposits, Gabor
Johansen, Julia Sidenius
Detlefsen, Sönke
Egendal, Ida
Shim, Susy
Christensen, Signe
Pfeiffer, Per
Ladekarl, Morten
author_facet Rasmussen, Louise Skau
Winther, Stine B.
Chen, Inna M.
Weber, Britta
Ventzel, Lise
Liposits, Gabor
Johansen, Julia Sidenius
Detlefsen, Sönke
Egendal, Ida
Shim, Susy
Christensen, Signe
Pfeiffer, Per
Ladekarl, Morten
author_sort Rasmussen, Louise Skau
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) in PC suggest, however, that reduced dose of combination chemotherapy may be feasible and more efficient compared to monotherapy in frail patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether reduced dose GemNab is superior to full dose Gem in patients with resectable PC, who are not candidates for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line. METHODS: The Danish Pancreas Cancer Group (DPCG)-01 trial is a national multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial. A total of 100 patients in ECOG performance status 0–2 with non-resectable PC, not candidate for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line, but eligible for full dose Gem, will be included. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either full dose Gem or GemNab in 80% of recommended dose. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, quality of life, toxicity and rate of hospitalizations during treatment. The correlation between blood inflammatory markers, including YKL-40 and IL-6, circulating tumor DNA, and tissue biomarkers of resistance to chemotherapy and outcome will be explored. Finally, the study will include measures of frailty (G8, modified G8, and chair-stand-test) to assess whether scoring would enable a personalized allocation to different treatments or indicates a possibility for interventions. DISCUSSION: Single-drug treatment with Gem has for frail patients with non-resectable PC been the main treatment option for more than thirty years, but the impact on outcome is modest. If improved results and sustained tolerability with reduced dose combination chemotherapy can be shown, this could change the future practice for this increasing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05841420. Secondary Identifying No: N-20210068. EudraCT No: 2021–005067-52. Protocol version: 1.5, 16-MAY-2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10273702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102737022023-06-17 A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01) Rasmussen, Louise Skau Winther, Stine B. Chen, Inna M. Weber, Britta Ventzel, Lise Liposits, Gabor Johansen, Julia Sidenius Detlefsen, Sönke Egendal, Ida Shim, Susy Christensen, Signe Pfeiffer, Per Ladekarl, Morten BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: According to current evidence, the best treatment for fit patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas frail patients are recommended gemcitabine (Gem) monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNab) in PC suggest, however, that reduced dose of combination chemotherapy may be feasible and more efficient compared to monotherapy in frail patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether reduced dose GemNab is superior to full dose Gem in patients with resectable PC, who are not candidates for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line. METHODS: The Danish Pancreas Cancer Group (DPCG)-01 trial is a national multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial. A total of 100 patients in ECOG performance status 0–2 with non-resectable PC, not candidate for full dose combination chemotherapy in first line, but eligible for full dose Gem, will be included. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either full dose Gem or GemNab in 80% of recommended dose. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, quality of life, toxicity and rate of hospitalizations during treatment. The correlation between blood inflammatory markers, including YKL-40 and IL-6, circulating tumor DNA, and tissue biomarkers of resistance to chemotherapy and outcome will be explored. Finally, the study will include measures of frailty (G8, modified G8, and chair-stand-test) to assess whether scoring would enable a personalized allocation to different treatments or indicates a possibility for interventions. DISCUSSION: Single-drug treatment with Gem has for frail patients with non-resectable PC been the main treatment option for more than thirty years, but the impact on outcome is modest. If improved results and sustained tolerability with reduced dose combination chemotherapy can be shown, this could change the future practice for this increasing group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05841420. Secondary Identifying No: N-20210068. EudraCT No: 2021–005067-52. Protocol version: 1.5, 16-MAY-2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6. BioMed Central 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10273702/ /pubmed/37328835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rasmussen, Louise Skau
Winther, Stine B.
Chen, Inna M.
Weber, Britta
Ventzel, Lise
Liposits, Gabor
Johansen, Julia Sidenius
Detlefsen, Sönke
Egendal, Ida
Shim, Susy
Christensen, Signe
Pfeiffer, Per
Ladekarl, Morten
A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)
title A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)
title_full A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)
title_fullStr A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)
title_full_unstemmed A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)
title_short A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01)
title_sort randomized phase ii study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (dpcg-01)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussenlouiseskau arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT wintherstineb arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT cheninnam arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT weberbritta arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT ventzellise arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT lipositsgabor arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT johansenjuliasidenius arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT detlefsensonke arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT egendalida arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT shimsusy arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT christensensigne arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT pfeifferper arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT ladekarlmorten arandomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT rasmussenlouiseskau randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT wintherstineb randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT cheninnam randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT weberbritta randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT ventzellise randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT lipositsgabor randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT johansenjuliasidenius randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT detlefsensonke randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT egendalida randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT shimsusy randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT christensensigne randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT pfeifferper randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01
AT ladekarlmorten randomizedphaseiistudyoffulldosegemcitabineversusreduceddosegemcitabineandnabpaclitaxelinvulnerablepatientswithnonresectablepancreaticcancerdpcg01