Cargando…

The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis

BACKGROUND: To quantitatively synthesize evidence from prospective observational studies regarding the mean levels of circulating adiponectin in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the association between adiponectin levels and GDM risk. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Shen, Su, Shaofei, Zhang, Enjie, Zhang, Yue, Liu, Jianhui, Xie, Shuanghua, Yue, Wentao, Liu, Ruixia, Yin, Chenghong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10274561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2224046
_version_ 1785059761451958272
author Gao, Shen
Su, Shaofei
Zhang, Enjie
Zhang, Yue
Liu, Jianhui
Xie, Shuanghua
Yue, Wentao
Liu, Ruixia
Yin, Chenghong
author_facet Gao, Shen
Su, Shaofei
Zhang, Enjie
Zhang, Yue
Liu, Jianhui
Xie, Shuanghua
Yue, Wentao
Liu, Ruixia
Yin, Chenghong
author_sort Gao, Shen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To quantitatively synthesize evidence from prospective observational studies regarding the mean levels of circulating adiponectin in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the association between adiponectin levels and GDM risk. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from their inception until November 8th, 2022, for nested case-control studies and cohort studies. Random-effect models were applied to the synthesized effect sizes. The difference in circulating adiponectin levels between the GDM and control groups was measured using the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The relationship between circulating adiponectin levels and GDM risk was examined using the combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study continent, GDM risk in the study population, study design, gestational weeks of circulating adiponectin detection, GDM diagnostic criteria, and study quality. Sensitivity and cumulative analyses were performed to evaluate the stability of the meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger’s test. RESULTS: The 28 studies included 13 cohort studies and 15 nested case-control studies, containing 12,256 pregnant women in total. The mean adiponectin level in GDM patients was significantly lower than in controls (SMD = −1.514, 95% CI = −2.400 to −0.628, p = .001, I(2) = 99%). The risk of GDM was significantly decreased among pregnant women with increasing levels of circulating adiponectin (OR = 0.368, 95% CI = 0.271–0.500, p < .001, I(2)=83%). There were no significant differences between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that increasing circulating adiponectin levels were inversely associated with the risk of GDM. Given the inherent heterogeneity and publication bias of the included studies, further well-designed large-scale prospective cohort or intervention studies are needed to confirm our finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10274561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102745612023-06-17 The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis Gao, Shen Su, Shaofei Zhang, Enjie Zhang, Yue Liu, Jianhui Xie, Shuanghua Yue, Wentao Liu, Ruixia Yin, Chenghong Ann Med Pregnancy, Childbirth & Women's Health BACKGROUND: To quantitatively synthesize evidence from prospective observational studies regarding the mean levels of circulating adiponectin in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the association between adiponectin levels and GDM risk. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from their inception until November 8th, 2022, for nested case-control studies and cohort studies. Random-effect models were applied to the synthesized effect sizes. The difference in circulating adiponectin levels between the GDM and control groups was measured using the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The relationship between circulating adiponectin levels and GDM risk was examined using the combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study continent, GDM risk in the study population, study design, gestational weeks of circulating adiponectin detection, GDM diagnostic criteria, and study quality. Sensitivity and cumulative analyses were performed to evaluate the stability of the meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger’s test. RESULTS: The 28 studies included 13 cohort studies and 15 nested case-control studies, containing 12,256 pregnant women in total. The mean adiponectin level in GDM patients was significantly lower than in controls (SMD = −1.514, 95% CI = −2.400 to −0.628, p = .001, I(2) = 99%). The risk of GDM was significantly decreased among pregnant women with increasing levels of circulating adiponectin (OR = 0.368, 95% CI = 0.271–0.500, p < .001, I(2)=83%). There were no significant differences between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that increasing circulating adiponectin levels were inversely associated with the risk of GDM. Given the inherent heterogeneity and publication bias of the included studies, further well-designed large-scale prospective cohort or intervention studies are needed to confirm our finding. Taylor & Francis 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10274561/ /pubmed/37318118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2224046 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Pregnancy, Childbirth & Women's Health
Gao, Shen
Su, Shaofei
Zhang, Enjie
Zhang, Yue
Liu, Jianhui
Xie, Shuanghua
Yue, Wentao
Liu, Ruixia
Yin, Chenghong
The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis
title The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis
title_full The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis
title_fullStr The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis
title_short The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis
title_sort effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis
topic Pregnancy, Childbirth & Women's Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10274561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2224046
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoshen theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sushaofei theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangenjie theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyue theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujianhui theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xieshuanghua theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuewentao theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuruixia theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinchenghong theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaoshen effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sushaofei effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangenjie effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyue effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujianhui effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xieshuanghua effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuewentao effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuruixia effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinchenghong effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis