Cargando…
The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis
BACKGROUND: To quantitatively synthesize evidence from prospective observational studies regarding the mean levels of circulating adiponectin in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the association between adiponectin levels and GDM risk. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10274561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2224046 |
_version_ | 1785059761451958272 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Shen Su, Shaofei Zhang, Enjie Zhang, Yue Liu, Jianhui Xie, Shuanghua Yue, Wentao Liu, Ruixia Yin, Chenghong |
author_facet | Gao, Shen Su, Shaofei Zhang, Enjie Zhang, Yue Liu, Jianhui Xie, Shuanghua Yue, Wentao Liu, Ruixia Yin, Chenghong |
author_sort | Gao, Shen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To quantitatively synthesize evidence from prospective observational studies regarding the mean levels of circulating adiponectin in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the association between adiponectin levels and GDM risk. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from their inception until November 8th, 2022, for nested case-control studies and cohort studies. Random-effect models were applied to the synthesized effect sizes. The difference in circulating adiponectin levels between the GDM and control groups was measured using the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The relationship between circulating adiponectin levels and GDM risk was examined using the combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study continent, GDM risk in the study population, study design, gestational weeks of circulating adiponectin detection, GDM diagnostic criteria, and study quality. Sensitivity and cumulative analyses were performed to evaluate the stability of the meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger’s test. RESULTS: The 28 studies included 13 cohort studies and 15 nested case-control studies, containing 12,256 pregnant women in total. The mean adiponectin level in GDM patients was significantly lower than in controls (SMD = −1.514, 95% CI = −2.400 to −0.628, p = .001, I(2) = 99%). The risk of GDM was significantly decreased among pregnant women with increasing levels of circulating adiponectin (OR = 0.368, 95% CI = 0.271–0.500, p < .001, I(2)=83%). There were no significant differences between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that increasing circulating adiponectin levels were inversely associated with the risk of GDM. Given the inherent heterogeneity and publication bias of the included studies, further well-designed large-scale prospective cohort or intervention studies are needed to confirm our finding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10274561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102745612023-06-17 The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis Gao, Shen Su, Shaofei Zhang, Enjie Zhang, Yue Liu, Jianhui Xie, Shuanghua Yue, Wentao Liu, Ruixia Yin, Chenghong Ann Med Pregnancy, Childbirth & Women's Health BACKGROUND: To quantitatively synthesize evidence from prospective observational studies regarding the mean levels of circulating adiponectin in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the association between adiponectin levels and GDM risk. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from their inception until November 8th, 2022, for nested case-control studies and cohort studies. Random-effect models were applied to the synthesized effect sizes. The difference in circulating adiponectin levels between the GDM and control groups was measured using the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The relationship between circulating adiponectin levels and GDM risk was examined using the combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the study continent, GDM risk in the study population, study design, gestational weeks of circulating adiponectin detection, GDM diagnostic criteria, and study quality. Sensitivity and cumulative analyses were performed to evaluate the stability of the meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger’s test. RESULTS: The 28 studies included 13 cohort studies and 15 nested case-control studies, containing 12,256 pregnant women in total. The mean adiponectin level in GDM patients was significantly lower than in controls (SMD = −1.514, 95% CI = −2.400 to −0.628, p = .001, I(2) = 99%). The risk of GDM was significantly decreased among pregnant women with increasing levels of circulating adiponectin (OR = 0.368, 95% CI = 0.271–0.500, p < .001, I(2)=83%). There were no significant differences between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that increasing circulating adiponectin levels were inversely associated with the risk of GDM. Given the inherent heterogeneity and publication bias of the included studies, further well-designed large-scale prospective cohort or intervention studies are needed to confirm our finding. Taylor & Francis 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10274561/ /pubmed/37318118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2224046 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Pregnancy, Childbirth & Women's Health Gao, Shen Su, Shaofei Zhang, Enjie Zhang, Yue Liu, Jianhui Xie, Shuanghua Yue, Wentao Liu, Ruixia Yin, Chenghong The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis |
title | The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis |
title_full | The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis |
title_fullStr | The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis |
title_short | The effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis |
title_sort | effect of circulating adiponectin levels on incident gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta‑analysis |
topic | Pregnancy, Childbirth & Women's Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10274561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2224046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaoshen theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sushaofei theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangenjie theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangyue theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liujianhui theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xieshuanghua theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuewentao theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuruixia theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yinchenghong theeffectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gaoshen effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sushaofei effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangenjie effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangyue effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liujianhui effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xieshuanghua effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuewentao effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuruixia effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yinchenghong effectofcirculatingadiponectinlevelsonincidentgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |