Cargando…
Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
INTRODUCTION: Client-accessible interdisciplinary health records potentially contribute to integrated care by facilitating collaboration and enhancing clients’ involvement in care. To achieve this, three Dutch organizations providing ‘care for youth’ developed a fully client-accessible electronic pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333776 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6905 |
_version_ | 1785059837578575872 |
---|---|
author | Benjamins, Janine Duinkerken, Jan-Gerrit den Hamer-Jordaan, Gerlinde Canfijn, Romay Koster, Rianne de Vet, Emely Haveman-Nies, Annemien |
author_facet | Benjamins, Janine Duinkerken, Jan-Gerrit den Hamer-Jordaan, Gerlinde Canfijn, Romay Koster, Rianne de Vet, Emely Haveman-Nies, Annemien |
author_sort | Benjamins, Janine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Client-accessible interdisciplinary health records potentially contribute to integrated care by facilitating collaboration and enhancing clients’ involvement in care. To achieve this, three Dutch organizations providing ‘care for youth’ developed a fully client-accessible electronic patient record (EPR-Youth). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of EPR-Youth and to determine barriers and facilitators. METHODS: A mixed methods design combined system data, process observations, questionnaires and focus group interviews. Target groups were parents, adolescents, professionals using EPR-Youth, and implementation stakeholders. FINDINGS: Client-portal acceptability was high among all clients. Client-portal adoption rate was high and differed between age groups and educational levels. Professionals’ doubts about acceptability, appropriateness and fidelity were partly due to lack of system knowledge. Implementation barriers were the complexity of co-creation, lack of clear leadership, and concerns about legal issues. Facilitators were clarifying vision and legal context, setting deadlines, and a pioneering spirit. CONCLUSION: The early implementation of EPR-Youth, the first Dutch client-accessible interdisciplinary electronic health record in ‘care for youth’ was successful. To enhance adoption among clients, group-specific barriers for portal-use should be determined. Professionals need additional training. Further research is needed to gain insight into client-portal access barriers. To benefit more from co-creation, an organizational change towards situational leadership is necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10275189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102751892023-06-17 Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation Benjamins, Janine Duinkerken, Jan-Gerrit den Hamer-Jordaan, Gerlinde Canfijn, Romay Koster, Rianne de Vet, Emely Haveman-Nies, Annemien Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: Client-accessible interdisciplinary health records potentially contribute to integrated care by facilitating collaboration and enhancing clients’ involvement in care. To achieve this, three Dutch organizations providing ‘care for youth’ developed a fully client-accessible electronic patient record (EPR-Youth). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of EPR-Youth and to determine barriers and facilitators. METHODS: A mixed methods design combined system data, process observations, questionnaires and focus group interviews. Target groups were parents, adolescents, professionals using EPR-Youth, and implementation stakeholders. FINDINGS: Client-portal acceptability was high among all clients. Client-portal adoption rate was high and differed between age groups and educational levels. Professionals’ doubts about acceptability, appropriateness and fidelity were partly due to lack of system knowledge. Implementation barriers were the complexity of co-creation, lack of clear leadership, and concerns about legal issues. Facilitators were clarifying vision and legal context, setting deadlines, and a pioneering spirit. CONCLUSION: The early implementation of EPR-Youth, the first Dutch client-accessible interdisciplinary electronic health record in ‘care for youth’ was successful. To enhance adoption among clients, group-specific barriers for portal-use should be determined. Professionals need additional training. Further research is needed to gain insight into client-portal access barriers. To benefit more from co-creation, an organizational change towards situational leadership is necessary. Ubiquity Press 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10275189/ /pubmed/37333776 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6905 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research and Theory Benjamins, Janine Duinkerken, Jan-Gerrit den Hamer-Jordaan, Gerlinde Canfijn, Romay Koster, Rianne de Vet, Emely Haveman-Nies, Annemien Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title | Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_full | Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_short | Implementation of EPR-Youth, a Client-Accessible and Multidisciplinary Health Record; A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation |
title_sort | implementation of epr-youth, a client-accessible and multidisciplinary health record; a mixed-methods process evaluation |
topic | Research and Theory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37333776 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminsjanine implementationofepryouthaclientaccessibleandmultidisciplinaryhealthrecordamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT duinkerkenjangerrit implementationofepryouthaclientaccessibleandmultidisciplinaryhealthrecordamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT denhamerjordaangerlinde implementationofepryouthaclientaccessibleandmultidisciplinaryhealthrecordamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT canfijnromay implementationofepryouthaclientaccessibleandmultidisciplinaryhealthrecordamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT kosterrianne implementationofepryouthaclientaccessibleandmultidisciplinaryhealthrecordamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT devetemely implementationofepryouthaclientaccessibleandmultidisciplinaryhealthrecordamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT havemanniesannemien implementationofepryouthaclientaccessibleandmultidisciplinaryhealthrecordamixedmethodsprocessevaluation |