Cargando…

Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments(☆)

OBJECTIVES: Since 1972, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) commissioned several research programs on remote viewing (RV) that were progressively declassified from 1995 to 2003. The main objectives of this research were to statistically replicate the original findings and address the question...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escolà‐Gascón, Álex, Houran, James, Dagnall, Neil, Drinkwater, Kenneth, Denovan, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37133806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3026
_version_ 1785059888557195264
author Escolà‐Gascón, Álex
Houran, James
Dagnall, Neil
Drinkwater, Kenneth
Denovan, Andrew
author_facet Escolà‐Gascón, Álex
Houran, James
Dagnall, Neil
Drinkwater, Kenneth
Denovan, Andrew
author_sort Escolà‐Gascón, Álex
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Since 1972, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) commissioned several research programs on remote viewing (RV) that were progressively declassified from 1995 to 2003. The main objectives of this research were to statistically replicate the original findings and address the question: What are the underlying cognitive mechanisms involved in RV? The research focused on emotional intelligence (EI) theory and intuitive information processing as possible hypothetical mechanisms. METHODS: We used a quasi‐experimental design with new statistical control techniques based on structural equation modeling, analysis of invariance, and forced‐choice experiments to accurately objectify results. We measured emotional intelligence with the Mayer—Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. A total of 347 participants who were nonbelievers in psychic experiences completed an RV experiment using targets based on location coordinates. A total of 287 participants reported beliefs in psychic experiences and completed another RV experiment using targets based on images of places. Moreover, we divided the total sample into further subsamples for the purpose of replicating the findings and also used different thresholds on standard deviations to test for variation in effect sizes. The hit rates on the psi‐RV task were contrasted with the estimated chance. RESULTS: The results of our first group analysis were nonsignificant, but the analysis applied to the second group produced significant RV‐related effects corresponding to the positive influence of EI (i.e., hits in the RV experiments were 19.5% predicted from EI) with small to moderate effect sizes (between 0. 457 and 0.853). CONCLUSIONS: These findings have profound implications for a new hypothesis of anomalous cognitions relative to RV protocols. Emotions perceived during RV sessions may play an important role in the production of anomalous cognitions. We propose the Production‐Identification‐Comprehension (PIC) emotional model as a function of behavior that could enhance VR test success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10275521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102755212023-06-17 Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments(☆) Escolà‐Gascón, Álex Houran, James Dagnall, Neil Drinkwater, Kenneth Denovan, Andrew Brain Behav Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Since 1972, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) commissioned several research programs on remote viewing (RV) that were progressively declassified from 1995 to 2003. The main objectives of this research were to statistically replicate the original findings and address the question: What are the underlying cognitive mechanisms involved in RV? The research focused on emotional intelligence (EI) theory and intuitive information processing as possible hypothetical mechanisms. METHODS: We used a quasi‐experimental design with new statistical control techniques based on structural equation modeling, analysis of invariance, and forced‐choice experiments to accurately objectify results. We measured emotional intelligence with the Mayer—Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. A total of 347 participants who were nonbelievers in psychic experiences completed an RV experiment using targets based on location coordinates. A total of 287 participants reported beliefs in psychic experiences and completed another RV experiment using targets based on images of places. Moreover, we divided the total sample into further subsamples for the purpose of replicating the findings and also used different thresholds on standard deviations to test for variation in effect sizes. The hit rates on the psi‐RV task were contrasted with the estimated chance. RESULTS: The results of our first group analysis were nonsignificant, but the analysis applied to the second group produced significant RV‐related effects corresponding to the positive influence of EI (i.e., hits in the RV experiments were 19.5% predicted from EI) with small to moderate effect sizes (between 0. 457 and 0.853). CONCLUSIONS: These findings have profound implications for a new hypothesis of anomalous cognitions relative to RV protocols. Emotions perceived during RV sessions may play an important role in the production of anomalous cognitions. We propose the Production‐Identification‐Comprehension (PIC) emotional model as a function of behavior that could enhance VR test success. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10275521/ /pubmed/37133806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3026 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Escolà‐Gascón, Álex
Houran, James
Dagnall, Neil
Drinkwater, Kenneth
Denovan, Andrew
Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments(☆)
title Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments(☆)
title_full Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments(☆)
title_fullStr Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments(☆)
title_full_unstemmed Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments(☆)
title_short Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments(☆)
title_sort follow‐up on the u.s. central intelligence agency's (cia) remote viewing experiments(☆)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37133806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3026
work_keys_str_mv AT escolagasconalex followupontheuscentralintelligenceagencysciaremoteviewingexperiments
AT houranjames followupontheuscentralintelligenceagencysciaremoteviewingexperiments
AT dagnallneil followupontheuscentralintelligenceagencysciaremoteviewingexperiments
AT drinkwaterkenneth followupontheuscentralintelligenceagencysciaremoteviewingexperiments
AT denovanandrew followupontheuscentralintelligenceagencysciaremoteviewingexperiments