Cargando…

Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair in patients with isolated subscapularis tendon tears. METHODS: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating isolated subscapularis tears subsequently treated by ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rinaldi, Vito Gaetano, La Verde, Matteo, Coliva, Federico, Cammisa, Eugenio, Lullini, Giada, Caravelli, Silvio, Mosca, Massimiliano, Zaffagnini, Stefano, Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37004531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07403-1
_version_ 1785059947937005568
author Rinaldi, Vito Gaetano
La Verde, Matteo
Coliva, Federico
Cammisa, Eugenio
Lullini, Giada
Caravelli, Silvio
Mosca, Massimiliano
Zaffagnini, Stefano
Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria
author_facet Rinaldi, Vito Gaetano
La Verde, Matteo
Coliva, Federico
Cammisa, Eugenio
Lullini, Giada
Caravelli, Silvio
Mosca, Massimiliano
Zaffagnini, Stefano
Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria
author_sort Rinaldi, Vito Gaetano
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair in patients with isolated subscapularis tendon tears. METHODS: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating isolated subscapularis tears subsequently treated by arthroscopic or mini-open repair. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies reporting isolated subscapularis lesions treated by arthroscopic or mini-open repair, a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and clinical and functional outcomes reported in the study results. Articles not reporting functional outcomes or studies that reported results for anterosuperior rotator cuff tears without a separate analysis of subscapularis tendon tears were excluded. Studies older than 20 years and studies with a minimum follow-up of less than 12 months were also excluded. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria; 8 papers were included in the arthroscopic repair group, and 6 were included in the mini-open repair group (2 studies reported results for both techniques). The mean age reported was 49.3 years, and 85.1% of patients were male. The dominant limb was involved in 77.6% of the patients, and a traumatic onset of symptoms was verified in 76.3%. The mean time to surgery was 9.6 months. The Constant–Murley score showed positive results for the arthroscopic and mini-open groups, with mean postoperative values of 84.6 and 82.1, respectively. Promising results were also observed for pain, with a mean of 13.2 (out of 15) points for the arthroscopic group and 11.7 for the mini-open group. The long head of the biceps was involved in 78% of the patients, and LHB tenodesis or tenotomy were the most common concomitant procedures performed. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in clinical and functional outcomes between open and arthroscopic repair. Moreover, the same complication rates were reported in both treatments, but arthroscopic repair led to less postoperative pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10275809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102758092023-06-18 Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review Rinaldi, Vito Gaetano La Verde, Matteo Coliva, Federico Cammisa, Eugenio Lullini, Giada Caravelli, Silvio Mosca, Massimiliano Zaffagnini, Stefano Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Shoulder PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair in patients with isolated subscapularis tendon tears. METHODS: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating isolated subscapularis tears subsequently treated by arthroscopic or mini-open repair. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies reporting isolated subscapularis lesions treated by arthroscopic or mini-open repair, a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and clinical and functional outcomes reported in the study results. Articles not reporting functional outcomes or studies that reported results for anterosuperior rotator cuff tears without a separate analysis of subscapularis tendon tears were excluded. Studies older than 20 years and studies with a minimum follow-up of less than 12 months were also excluded. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria; 8 papers were included in the arthroscopic repair group, and 6 were included in the mini-open repair group (2 studies reported results for both techniques). The mean age reported was 49.3 years, and 85.1% of patients were male. The dominant limb was involved in 77.6% of the patients, and a traumatic onset of symptoms was verified in 76.3%. The mean time to surgery was 9.6 months. The Constant–Murley score showed positive results for the arthroscopic and mini-open groups, with mean postoperative values of 84.6 and 82.1, respectively. Promising results were also observed for pain, with a mean of 13.2 (out of 15) points for the arthroscopic group and 11.7 for the mini-open group. The long head of the biceps was involved in 78% of the patients, and LHB tenodesis or tenotomy were the most common concomitant procedures performed. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in clinical and functional outcomes between open and arthroscopic repair. Moreover, the same complication rates were reported in both treatments, but arthroscopic repair led to less postoperative pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10275809/ /pubmed/37004531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07403-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Shoulder
Rinaldi, Vito Gaetano
La Verde, Matteo
Coliva, Federico
Cammisa, Eugenio
Lullini, Giada
Caravelli, Silvio
Mosca, Massimiliano
Zaffagnini, Stefano
Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria
Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review
title Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review
title_full Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review
title_fullStr Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review
title_short Arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review
title_sort arthroscopic approach does not yield better results than open surgery after subscapularis repair: a systematic review
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37004531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07403-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rinaldivitogaetano arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview
AT laverdematteo arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview
AT colivafederico arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview
AT cammisaeugenio arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview
AT lullinigiada arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview
AT caravellisilvio arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview
AT moscamassimiliano arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview
AT zaffagninistefano arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview
AT marcheggianimuccioligiuliomaria arthroscopicapproachdoesnotyieldbetterresultsthanopensurgeryaftersubscapularisrepairasystematicreview