Cargando…
Do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity?
The aim of the present study was to predict amyloid-beta positivity using a conventional T1-weighted image, radiomics, and a diffusion-tensor image obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We included 186 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who underwent Florbetaben positron emission...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36639-7 |
_version_ | 1785059969893138432 |
---|---|
author | Jo, Sungyang Lee, Hyunna Kim, Hyung-Ji Suh, Chong Hyun Kim, Sang Joon Lee, Yoojin Roh, Jee Hoon Lee, Jae-Hong |
author_facet | Jo, Sungyang Lee, Hyunna Kim, Hyung-Ji Suh, Chong Hyun Kim, Sang Joon Lee, Yoojin Roh, Jee Hoon Lee, Jae-Hong |
author_sort | Jo, Sungyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to predict amyloid-beta positivity using a conventional T1-weighted image, radiomics, and a diffusion-tensor image obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We included 186 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who underwent Florbetaben positron emission tomography (PET), MRI (three-dimensional T1-weighted and diffusion-tensor images), and neuropsychological tests at the Asan Medical Center. We developed a stepwise machine learning algorithm using demographics, T1 MRI features (volume, cortical thickness and radiomics), and diffusion-tensor image to distinguish amyloid-beta positivity on Florbetaben PET. We compared the performance of each algorithm based on the MRI features used. The study population included 72 patients with MCI in the amyloid-beta-negative group and 114 patients with MCI in the amyloid-beta-positive group. The machine learning algorithm using T1 volume performed better than that using only clinical information (mean area under the curve [AUC]: 0.73 vs. 0.69, p < 0.001). The machine learning algorithm using T1 volume showed better performance than that using cortical thickness (mean AUC: 0.73 vs. 0.68, p < 0.001) or texture (mean AUC: 0.73 vs. 0.71, p = 0.002). The performance of the machine learning algorithm using fractional anisotropy in addition to T1 volume was not better than that using T1 volume alone (mean AUC: 0.73 vs. 0.73, p = 0.60). Among MRI features, T1 volume was the best predictor of amyloid PET positivity. Radiomics or diffusion-tensor images did not provide additional benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10275931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102759312023-06-18 Do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity? Jo, Sungyang Lee, Hyunna Kim, Hyung-Ji Suh, Chong Hyun Kim, Sang Joon Lee, Yoojin Roh, Jee Hoon Lee, Jae-Hong Sci Rep Article The aim of the present study was to predict amyloid-beta positivity using a conventional T1-weighted image, radiomics, and a diffusion-tensor image obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We included 186 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who underwent Florbetaben positron emission tomography (PET), MRI (three-dimensional T1-weighted and diffusion-tensor images), and neuropsychological tests at the Asan Medical Center. We developed a stepwise machine learning algorithm using demographics, T1 MRI features (volume, cortical thickness and radiomics), and diffusion-tensor image to distinguish amyloid-beta positivity on Florbetaben PET. We compared the performance of each algorithm based on the MRI features used. The study population included 72 patients with MCI in the amyloid-beta-negative group and 114 patients with MCI in the amyloid-beta-positive group. The machine learning algorithm using T1 volume performed better than that using only clinical information (mean area under the curve [AUC]: 0.73 vs. 0.69, p < 0.001). The machine learning algorithm using T1 volume showed better performance than that using cortical thickness (mean AUC: 0.73 vs. 0.68, p < 0.001) or texture (mean AUC: 0.73 vs. 0.71, p = 0.002). The performance of the machine learning algorithm using fractional anisotropy in addition to T1 volume was not better than that using T1 volume alone (mean AUC: 0.73 vs. 0.73, p = 0.60). Among MRI features, T1 volume was the best predictor of amyloid PET positivity. Radiomics or diffusion-tensor images did not provide additional benefits. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10275931/ /pubmed/37328578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36639-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Jo, Sungyang Lee, Hyunna Kim, Hyung-Ji Suh, Chong Hyun Kim, Sang Joon Lee, Yoojin Roh, Jee Hoon Lee, Jae-Hong Do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity? |
title | Do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity? |
title_full | Do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity? |
title_fullStr | Do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity? |
title_short | Do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity? |
title_sort | do radiomics or diffusion-tensor images provide additional information to predict brain amyloid-beta positivity? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36639-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT josungyang doradiomicsordiffusiontensorimagesprovideadditionalinformationtopredictbrainamyloidbetapositivity AT leehyunna doradiomicsordiffusiontensorimagesprovideadditionalinformationtopredictbrainamyloidbetapositivity AT kimhyungji doradiomicsordiffusiontensorimagesprovideadditionalinformationtopredictbrainamyloidbetapositivity AT suhchonghyun doradiomicsordiffusiontensorimagesprovideadditionalinformationtopredictbrainamyloidbetapositivity AT kimsangjoon doradiomicsordiffusiontensorimagesprovideadditionalinformationtopredictbrainamyloidbetapositivity AT leeyoojin doradiomicsordiffusiontensorimagesprovideadditionalinformationtopredictbrainamyloidbetapositivity AT rohjeehoon doradiomicsordiffusiontensorimagesprovideadditionalinformationtopredictbrainamyloidbetapositivity AT leejaehong doradiomicsordiffusiontensorimagesprovideadditionalinformationtopredictbrainamyloidbetapositivity |